Ditscheid Bianka, Krause Markus, Lehmann Thomas, Stichling Kathleen, Jansky Maximiliane, Nauck Friedemann, Wedding Ulrich, Schneider Werner, Marschall Ursula, Meißner Winfried, Freytag Antje
Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Bachstr. 18, 07743, Jena, Deutschland.
Zentrum für Klinische Studien, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Dec;63(12):1502-1510. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03240-6. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
Palliative care supply increased in Germany in recent years. But how many people use which forms of palliative care and how does this differ between regions?
Retrospective cohort study with claims data from insured persons who died in 2016: Based on services billed at least once in the last six months of life, we determined the use of primary palliative care (PPC), specialized palliative homecare (SPHC), as well as inpatient palliative and hospice care, using regional billing codes for PPC and SPHC services for the first time.
Of the 95,962 deceased in the study population, 32.7% received palliative care nationwide, with variations from 26.4% in Bremen to 40.8% in Bavaria. PPC services were billed at 24.4% (16.9% in Brandenburg to 34.1% in Bavaria). SPHC services received 13.1% (6.3% in Rhineland-Palatinate to 18.9% in Brandenburg and 22.9% in Westphalia-Lippe with different SPHC practices). Inpatient palliative care was received by 8.1% (6.7% in Schleswig-Holstein/Hesse to 13.0% in Thuringia); 3.3% (1.6% in Bremen to 5.6% in Berlin) with hospice services.
SPHC is used more frequently than previously reported, while PPC is declining. Utilization seems to be based less on objective needs than on region-specific framework conditions. Besides needs criteria, further development of palliative care should be oriented more towards outcomes and relevant framework conditions.
近年来德国姑息治疗服务供给有所增加。但有多少人使用了哪种形式的姑息治疗,以及不同地区之间情况有何差异?
对2016年死亡的参保人员的理赔数据进行回顾性队列研究:基于在生命最后六个月至少开具过一次账单的服务,我们首次使用姑息治疗初级服务(PPC)和专科姑息家庭护理(SPHC)的地区计费代码,确定了PPC、SPHC以及住院姑息和临终关怀服务的使用情况。
在研究人群的95962名死者中,全国有32.7%的人接受了姑息治疗,各地区有所不同,不来梅为26.4%,巴伐利亚为40.8%。PPC服务的计费比例为24.4%(勃兰登堡为16.9%,巴伐利亚为34.1%)。SPHC服务的比例为13.1%(莱茵兰 - 普法尔茨为6.3%,勃兰登堡为18.9%,威斯特法伦 - 利珀为22.9%,SPHC服务情况各异)。8.1%的人接受了住院姑息治疗(石勒苏益格 - 荷尔斯泰因/黑森为6.7%,图林根为13.0%);3.3%的人接受了临终关怀服务(不来梅为1.6%,柏林为5.6%)。
SPHC的使用频率比之前报道的更高,而PPC则在下降。利用率似乎更多地基于地区特定的框架条件,而非客观需求。除了需求标准外,姑息治疗的进一步发展应更多地以结果和相关框架条件为导向。