• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Companion robots to mitigate loneliness among older adults: Perceptions of benefit and possible deception.陪伴机器人减轻老年人孤独感:对益处和可能存在的欺骗的认知
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 21;14:1106633. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106633. eCollection 2023.
2
Ethical perceptions towards real-world use of companion robots with older people and people with dementia: survey opinions among younger adults.年轻人对陪伴机器人在老年人和痴呆症患者实际应用的伦理看法:一项针对年轻人的调查意见。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01641-5.
3
Association between loneliness and acceptance of using robots and pets as companions among older Chinese immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic.孤独感与在 COVID-19 大流行期间,老年中国移民接受使用机器人和宠物作为陪伴之间的关系。
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Sep;41(3):414-423. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13075. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
4
Improving the Social Well-Being of Single Older Adults Using the LOVOT Social Robot: Qualitative Phenomenological Study.利用 LOVOT 社交机器人提高单身老年人的社会幸福感:定性现象学研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 23;11:e56669. doi: 10.2196/56669.
5
The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study.利益相关者认知对老年护理用人形机器人使用的影响:互动后横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 4;25:e46617. doi: 10.2196/46617.
6
Identifying Preferred Appearance and Functional Requirements of Aged Care Robots Among Older Chinese Immigrants: Cross-Sectional Study.识别中国老年移民对老年护理机器人的外观偏好和功能需求:横断面研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Nov 8;6:e48646. doi: 10.2196/48646.
7
Needs and Preferences of Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Taiwan for Companion Robots and Pets: Survey Study.台湾中老年群体对陪伴机器人和宠物的需求和偏好:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 11;23(6):e23471. doi: 10.2196/23471.
8
Friends from the Future: A Scoping Review of Research into Robots and Computer Agents to Combat Loneliness in Older People.未来的朋友:一项关于机器人和计算机代理对抗老年人孤独感的研究综述
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 May 24;16:941-971. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S282709. eCollection 2021.
9
Recommendations for designing conversational companion robots with older adults through foundation models.通过基础模型与老年人设计对话式陪伴机器人的建议。
Front Robot AI. 2024 May 27;11:1363713. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1363713. eCollection 2024.
10
Ethical implications in using robots among older adults living with dementia.在患有痴呆症的老年人中使用机器人的伦理问题。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 25;15:1436273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436273. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating Elderly Individuals' Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Powered Companion Robots: The Influence of Individual Characteristics.调查老年人对人工智能驱动的陪伴机器人的接受度:个体特征的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 18;15(5):697. doi: 10.3390/bs15050697.
2
A multi-label text sentiment analysis model based on sentiment correlation modeling.一种基于情感关联建模的多标签文本情感分析模型。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 20;15:1490796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1490796. eCollection 2024.
3
Perceptions and experiences of Korean American older adults with companion robots through long-term use: a comparative analysis of robot retention vs. return.韩裔美国老年人长期使用陪伴机器人的认知与体验:机器人留存与归还的对比分析
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 18;12:1424123. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1424123. eCollection 2024.
4
Developing, delivering, and evaluating an online course on socially assistive robots in culturally competent and compassionate healthcare: A sequential multiphase, mixed-method study.开发、提供并评估一门关于社交辅助机器人在具有文化胜任力和同情心的医疗保健中的在线课程:一项多阶段、多方法的序贯研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 29;10:20552076241271792. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271792. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Recommendations for designing conversational companion robots with older adults through foundation models.通过基础模型与老年人设计对话式陪伴机器人的建议。
Front Robot AI. 2024 May 27;11:1363713. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1363713. eCollection 2024.
6
"Dementia Doesn't Mean That Life Doesn't Have More Wonderful Things Ahead": A Qualitative Study Evaluating a Canadian Dementia Support Services Program.“痴呆并不意味着生活没有更多美好在前方”:一项评估加拿大痴呆症支持服务项目的定性研究
Can Geriatr J. 2024 Jun 3;27(2):116-125. doi: 10.5770/cgj.27.698. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Are robots the solution to the crisis in older-person care?机器人是解决老年人护理危机的办法吗?
Nature. 2024 Apr 25. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-01184-4.
8
Detection of emotion by text analysis using machine learning.利用机器学习通过文本分析进行情感检测。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 20;14:1190326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190326. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Control Matters in Elder Care Technology:: Evidence and Direction for Designing It In.老年护理技术中的控制问题:设计中的证据与方向
DIS (Des Interact Syst Conf). 2022 Jun;2022:1831-1848. doi: 10.1145/3532106.3533471. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
2
Robots in Geriatric Mental Health: Pipe Dream or Viable Solution?老年心理健康领域的机器人:白日梦还是可行的解决方案?
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;30(2):246-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
3
Dignity, Autonomy, and Style of Company: Dimensions Older Adults Consider for Robot Companions.尊严、自主性与陪伴风格:老年人对机器人伴侣的考量维度
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2021 Apr;5. doi: 10.1145/3449178.
4
Acceptability of Social Robots and Adaptation of Hybrid-Face Robot for Dementia Care in India: A Qualitative Study.社交机器人的可接受性和混合脸机器人在印度的痴呆症护理中的适应性:定性研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;30(2):240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.05.003. Epub 2021 May 13.
5
Domain Experts on Dementia-Care Technologies: Mitigating Risk in Design and Implementation.痴呆症护理技术领域专家:降低设计与实施中的风险
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Feb 18;27(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00286-w.
6
The Impact of a Global Pandemic on People Living with Dementia and Their Care Partners: Analysis of 417 Lived Experience Reports.全球大流行病对痴呆症患者及其照护者的影响:对 417 份生活体验报告的分析。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(2):865-875. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201114.
7
Addressing the Ethics of Telepresence Applications Through End-User Engagement.通过终端用户参与解决远程呈现应用的伦理问题。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;76(2):457-460. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200154.
8
Ethical Issues Raised by the Introduction of Artificial Companions to Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Call for Interdisciplinary Collaborations.引入人工伴侣给认知障碍的老年人带来的伦理问题:呼吁跨学科合作。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;76(2):445-455. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190952.
9
Shall I compare thee…to a robot? An exploratory pilot study using participatory arts and social robotics to improve psychological well-being in later life.我能否将你比作机器人?一项使用参与式艺术和社交机器人来改善晚年心理健康的探索性试点研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Mar;25(3):575-584. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1699016. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
10
Engagement and experience of older people with socially assistive robots in home care.老年人在居家护理中与社会辅助机器人的互动和体验。
Assist Technol. 2021 Mar 4;33(2):57-71. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2019.1588805. Epub 2019 May 7.

