Ahen Frederick, Buabeng Kwame O, Salo-Ahen Outi M H
Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Health Sciences, Kumasi, Ghana.
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 21;9(3):e13881. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13881. eCollection 2023 Mar.
This multidisciplinary study seeks to determine the nature and structure of the informal markets for counterfeit medicines, the co-factors underpinning the demand and supply of counterfeit Western allopathic medicines (WAM), traditional and alternative medicines (TAM), and potential institutional responses in Ghana.
This study is based on an interpretive research approach. It deploys a synthesis of a longitudinal ethnographic fieldwork, with multiple repeated visits for observations, analysis of documents, interviews, and focus group discussions.
The study identifies five major inter-related discoveries that point to the need for urgent institutional responses: Approaches to global health governance pay little attention to the complex economic gamut of TAM, including herbal medicines. The rise in necessity entrepreneurship and the availability of easy-to-use packaging and advertising technologies have made TAM a major competitor of WAM. The informal markets for WAM and TAM are structured in ways that allow them to evade formalized interventions and regulations. Standardization allows destructive entrepreneurs to derive advantage from economies of scale and reduce production costs, allowing the sector to flourish with little economic risk while inflicting violence on consumers. Personalization and co-creation of medicine with consumers has the added psychological effect of increasing consumer confidence. This, however, enlists consumers in the market violence against themselves.
Destructive entrepreneurship, whether inadvertent or criminal creates benefits for groups and individuals but negatively affects public health on various levels.
Mitigation and interventions that ignore the informal TAM market of destructive entrepreneurship only answer a part of the big question of how to guarantee patient/consumer safety from the threats of all counterfeits.
这项多学科研究旨在确定假药非正规市场的性质和结构、支撑假冒西方对抗疗法药物(WAM)、传统和替代药物(TAM)供需的共同因素,以及加纳可能的机构应对措施。
本研究基于一种解释性研究方法。它采用了纵向民族志田野调查的综合方法,多次重复进行观察、文件分析、访谈和焦点小组讨论。
该研究确定了五个主要的相互关联的发现,表明需要采取紧急的机构应对措施:全球卫生治理方法很少关注传统和替代药物(包括草药)的复杂经济范围。必要性创业的兴起以及易于使用的包装和广告技术的出现,使传统和替代药物成为西方对抗疗法药物的主要竞争对手。西方对抗疗法药物和传统和替代药物的非正规市场的结构方式使其能够规避正式的干预和监管。标准化使破坏性企业家能够从规模经济中获益并降低生产成本,使该行业在几乎没有经济风险的情况下蓬勃发展,同时却对消费者造成伤害。药物的个性化以及与消费者的共同创造具有增强消费者信心的额外心理效果。然而,这却让消费者参与到了对自身的市场暴力行为中。
破坏性创业,无论是无意的还是犯罪的,都会给群体和个人带来好处,但在各个层面上对公众健康产生负面影响。
忽视破坏性创业的传统和替代药物非正规市场的缓解措施和干预措施,只回答了如何保护患者/消费者免受所有假冒产品威胁这个重大问题的一部分。