Suppr超能文献

对物质使用治疗中心的提供者进行有关烟草使用治疗的教育,与为使用烟草的患者提供更多咨询和药物治疗相关联。

Educating Substance Use Treatment Center Providers on Tobacco Use Treatments Is Associated with Increased Provision of Counseling and Medication to Patients Who Use Tobacco.

机构信息

Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, 3657 Cullen Blvd, Stephen Power Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):4013. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054013.

Abstract

Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in America and is elevated among patients with non-tobacco substance use disorders. Substance use treatment centers (SUTCs) do not commonly address their patients' tobacco use. Lack of knowledge on treating tobacco use with counseling and medication may be a barrier that underlies this inaction. A multi-component tobacco-free workplace program implemented in Texas SUTCs educated providers on treating tobacco use with evidence-based medication (or referral) and counseling. This study examined how center-level changes in knowledge from pre- to post-implementation (i.e., over time) affected center-level behavioral changes in providers' provision of tobacco use treatment over time. Providers from 15 SUTCs completed pre- and post-implementation surveys (pre N = 259; post N = 194) assessing (1) perceived barriers to treating tobacco use, specifically, a lack of knowledge on treating tobacco use with counseling or medication; (2) receipt of past-year education on treating tobacco use with counseling or medication; and (3) their intervention practices, specifically, the self-reported regular use of (a) counseling or (b) medication intervention or referral with patients who use tobacco. Generalized linear mixed models explored associations between provider-reported knowledge barriers, education receipt, and intervention practices over time. Overall, recent counseling education receipt was endorsed by 32.00% versus 70.21% of providers from pre- to post-implementation; the regular use of counseling to treat tobacco use was endorsed by 19.31% versus 28.87% from pre- to post-implementation. Recent medication education receipt was endorsed by 20.46% versus 71.88% of providers from pre- to post-implementation; the regular use of medication to treat tobacco use was endorsed by 31.66% versus 55.15% from pre- to post-implementation. All changes were statistically significant (s < 0.05). High versus low reductions in the provider-reported barrier of "lack of knowledge on pharmacotherapy treatment" over time were a significant moderator of effects, such that SUTCs with high reductions in this barrier were more likely to report greater increases in both medication education receipt and medication treatment/referral for patients who use tobacco over time. In conclusion, a tobacco-free workplace program implementation strategy that included SUTC provider education improved knowledge and resulted in increased delivery of evidence-based treatment of tobacco use at SUTCs; however, treatment provision rates-in particular, offering tobacco cessation counseling-remained less than desirable, suggesting that barriers beyond lack of knowledge may be important to address to improve tobacco use care in SUTCs. Moderation results suggest (1) differences in the mechanisms underlying uptake of counseling education versus medication education and (2) that the relative difficulty of providing counseling versus providing medication persists regardless of knowledge gains.

摘要

在美国,吸烟是导致死亡的首要可预防因素,且在患有非烟草物质使用障碍的患者中更为常见。物质使用治疗中心(SUTCs)通常不解决其患者的吸烟问题。缺乏关于使用咨询和药物治疗吸烟的知识可能是导致这种不作为的一个障碍。在德克萨斯州的 SUTCs 实施的一项多部分无烟草工作场所计划,使提供者接受了使用基于证据的药物(或转介)和咨询治疗吸烟的教育。本研究考察了中心层面的知识变化(即随着时间的推移)如何影响提供者提供烟草使用治疗的中心层面的行为变化。来自 15 个 SUTCs 的提供者完成了实施前(预 N = 259)和实施后的(后 N = 194)调查,评估了(1)治疗烟草使用的感知障碍,特别是缺乏关于使用咨询或药物治疗烟草使用的知识;(2)过去一年接受的关于使用咨询或药物治疗烟草使用的教育;以及(3)他们的干预实践,特别是自我报告的定期使用(a)与使用烟草的患者进行咨询或(b)药物干预或转介。广义线性混合模型探讨了提供者报告的知识障碍、教育接受度和干预实践随时间的变化之间的关联。总体而言,从实施前到实施后,最近的咨询教育接受度分别为 32.00%和 70.21%的提供者认可;从实施前到实施后,定期使用咨询治疗烟草使用的比例分别为 19.31%和 28.87%。最近的药物教育接受度分别为 20.46%和 71.88%的提供者认可;从实施前到实施后,定期使用药物治疗烟草使用的比例分别为 31.66%和 55.15%。所有变化均具有统计学意义(s < 0.05)。随着时间的推移,提供者报告的“缺乏药理学治疗知识”障碍的减少程度较高,这是影响的一个显著调节剂,因此,在这种障碍减少程度较高的 SUTCs 中,更有可能报告随着时间的推移,药物教育接受度和药物治疗/转介的增加。总之,实施包括 SUTC 提供者教育在内的无烟草工作场所计划实施策略提高了知识水平,并导致 SUTCs 中更广泛地提供基于证据的烟草使用治疗;然而,治疗提供率——特别是提供烟草戒断咨询——仍然不尽如人意,这表明在 SUTCs 中改善烟草使用护理可能需要解决除知识之外的其他障碍。调节结果表明:(1)接受咨询教育和药物教育的机制存在差异;(2)无论知识是否增加,提供咨询服务的相对难度与提供药物服务的难度仍然存在差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验