• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较应用真空辅助穿刺装置在减少穿刺疼痛、提高自我监测频率和降低糖尿病患者 HbA1c 方面的益处。

Comparing the benefits of applying a vacuum assisted lancing device in reducing lancing pain, improving self-monitoring frequency and reducing HbA1c in people with diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Diabetes, Jothydev's Diabetes Research Centre, Mudavanmugal, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

Department of Diabetes, Jothydev's Diabetes Research Centre, Mudavanmugal, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2023 Mar;17(3):102731. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102731. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102731
PMID:36893684
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

For most people with diabetes (PwD), lancing fingertips for obtaining a blood sample is unavoidable during blood glucose monitoring (BGM). This study investigated the potential benefits of applying a vacuum over the penetration site immediately, before, during, and after lancing to determine if a vacuum would allow a less painful lancing process from fingertips and alternate sites, while still drawing sufficient blood, thereby allowing PwD to have a painless lancing experience and improving self-monitoring frequency. The cohort was encouraged to use a commercially available vacuum assisted lancing device. Change in pain perception, testing frequency, HbA1c, and future probability of VALD use were determined.

METHODS

In a 24-week randomized open-label, interventional, cross-over trial, 110 PwD were recruited who used VALD and non-vacuum conventional lancing devices, for 12 weeks each. Percentage reduction in HbA1c, percentage BGM adherence, scores of pain perception, and probability of selecting VALD in the future were measured and compared.

RESULTS

There was reduction in overall HbA1c values (mean ± SD), (from 9.01 ± 1.68% at baseline to 8.28 ± 1.66%) and individually in T1D (from 8.94 ± 1.77% to 8.25 ± 1.67%) and T2D (from 8.31 ± 1.17% to 8.59 ± 1.30) after using VALD for 12 weeks. Lower pain perception and high probability of using VALD over conventional devices were observed.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the benefits of applying a vacuum to the lance site which enhances the effectiveness in reducing and eliminating pain, improving self-monitoring frequency, and lowering HbA1c over non-vacuum conventional devices.

摘要

背景与目的

对于大多数糖尿病患者(PwD)来说,在血糖监测(BGM)期间,指尖采血是不可避免的。本研究旨在探讨在刺破指尖前、刺破时、刺破后立即对穿刺部位施加真空的潜在益处,以确定真空是否会使指尖和其他部位的刺破过程更不痛,同时仍能采集足够的血样,从而使 PwD 能够体验无痛刺破过程并提高自我监测频率。该队列被鼓励使用市售的真空辅助刺破设备。测定疼痛感知的变化、测试频率、HbA1c 和未来 VALD 使用的可能性。

方法

在一项 24 周的随机、开放标签、干预性、交叉试验中,招募了 110 名使用 VALD 和非真空常规刺破设备的 PwD,每组各使用 12 周。测量并比较了 HbA1c 降低百分比、整体 BGM 依从性百分比、疼痛感知评分和未来选择 VALD 的可能性。

结果

HbA1c 总体值(平均值±标准差)(从基线时的 9.01±1.68%降至 8.28±1.66%)和 T1D(从 8.94±1.77%降至 8.25±1.67%)和 T2D(从 8.31±1.17%降至 8.59±1.30%)个体值均有降低,使用 VALD 12 周后。观察到疼痛感知降低和更倾向于使用 VALD 而非常规设备。

结论

该研究强调了在刺破部位施加真空的益处,这可增强减轻和消除疼痛的效果,提高自我监测频率,并降低 HbA1c,优于非真空常规设备。

相似文献

1
Comparing the benefits of applying a vacuum assisted lancing device in reducing lancing pain, improving self-monitoring frequency and reducing HbA1c in people with diabetes.比较应用真空辅助穿刺装置在减少穿刺疼痛、提高自我监测频率和降低糖尿病患者 HbA1c 方面的益处。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2023 Mar;17(3):102731. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102731. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
2
Patient perceptions of different lancing sites for self-monitoring of blood glucose: a comparison of fingertip site with palm site using the OneTouch Ultra Blood Glucose Monitoring System.患者对用于自我血糖监测的不同采血部位的认知:使用稳豪倍优型血糖仪对指尖部位与手掌部位的比较
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 1;4(4):906-10. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400420.
3
Evaluating the OneTouch® Delica™: a low-pain lancing system for self-monitoring of blood glucose.评估 OneTouch® Delica™:一种用于自我监测血糖的低痛刺血系统。
Postgrad Med. 2011 Jul;123(4):92-8. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2011.07.2308.
4
Lancing: quo vadis?刺络放血术:何去何从?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Jul 1;5(4):966-81. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500420.
5
Comparison of lancing devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose regarding lancing pain.用于自我血糖监测的采血装置在采血疼痛方面的比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Sep 1;3(5):1136-43. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300517.
6
Clinical Evaluation of a New, Lower Pain, One Touch Lancing Device for People With Diabetes: Virtually Pain-Free Testing and Improved Comfort Compared to Current Lancing Systems.新型、低痛、一键式采血器在糖尿病患者中的临床评估:与现有采血系统相比,几乎无痛检测,舒适度显著提高。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jan;15(1):53-59. doi: 10.1177/1932296819856665. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Analysis of the comparison of lancing devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose regarding lancing pain.关于采血疼痛的血糖自我监测采血装置比较分析。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Sep 1;3(5):1144-5. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300518.
8
Evaluation of Three Lancing Devices: What Do Blood Volume and Lancing Pain Depend On?三种采血器的评估:采血血量和刺痛感取决于什么?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Sep;15(5):1076-1083. doi: 10.1177/1932296820949930. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
9
Biochemical and Pain Comparisons Between the Laser Lancing Device and Needle Lancets for Capillary Blood Sampling: A Randomized Control Trial.激光采血仪与采血针在毛细血管采血中的生化和疼痛比较:一项随机对照试验。
Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Mar;53(3):316-323. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23298. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
10
Frequency of mealtime insulin bolus predicts glycated hemoglobin in youths with type 1 diabetes.餐时胰岛素推注频率可预测1型糖尿病青少年的糖化血红蛋白水平。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Aug;16(8):519-23. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0356. Epub 2014 Apr 28.