陪伴机器人减轻老年人孤独感:对益处和可能存在的欺骗的认知

Companion robots to mitigate loneliness among older adults: Perceptions of benefit and possible deception.

作者信息

Berridge Clara, Zhou Yuanjin, Robillard Julie M, Kaye Jeffrey

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 21;14:1106633. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106633. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1106633
PMID:36895732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9988932/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Given growing interest in companion robots to mitigate loneliness, large-scale studies are needed to understand peoples' perspectives on the use of robots to combat loneliness and attendant ethical issues. This study examines opinions about artificial companion (AC) robots regarding deception with dementia and impact on loneliness.

METHODS

Data are from a survey of 825 members of the OHSU Research via Internet Technology and Experience cohort (response rate = 45%). Sixty percent ( = 496) of the age diverse sample (range = 25-88;  = 64; SD = 13.17) is over 64, allowing us to compare across age and consider current and future older adults. Ordinal logistic regressions examined relationships between age, health, and other socio-demographic characteristics and perceptions of impact on loneliness and comfort with deception.

RESULTS

Most participants (68.7%) did not think an AC robot would make them feel less lonely and felt somewhat-to-very uncomfortable (69.3%) with the idea of being allowed to believe that an artificial companion is human. In adjusted models, one additional year of age was associated with lower likelihood of perceived benefit of reducing loneliness [Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.98; (0.97-0.99),  = 0.003] and lower comfort with deception [OR = 0.99; (0.97-1.00),  = 0.044]. Being female was associated with lower likelihood of comfort with deception [OR = 0.68; (0.50-0.93),  = 0.014] and high confidence using computers with greater comfort [OR = 2.18; (1.42-3.38),  < 0.001].

DISCUSSION

There was not strong support for AC robots to mitigate loneliness. Most participants were uncomfortable with this form of deception, indicating need for design solutions for those who want to avoid this possibility, as well as greater attentiveness to desirability and comfort across age and gender.

摘要

目的

鉴于人们对陪伴机器人以减轻孤独感的兴趣日益浓厚,需要开展大规模研究来了解人们对于使用机器人对抗孤独感及相关伦理问题的看法。本研究调查了关于人工陪伴(AC)机器人在痴呆症欺骗方面的看法及其对孤独感的影响。

方法

数据来自对俄勒冈健康与科学大学通过互联网技术和经验队列的825名成员进行的一项调查(回复率 = 45%)。年龄各异的样本(范围 = 25 - 88岁;平均年龄 = 64岁;标准差 = 13.17)中有60%(n = 496)年龄在64岁以上,这使我们能够跨年龄进行比较,并考虑当前和未来的老年人。有序逻辑回归分析了年龄、健康状况以及其他社会人口学特征与孤独感影响认知和欺骗舒适度之间的关系。

结果

大多数参与者(68.7%)认为AC机器人不会让他们感到更不孤独,并且对于被允许相信人工陪伴是人类这一想法感到有些至非常不舒服(69.3%)。在调整后的模型中,年龄每增加一岁,感知到减少孤独感益处的可能性就越低[优势比(OR)= 0.98;(0.97 - 0.99),P = 0.0??03],对欺骗的舒适度也越低[OR = 0.99;(0.97 - 1.00),P = 0.044]。女性对欺骗的舒适度较低[OR = 0.68;(0.50 - 0.?93),P = 0.014],并且使用电脑时的高信心与更高的舒适度相关[OR = 2.18;(1.42 - 3.38),P < 0.001]。

讨论

对于AC机器人减轻孤独感并没有强有力的支持。大多数参与者对这种欺骗形式感到不舒服,这表明需要为那些希望避免这种可能性的人设计解决方案,同时也需要更加关注不同年龄和性别的需求及舒适度。