Koehler Friederike, Schäfer Sarah K, Lieb Klaus, Wessa Michèle
Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Wallstraße 7, Mainz 55122, Germany.
Centre of Excellence in Music, Mind, Body and Brain, Department of Music, Art and Culture Studies, University of Jyväskylä, Seminaarinkatu 15, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Jul-Sep;23(3):100377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100377. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Several factors associated with resilience as the maintenance of mental health despite stress exposure can be strengthened through participation in leisure time activities. Since many people listen to or make music in their leisure time, the aim of the present study was to provide insights into the architecture of how resilience relates to passive and active music engagement.
511 participants regularly listening to and/or making music completed an online survey on resilient outcomes (i.e., mental health and stressor recovery ability), different resilience factors (e.g., optimism, social support), quantitative music engagement (i.e., time spent with music listening/making) and qualitative music engagement (i.e., use of music listening/making for mood regulation).
Bivariate correlations showed that subjects spending more time with music making reported better stressor recovery ability and less mental health problems, while partial correlational network analysis revealed no unique associations for quantitative music engagement. Regarding qualitative music engagement, people using music-based mood regulation reported lower mental health, mindfulness, and optimism, but also higher social support. A more heterogeneous pattern emerged for single music-based mood regulation strategies.
Our findings highlight the importance of the individual (mal-)adaptive use of music, painting a more nuanced picture of music engagement and resilience.
背景/目的：尽管面临压力暴露，但作为维持心理健康的复原力与几个因素相关，通过参与休闲活动可以增强这些因素。由于许多人在休闲时间听音乐或创作音乐，本研究的目的是深入了解复原力与被动和主动音乐参与之间的关系结构。
511名经常听音乐和/或创作音乐的参与者完成了一项关于复原力结果（即心理健康和应激源恢复能力）、不同复原力因素（如乐观、社会支持）、定量音乐参与（即花在听音乐/创作音乐上的时间）和定性音乐参与（即使用听音乐/创作音乐来调节情绪）的在线调查。
双变量相关性表明，花更多时间创作音乐的受试者报告了更好的应激源恢复能力和更少的心理健康问题，而偏相关网络分析显示定量音乐参与没有独特的关联。关于定性音乐参与，使用基于音乐的情绪调节的人报告了较低的心理健康、正念和乐观，但也有较高的社会支持。对于单一的基于音乐的情绪调节策略，出现了更异质的模式。
我们的研究结果强调了个体（不）适应性地使用音乐的重要性，描绘了一幅关于音乐参与和复原力的更细致入微的图景。
