Suppr超能文献

德国简易复原力量表(BRS)的结构效度及基于人群的常模

Construct Validity and Population-Based Norms of the German Brief Resilience Scale (BRS).

作者信息

Kunzler Angela M, Chmitorz Andrea, Bagusat Christiana, Kaluza Antonia J, Hoffmann Isabell, Schäfer Markus, Quiring Oliver, Rigotti Thomas, Kalisch Raffael, Tüscher Oliver, Franke Andreas G, van Dick Rolf, Lieb Klaus

机构信息

Deutsches Resilienz Zentrum (DRZ) Mainz, Germany.

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Health Psychol. 2018;25(3):107-117. doi: 10.1027/2512-8442/a000016. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

Abstract

The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) measures the ability to recover from stress. To provide further evidence for construct validity of the German BRS and to determine population-based norms, a large sample ( = 1,128) representative of the German adult population completed a survey including the BRS and instruments measuring perceived stress and the resilience factors optimism, self-efficacy, and locus of control. Confirmatory factor analyses showed best model fit for a five-factor model differentiating the ability to recover from stress from the three resilience factors. On the basis of latent and manifest correlations, convergent and discriminant validity of the BRS were fair to good. Female sex, older age, lower weekly working time, higher perceived stress, lower optimism, and self-efficacy as well as higher external locus of control predicted lower BRS scores, that is, lower ability to recover from stress.

摘要

简短复原力量表(BRS)用于测量从压力中恢复的能力。为了进一步证明德文版BRS的结构效度并确定基于人群的常模,一个代表德国成年人口的大样本(n = 1128)完成了一项调查,该调查包括BRS以及测量感知压力和复原力因素(乐观、自我效能感和控制点)的工具。验证性因素分析表明,五因素模型的拟合度最佳,该模型将从压力中恢复的能力与三个复原力因素区分开来。基于潜在和明显的相关性,BRS的聚合效度和区分效度为中等至良好。女性、年龄较大、每周工作时间较短、感知压力较高、乐观程度较低、自我效能感较低以及外部控制点较高预示着BRS得分较低,即从压力中恢复的能力较低。

相似文献

1
Construct Validity and Population-Based Norms of the German Brief Resilience Scale (BRS).
Eur J Health Psychol. 2018;25(3):107-117. doi: 10.1027/2512-8442/a000016. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
3
Reliability and validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Spanish Version.
Psychol Assess. 2016 May;28(5):e101-e110. doi: 10.1037/pas0000191. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
4
Population-based validation of a German version of the Brief Resilience Scale.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 13;13(2):e0192761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192761. eCollection 2018.
7
How Czecho-Slovakia Bounces Back: Population-Based Validation of the Brief Resilience Scale in Two Central European Countries.
Psychol Rep. 2022 Oct;125(5):2807-2827. doi: 10.1177/00332941211029619. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
8
Validation of the Polish version of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS).
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0237038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237038. eCollection 2020.
9
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Portuguese Version: validity and metrics for the older adult population.
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Aug;25(8):1554-1563. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1753015. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

8
Association between psychological resilience and body mass index in a community-based population: A cross-sectional study.
Obes Sci Pract. 2024 May 11;10(3):e761. doi: 10.1002/osp4.761. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Association between sleep duration and psychological resilience in a population-based survey: A cross-sectional study.
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Feb 26;13:43. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_832_23. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 5;7(7):CD012527. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012527.pub2.
3
Population-based validation of a German version of the Brief Resilience Scale.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 13;13(2):e0192761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192761. eCollection 2018.
5
Can having internal locus of control insure against negative shocks? Psychological evidence from panel data.
J Econ Behav Organ. 2016 Feb;122:88-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
6
Childhood adversities and distress - The role of resilience in a representative sample.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 15;12(3):e0173826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173826. eCollection 2017.
8
Reliability and validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Spanish Version.
Psychol Assess. 2016 May;28(5):e101-e110. doi: 10.1037/pas0000191. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
10
A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience.
Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:e92. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1400082X. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验