Berridge Clara, Zhou Yuanjin, Robillard Julie M, Kaye Jeffrey
School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 21;14:1106633. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106633. eCollection 2023.
Given growing interest in companion robots to mitigate loneliness, large-scale studies are needed to understand peoples' perspectives on the use of robots to combat loneliness and attendant ethical issues. This study examines opinions about artificial companion (AC) robots regarding deception with dementia and impact on loneliness.
Data are from a survey of 825 members of the OHSU Research via Internet Technology and Experience cohort (response rate = 45%). Sixty percent ( = 496) of the age diverse sample (range = 25-88; = 64; SD = 13.17) is over 64, allowing us to compare across age and consider current and future older adults. Ordinal logistic regressions examined relationships between age, health, and other socio-demographic characteristics and perceptions of impact on loneliness and comfort with deception.
Most participants (68.7%) did not think an AC robot would make them feel less lonely and felt somewhat-to-very uncomfortable (69.3%) with the idea of being allowed to believe that an artificial companion is human. In adjusted models, one additional year of age was associated with lower likelihood of perceived benefit of reducing loneliness [Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.98; (0.97-0.99), = 0.003] and lower comfort with deception [OR = 0.99; (0.97-1.00), = 0.044]. Being female was associated with lower likelihood of comfort with deception [OR = 0.68; (0.50-0.93), = 0.014] and high confidence using computers with greater comfort [OR = 2.18; (1.42-3.38), < 0.001].
There was not strong support for AC robots to mitigate loneliness. Most participants were uncomfortable with this form of deception, indicating need for design solutions for those who want to avoid this possibility, as well as greater attentiveness to desirability and comfort across age and gender.
鉴于人们对陪伴机器人以减轻孤独感的兴趣日益浓厚,需要开展大规模研究来了解人们对于使用机器人对抗孤独感及相关伦理问题的看法。本研究调查了关于人工陪伴(AC)机器人在痴呆症欺骗方面的看法及其对孤独感的影响。
数据来自对俄勒冈健康与科学大学通过互联网技术和经验队列的825名成员进行的一项调查(回复率 = 45%)。年龄各异的样本(范围 = 25 - 88岁;平均年龄 = 64岁;标准差 = 13.17)中有60%(n = 496)年龄在64岁以上,这使我们能够跨年龄进行比较,并考虑当前和未来的老年人。有序逻辑回归分析了年龄、健康状况以及其他社会人口学特征与孤独感影响认知和欺骗舒适度之间的关系。
大多数参与者(68.7%)认为AC机器人不会让他们感到更不孤独,并且对于被允许相信人工陪伴是人类这一想法感到有些至非常不舒服(69.3%)。在调整后的模型中,年龄每增加一岁,感知到减少孤独感益处的可能性就越低[优势比(OR)= 0.98;(0.97 - 0.99),P = 0.0??03],对欺骗的舒适度也越低[OR = 0.99;(0.97 - 1.00),P = 0.044]。女性对欺骗的舒适度较低[OR = 0.68;(0.50 - 0.?93),P = 0.014],并且使用电脑时的高信心与更高的舒适度相关[OR = 2.18;(1.42 - 3.38),P < 0.001]。
对于AC机器人减轻孤独感并没有强有力的支持。大多数参与者对这种欺骗形式感到不舒服,这表明需要为那些希望避免这种可能性的人设计解决方案,同时也需要更加关注不同年龄和性别的需求及舒适度。