Australian Centre for Heart Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (Drs Murphy, Rogerson, and Jackson and Mr Le Grande); Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (Drs Murphy and Jackson and Mr Le Grande); Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (Drs Hesselson, Iismaa, and Graham); St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (Drs Iismaa and Graham); Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (Dr Hoover); and Centre on Behavioral Health, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, HongKong, China (Dr Jackson).
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2023 Sep 1;43(5):338-345. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000782. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), particularly in younger women without classic cardiac risk factors. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is considered to be particularly stressful; however, few studies have quantified SCAD survivor stress levels. This study compared anxiety, depression, and distress levels in SCAD and non-SCAD AMI patients.
A sample of 162 AMI (35 [22%] SCAD) patients was recruited from hospitals and via social media, in Australia and the United States. All had had their AMI in the past 6 mo. Participants completed an online questionnaire comprising the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD2), Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ2), Kessler-6 (K6), and Cardiac Distress Inventory (CDI). T-tests, χ 2 tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and analysis of covariance were used to compare SCAD and non-SCAD samples. Logistic regression was used to identify the unique predictors of anxiety, depression, and distress, controlling for relevant confounders.
Patients with SCAD were more commonly female and significantly younger than non-SCAD patients. Patients with SCAD scored significantly higher on the GAD2, PHQ2, K6, and CDI and a significantly larger proportion was classified as anxious, depressed, or distressed using these instruments. In logistic regression, together with mental health history, having had a SCAD-AMI predicted anxiety, depression, and distress, after controlling for female sex, younger age, and other confounding variables.
This study supports the view that anxiety, depression, and distress are more common after SCAD-AMI than after traditional AMI. These findings highlight the psychosocial impacts of SCAD and suggest that psychological support should be an important component of cardiac rehabilitation for these patients.
自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)是急性心肌梗死(AMI)的一个日益被认识的原因,特别是在没有典型心脏危险因素的年轻女性中。自发性冠状动脉夹层被认为是特别有压力的;然而,很少有研究对 SCAD 幸存者的压力水平进行量化。本研究比较了 SCAD 和非 SCAD AMI 患者的焦虑、抑郁和苦恼水平。
从澳大利亚和美国的医院和社交媒体招募了 162 名 AMI(35[22%] SCAD)患者。所有患者的 AMI 都发生在过去 6 个月内。参与者完成了一份在线问卷,包括广泛性焦虑症-2(GAD2)、患者健康问卷-2(PHQ2)、凯斯勒-6(K6)和心脏苦恼量表(CDI)。使用 t 检验、卡方检验、曼-惠特尼检验和协方差分析比较 SCAD 和非 SCAD 样本。使用逻辑回归来识别焦虑、抑郁和苦恼的独特预测因子,同时控制相关混杂因素。
SCAD 患者更常见于女性,且显著比非 SCAD 患者年轻。与非 SCAD 患者相比,SCAD 患者的 GAD2、PHQ2、K6 和 CDI 得分显著更高,并且使用这些工具,焦虑、抑郁或苦恼的患者比例显著更大。在逻辑回归中,与心理健康史一起,在控制女性、年轻、和其他混杂变量后,SCAD-AMI 预测焦虑、抑郁和苦恼。
本研究支持这样一种观点,即与传统 AMI 相比,SCAD-AMI 后焦虑、抑郁和苦恼更为常见。这些发现突显了 SCAD 的心理社会影响,并表明心理支持应该是这些患者心脏康复的重要组成部分。