• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对以产品布局为重点的健康超市倡议的支持:对 2018 年国际粮食政策研究的多国横断面分析。

Public support for healthy supermarket initiatives focused on product placement: a multi-country cross-sectional analysis of the 2018 International Food Policy Study.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Biomedical Research Centre Network on Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBERobn), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jun 14;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01149-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-021-01149-0
PMID:34127002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8201822/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Food retail environments have an influential role in shaping purchasing behavior and could contribute to improving dietary patterns at a population level. However, little is known about the level of public support for different types of initiatives to encourage healthy food choices in supermarkets, and whether this varies across countries or context. The current study aimed to explore the level of support for three potential supermarket initiatives focused on product placement across five countries, and factors that may influence this support.

METHODS

A total of 22,264 adults from Australia, Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom and the United States (US) provided information on support for three supermarket initiatives related to product placement (targeting product positioning: 'checkouts with only healthy products', 'fewer end-of-aisle displays containing unhealthy foods or soft drinks' or availability: 'more shelf space for fresh and healthier foods') as part of the online 2018 International Food Policy Study. The proportion of respondents that supported each initiative was assessed across countries, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the influence of sociodemographic factors on support.

RESULTS

The initiative that received the highest support was 'more shelf space for fresh and healthier foods': 72.0% [95% CI 71.3-72.7], whereas 'checkouts with only healthy products' received the lowest support: 48.6% [95% CI 47.8-49.4]. The level of support differed between countries (p < 0.001 for all initiatives), with the US generally showing the lowest support and Mexico the highest. Noteworthy, in the overall sample, there was not much opposition to any of the initiatives (2.5-14.2%), whereas there was a large proportion of neutral responses (25.5-37.2%). Respondents who were older, female, highly educated, and those who reported having more nutrition knowledge tended to be more supportive, with several differences between countries and initiatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Most people in the assessed five countries showed a generally high level of support for three placement initiatives in supermarkets to encourage healthy food choices. Support varied by type of initiative (i.e., product positioning or availability) and was influenced by several factors related to country context and sociodemographic characteristics. This evidence could prompt and guide retailers and policy makers to take stronger action to promote healthy food choices in stores.

摘要

背景

食品零售环境在塑造购买行为方面具有重要作用,并有助于改善人群的饮食模式。然而,对于支持超市鼓励健康食品选择的不同类型举措的公众支持程度,以及这种支持在不同国家或背景下是否存在差异,人们知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨五个国家对三种潜在超市举措的支持程度,以及影响这种支持的因素。

方法

澳大利亚、加拿大、墨西哥、英国和美国(美国)的 22264 名成年人参与了此次在线 2018 年国际食品政策研究,他们提供了有关三种与产品定位相关的超市举措(定位目标:“仅健康产品结账处”、“减少末端过道展示的不健康食品或软饮料”或供应情况:“更多新鲜和更健康食品的货架空间”)的支持信息。评估了各国对每项举措的支持比例,并进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估社会人口因素对支持的影响。

结果

最受欢迎的举措是“为新鲜和更健康的食品提供更多货架空间”:72.0%[95%CI71.3-72.7%],而“仅健康产品结账处”的支持率最低:48.6%[95%CI47.8-49.4%]。支持率在国家之间存在差异(所有举措均为 p<0.001),美国的支持率普遍较低,墨西哥的支持率较高。值得注意的是,在总体样本中,对于任何一项举措都没有太多反对意见(2.5-14.2%),而中立意见的比例较大(25.5-37.2%)。年龄较大、女性、受教育程度较高、营养知识较多的受访者往往更支持这些举措,而且在不同国家和举措之间存在一些差异。

