Kunzler Angela M, Chmitorz Andrea, Bagusat Christiana, Kaluza Antonia J, Hoffmann Isabell, Schäfer Markus, Quiring Oliver, Rigotti Thomas, Kalisch Raffael, Tüscher Oliver, Franke Andreas G, van Dick Rolf, Lieb Klaus
Deutsches Resilienz Zentrum (DRZ) Mainz, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany.
Eur J Health Psychol. 2018;25(3):107-117. doi: 10.1027/2512-8442/a000016. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) measures the ability to recover from stress. To provide further evidence for construct validity of the German BRS and to determine population-based norms, a large sample ( = 1,128) representative of the German adult population completed a survey including the BRS and instruments measuring perceived stress and the resilience factors optimism, self-efficacy, and locus of control. Confirmatory factor analyses showed best model fit for a five-factor model differentiating the ability to recover from stress from the three resilience factors. On the basis of latent and manifest correlations, convergent and discriminant validity of the BRS were fair to good. Female sex, older age, lower weekly working time, higher perceived stress, lower optimism, and self-efficacy as well as higher external locus of control predicted lower BRS scores, that is, lower ability to recover from stress.
简短复原力量表(BRS)用于测量从压力中恢复的能力。为了进一步证明德文版BRS的结构效度并确定基于人群的常模,一个代表德国成年人口的大样本(n = 1128)完成了一项调查,该调查包括BRS以及测量感知压力和复原力因素(乐观、自我效能感和控制点)的工具。验证性因素分析表明,五因素模型的拟合度最佳,该模型将从压力中恢复的能力与三个复原力因素区分开来。基于潜在和明显的相关性,BRS的聚合效度和区分效度为中等至良好。女性、年龄较大、每周工作时间较短、感知压力较高、乐观程度较低、自我效能感较低以及外部控制点较高预示着BRS得分较低,即从压力中恢复的能力较低。