Suppr超能文献

[德国临终时姑息治疗的利用情况:时间趋势(2016 - 2019年)及地区差异]

[Utilization of palliative care at the end of life in Germany: temporal trend (2016-2019) and regional variability].

作者信息

Ditscheid Bianka, Meissner Franziska, Gebel Cordula, Hennig Beata, Marschall Ursula, Meißner Winfried, Wedding Ulrich, Freytag Antje

机构信息

Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Bachstr. 18, 07743, Jena, Deutschland.

Abteilung Palliativmedizin der Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Apr;66(4):432-442. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03683-7. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Germany, palliative care (PC) is provided on a homecare, inpatient, general, and specialized basis. Since little is currently known about the temporal course and regional differences in the forms of care, the present study was aimed to investigate this.

METHOD

In a retrospective routine data study with 417,405 BARMER-insured persons who died between 2016 and 2019, we determined the utilization rates of primary PC (PPC), specially qualified and coordinated palliative homecare (PPC+), specialized palliative homecare (SPHC), inpatient PC, and hospice care on the basis of services billed at least once in the last year of life. We calculated time trends and regional variability and controlled for needs-related patient characteristics and access-related county of community characteristics.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2019, total PC increased from 33.8 to 36.2%, SPHC from 13.3 to 16.0% (max: Rhineland-Palatinate), and inpatient PC from 8.9 to 9.9% (max: Thuringia). PPC decreased from 25.8 to 23.9% (min: Brandenburg) and PPC+ came in at 4.4% (max: Saarland) in 2019. Hospice care remained constant at 3.4%. Regional variability in utilization rates remained high, increased for PPC and inpatient PC from 2016 to 2019, and decreased for SPHC and hospice care. The regional differences were also evident after adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Increasingly more SPHC, less PPC, and high regional variability, which cannot be explained by demand- or access-related characteristics, indicate that the use of PC forms is oriented less to demand than to regionally available care capacities. In view of the growing need for palliative care due to demographic factors and decreasing personnel resources, this development must be viewed critically.

摘要

背景

在德国,姑息治疗(PC)通过居家护理、住院护理、普通护理和专科护理等方式提供。由于目前对于护理形式的时间进程和地区差异了解甚少,本研究旨在对此进行调查。

方法

在一项回顾性常规数据研究中,我们对2016年至2019年间死亡的417405名BARMER保险参保人员进行了研究,根据其生命最后一年中至少开具过一次账单的服务项目,确定了初级姑息治疗(PPC)、具备专业资质且协调一致的姑息居家护理(PPC+)、专科姑息居家护理(SPHC)、住院姑息治疗以及临终关怀的利用率。我们计算了时间趋势和地区差异,并对与需求相关的患者特征以及与医疗可及性相关的社区县特征进行了控制。

结果

从2016年到2019年,姑息治疗总利用率从33.8%升至36.2%,专科姑息居家护理从13.3%升至16.0%(最高:莱茵兰 - 普法尔茨州),住院姑息治疗从8.9%升至9.9%(最高:图林根州)。初级姑息治疗从25.8%降至23.9%(最低:勃兰登堡州),2019年具备专业资质且协调一致的姑息居家护理占4.4%(最高:萨尔兰州)。临终关怀保持在3.4%不变。利用率的地区差异仍然很大,2016年至2019年期间,初级姑息治疗和住院姑息治疗的地区差异有所增加,而专科姑息居家护理和临终关怀的地区差异有所减少。调整后地区差异依然明显。

结论

专科姑息居家护理越来越多,初级姑息治疗越来越少,且存在无法用需求或医疗可及性相关特征解释的高地区差异,这表明姑息治疗形式的使用更多地取决于地区现有的护理能力,而非需求。鉴于人口因素导致对姑息治疗的需求不断增加以及人力资源减少,必须审慎看待这一发展趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee07/10063517/ba29ec1c050b/103_2023_3683_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验