• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对澳大利亚食品公司开展营养相关行动的支持:2020 年国际食品政策研究结果的横断面分析。

Public Support for Nutrition-Related Actions by Food Companies in Australia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Findings from the 2020 International Food Policy Study.

机构信息

Institute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood 3125, Australia.

School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054054.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20054054
PMID:36901060
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10002083/
Abstract

Unhealthy food environments contribute to unhealthy population diets. In Australia, the government currently relies on voluntary food company actions (e.g., related to front-of-pack labelling, restricting promotion of unhealthy foods, and product formulation) as part of their efforts to improve population diets, despite evidence that such voluntary approaches are less effective than mandatory policies. This study aimed to understand public perceptions of potential food industry nutrition-related actions in Australia. An online survey was completed by 4289 Australians in 2020 as part of the International Food Policy Study. The level of public support was assessed for six different nutrition-related actions related to food labelling, food promotion, and product formulation. High levels of support were observed for all six company actions, with the highest support observed for displaying the Health Star Rating on all products (80.4%) and restricting children's exposure to online promotion of unhealthy food (76.8%). Findings suggest the Australian public is strongly supportive of food companies taking action to improve nutrition and the healthiness of food environments. However, given the limitations of the voluntary action from food companies, mandatory policy action by the Australian government is likely to be needed to ensure company practices align with public expectations.

摘要

不健康的食品环境导致人们饮食不健康。在澳大利亚,政府目前依靠食品公司的自愿行动(例如与包装正面标签、限制不健康食品的促销以及产品配方相关的行动)来改善人口饮食,尽管有证据表明此类自愿方法不如强制性政策有效。本研究旨在了解澳大利亚公众对潜在食品行业营养相关行动的看法。2020 年,4289 名澳大利亚人在线完成了这项作为国际食品政策研究一部分的调查。评估了与食品标签、食品促销和产品配方相关的六项不同营养相关行动的公众支持程度。公众对所有六项公司行动表示高度支持,对在所有产品上显示健康星级评级(80.4%)和限制儿童接触在线推广的不健康食品(76.8%)的支持率最高。研究结果表明,澳大利亚公众强烈支持食品公司采取行动改善营养和食品环境的健康度。然而,鉴于食品公司自愿行动的局限性,澳大利亚政府可能需要采取强制性政策行动,以确保公司的做法符合公众的期望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895c/10002083/76173884e6ae/ijerph-20-04054-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895c/10002083/76173884e6ae/ijerph-20-04054-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895c/10002083/76173884e6ae/ijerph-20-04054-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Public Support for Nutrition-Related Actions by Food Companies in Australia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Findings from the 2020 International Food Policy Study.公众对澳大利亚食品公司开展营养相关行动的支持:2020 年国际食品政策研究结果的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054054.
2
Benchmarking the Nutrition-Related Policies and Commitments of Major Food Companies in Australia, 2018.2018 年澳大利亚主要食品公司的营养相关政策和承诺基准比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 22;17(17):6118. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176118.
3
Benchmarking Food and Beverage Companies on Obesity Prevention and Nutrition Policies: Evaluation of the BIA-Obesity Australia Initiative, 2017-2019.对肥胖预防和营养政策的食品和饮料公司进行基准测试:2017-2019 年 BIA-肥胖澳大利亚倡议的评估。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Dec 1;10(12):857-870. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.147.
4
Benchmarking the nutrition-related commitments and practices of major Belgian food companies.对标主要比利时食品公司在营养方面的承诺和实践。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Apr 7;19(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01269-1.
5
Food and beverage manufacturing and retailing company policies and commitments to improve the healthfulness of Canadian food environments.食品和饮料制造与零售公司改善加拿大食品环境健康度的政策和承诺。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):2419. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19864-1.
6
Compliance of Australian commercial foods for young children (<36 months) with an international nutrient and promotion profile model.澳大利亚针对幼儿(小于36个月)的商业食品与国际营养及推广概况模型的符合情况。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2024 Jun;48(3):100158. doi: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100158. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
7
An assessment of implementation gaps and priority recommendations on food environment policies: the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index in Japan.评估食品环境政策的实施差距和优先建议:日本健康食品环境政策指数。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jun;25(6):1720-1732. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004900. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
8
Extent of implementation of food environment policies by the Malaysian Government: gaps and priority recommendations.马来西亚政府实施食品环境政策的程度:差距和优先建议。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec;21(18):3395-3406. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002379. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
9
Effects of a Voluntary Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling System on Packaged Food Reformulation: The Health Star Rating System in New Zealand.自愿性的包装食品营养标签系统对食品配方调整的影响:新西兰的“星级营养评分系统”。
Nutrients. 2017 Aug 22;9(8):918. doi: 10.3390/nu9080918.
10
The role of Australian local governments in creating a healthy food environment: an analysis of policy documents from six Sydney local governments.澳大利亚地方政府在营造健康食物环境中的作用:对来自六个悉尼地方政府的政策文件的分析。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Apr;44(2):137-144. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12968. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
An examination of public support for 35 nutrition interventions across seven countries.对七个国家的 35 项营养干预措施的公众支持情况进行考察。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023 Feb;77(2):235-245. doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01211-5. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
2
The Conceptual Framework for the International Food Policy Study: Evaluating the Population-Level Impact of Food Policy.国际粮食政策研究概念框架:评估粮食政策对人口层面的影响。
J Nutr. 2022 Jun 13;152(Suppl 1):1S-12S. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac042.
3
Latest Trends in Investing for Improved Nutrition and Obesity Prevention.
最新的投资趋势,改善营养和预防肥胖。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2022 Mar;11(1):39-55. doi: 10.1007/s13668-021-00389-7. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
4
Australian Children's Exposure to, and Engagement With, Web-Based Marketing of Food and Drink Brands: Cross-sectional Observational Study.澳大利亚儿童接触和参与网络食品和饮料品牌营销的情况:横断面观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 12;23(7):e28144. doi: 10.2196/28144.
5
Public support for healthy supermarket initiatives focused on product placement: a multi-country cross-sectional analysis of the 2018 International Food Policy Study.公众对以产品布局为重点的健康超市倡议的支持:对 2018 年国际粮食政策研究的多国横断面分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jun 14;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01149-0.
6
A state-wide audit of unhealthy sponsorship within junior sporting clubs in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州对初级体育俱乐部中不健康赞助的全州审计。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(12):3797-3804. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002159. Epub 2021 May 26.
7
TV advertising and dietary intake in adolescents: a pre- and post- study of Chile's Food Marketing Policy.电视广告和青少年饮食摄入:智利食品营销政策的前后研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 May 4;18(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01126-7.
8
Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国家庭购买的软饮料变化与英国软饮料行业征税有关:对照中断时间序列分析。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 10;372:n254. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n254.
9
Are young adults' discussions of public health nutrition policies associated with common food industry discourses? A qualitative pilot study.年轻人对公共卫生营养政策的讨论是否与常见的食品行业话语有关?一项定性试点研究。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021 Apr;45(2):171-180. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13074. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
10
Benchmarking the Nutrition-Related Policies and Commitments of Major Food Companies in Australia, 2018.2018 年澳大利亚主要食品公司的营养相关政策和承诺基准比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 22;17(17):6118. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176118.