结论

在评估的五个国家中,大多数人对超市中鼓励健康食品选择的三种定位举措表示普遍支持。支持程度因举措类型(即产品定位或供应情况)而异,受到与国家背景和社会人口特征相关的几个因素的影响。这些证据可以促使零售商和政策制定者采取更强有力的行动,以促进商店中的健康食品选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9699/8201822/f11ec162e29d/12966_2021_1149_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9699/8201822/f11ec162e29d/12966_2021_1149_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9699/8201822/f11ec162e29d/12966_2021_1149_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Public support for healthy supermarket initiatives focused on product placement: a multi-country cross-sectional analysis of the 2018 International Food Policy Study.公众对以产品布局为重点的健康超市倡议的支持:对 2018 年国际粮食政策研究的多国横断面分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jun 14;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01149-0.
2
Parents' and carers' awareness and perceptions of UK supermarket policies on less healthy food at checkouts: A qualitative study.家长和照顾者对英国超市在结账处销售不太健康食品政策的认知和看法:一项定性研究。
Appetite. 2020 Apr 1;147:104541. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104541. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
3
The shelf space and strategic placement of healthy and discretionary foods in urban, urban-fringe and rural/non-metropolitan Australian supermarkets.澳大利亚城市、城乡结合部和农村/非大都市地区超市中健康和随意食品的货架空间和战略位置。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Feb;21(3):593-600. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003019. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
4
Availability and placement of healthy and discretionary food in Australian supermarkets by chain and level of socio-economic disadvantage.澳大利亚连锁超市中健康和可自由支配食品的供应和位置,按社会经济劣势程度划分。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Feb;24(2):203-214. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002505. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
5
A cross-sectional study of the relative availability and prominence of shelf space allocated to healthy and unhealthy foods in supermarkets in urban Ireland, by area-level deprivation.爱尔兰城市中按地区贫困程度划分的超市中健康食品和不健康食品货架空间相对可及性和突出程度的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;24(1):2689. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19671-8.
6
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.
7
Measuring Micro-Level Effects of a New Supermarket: Do Residents Within 0.5 Mile Have Improved Dietary Behaviors?衡量新超市的微观影响:0.5 英里内的居民是否改善了饮食行为?
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jun;118(6):1037-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.06.360. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
8
Does the availability of snack foods in supermarkets vary internationally?超市里零食的供应情况在国际上是否存在差异?
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 May 14;10:56. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-56.
9
The Healthiness of Food and Beverages on Price Promotion at Promotional Displays: A Cross-Sectional Audit of Australian Supermarkets.促销展示中促销食品和饮料的健康度:对澳大利亚超市的跨部门审计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 3;17(23):9026. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239026.
10
The nature of UK supermarkets' policies on checkout food and associations with healthfulness and type of food displayed: cross-sectional study.英国超市关于结账食品政策的性质及其与健康和展示食品类型的关联:横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 11;15(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0684-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Youth exposure to unhealthy digital food marketing in relation to race/ethnicity and income adequacy in Canada.加拿大青少年接触与种族/族裔和收入充足性相关的不健康数字食品营销情况。
BMC Nutr. 2025 Aug 11;11(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s40795-025-01148-5.
2
Beyond Food Safety: Taxonomization of Private Initiatives to Design of Healthier Supermarket Environments.超越食品安全:将私人举措分类以设计更健康的超市环境。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2025 May 28;14(1):71. doi: 10.1007/s13668-025-00660-1.
3
Public support for unhealthy food marketing policies in Australia: A cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Why do Latino Survey Respondents Acquiesce? Respondent and Interviewer Characteristics as Determinants of Cultural Patterns of Acquiescence among Latino Survey Respondents.为什么拉丁裔调查受访者会默认?受访者和访谈者特征作为拉丁裔调查受访者默认文化模式的决定因素。
Cross Cult Res. 2019 Feb;53(1):87-115. doi: 10.1177/1069397118774504. Epub 2018 May 16.
2
Influence of Food and Beverage Companies on Retailer Marketing Strategies and Consumer Behavior.食品和饮料公司对零售商营销策略和消费者行为的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 10;17(20):7381. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207381.
3
Availability and placement of healthy and discretionary food in Australian supermarkets by chain and level of socio-economic disadvantage.
澳大利亚公众对不健康食品营销政策的支持:2022年国际粮食政策研究的横断面分析
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2025 Apr;49(2):100231. doi: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2025.100231. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
4
Examining differences in exposure to digital marketing of unhealthy foods reported by Canadian children and adolescents in two policy environments.调查加拿大儿童和青少年在两种政策环境下报告的不健康食品数字营销接触差异。
BMC Nutr. 2025 Feb 7;11(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40795-025-01019-z.
5
Healthiness of food products promoted through placement strategies in Australian online supermarkets: a cross-sectional study.通过在澳大利亚在线超市中的定位策略来推广食品的健康性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Aug 26;22(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03557-y.
6
Support for Policies and Strategies to Promote Healthy Food Retail In-Store and Online: Perspectives From a National Sample of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participants.支持促进健康食品店内和在线零售的政策和策略:来自补充营养援助计划参与者全国样本的观点。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 Oct;56(10):681-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.06.001. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
7
Women Consumers' Views on Legislation to Restrict Prominent Placement and Multibuy Promotions of High Fat, Sugar, and Salt Products in England: A Qualitative Perspective.英国女性消费者对限制高脂肪、高糖和高盐产品在显眼位置陈列及多买促销的立法的看法:定性视角
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7597. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7597. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
8
Addressing the marketing and availability of unhealthy food and beverages in and around selected schools in Ghana: a community readiness appraisal.评估加纳部分学校及其周边地区不健康食品和饮料的营销和供应情况:社区准备度评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 28;13(9):e075166. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075166.
9
Public Support for Nutrition-Related Actions by Food Companies in Australia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Findings from the 2020 International Food Policy Study.公众对澳大利亚食品公司开展营养相关行动的支持:2020 年国际食品政策研究结果的横断面分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054054.
10
In-Store Marketing and Supermarket Purchases: Associations Overall and by Transaction SNAP Status.店内营销与超市购物:总体关联度及交易 SNAP 状况。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Oct;65(4):587-595. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.02.029. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
澳大利亚连锁超市中健康和可自由支配食品的供应和位置,按社会经济劣势程度划分。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Feb;24(2):203-214. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002505. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
4
A systematic review of the influences of food store product placement on dietary-related outcomes.食品商店产品陈列对饮食相关结果影响的系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2020 Dec 1;78(12):1030-1045. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa024.
5
What role should the commercial food system play in promoting health through better diet?商业食品系统在通过改善饮食促进健康方面应发挥什么作用?
BMJ. 2020 Mar 17;368:m545. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m545.
6
The political construction of public health nutrition problems: a framing analysis of parliamentary debates on junk-food marketing to children in Australia.公共卫生营养问题的政治建构:对澳大利亚议会关于向儿童推销垃圾食品辩论的框架分析
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Aug;23(11):2041-2052. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003628. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
7
A multi-country survey of public support for food policies to promote healthy diets: Findings from the International Food Policy Study.多国公众对促进健康饮食的食品政策支持的调查:国际食品政策研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):1205. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7483-9.
8
A Global Review of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines.全球食物膳食指南综述。
Adv Nutr. 2019 Jul 1;10(4):590-605. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy130.
9
Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.195 个国家 1990 年至 2017 年饮食风险对健康的影响:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
Assessing general public and policy influencer support for healthy public policies to promote healthy eating at the population level in two Canadian provinces.评估加拿大两个省份的公众和政策影响者对促进人口层面健康饮食的健康公共政策的支持。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jun;22(8):1492-1502. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018004068. Epub 2019 Feb 20.