Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2145, Australia.
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia.
Nutrients. 2023 Feb 22;15(5):1085. doi: 10.3390/nu15051085.
This study aimed to understand clinician, researcher and consumer views regarding factors which influence eating disorder (ED) risk during behavioral weight management, including individual risk factors, intervention strategies and delivery features. Eighty-seven participants were recruited internationally through professional and consumer organizations and social media and completed an online survey. Individual characteristics, intervention strategies (5-point scale) and delivery features (important/unimportant/unsure) were rated. Participants were mostly women (n = 81), aged 35-49 y, from Australia or United States, were clinicians and/or reported lived experience of overweight/obesity and/or ED. There was agreement (64% to 99%) that individual characteristics were relevant to ED risk, with history of ED, weight-based teasing/stigma and weight bias internalization having the highest agreement. Intervention strategies most frequently rated as likely to increase ED risk included those with a focus on weight, prescription (structured diets, exercise plans) and monitoring strategies, e.g., calorie counting. Strategies most frequently rated as likely to decrease ED risk included having a health focus, flexibility and inclusion of psychosocial support. Delivery features considered most important were who delivered the intervention (profession, qualifications) and support (frequency, duration). Findings will inform future research to quantitatively assess which of these factors predict eating disorder risk, to inform screening and monitoring protocols.
本研究旨在了解临床医生、研究人员和消费者对行为体重管理过程中影响饮食失调(ED)风险的因素的看法,包括个体风险因素、干预策略和实施特点。87 名参与者通过专业和消费者组织以及社交媒体在国际上招募,并完成了在线调查。参与者对个体特征、干预策略(五分制)和实施特点(重要/不重要/不确定)进行了评分。参与者主要为女性(n=81),年龄 35-49 岁,来自澳大利亚或美国,为临床医生,或报告有超重/肥胖和/或 ED 的经历。(64%至 99%)的参与者一致认为个体特征与 ED 风险相关,其中 ED 病史、基于体重的嘲笑/污名和体重偏见内化的认同度最高。最常被评为可能增加 ED 风险的干预策略包括关注体重、处方(结构化饮食、运动计划)和监测策略,例如计算卡路里。最常被评为可能降低 ED 风险的策略包括关注健康、灵活性和纳入心理社会支持。被认为最重要的实施特点包括实施干预的人员(专业、资质)和支持(频率、时长)。研究结果将为未来的研究提供信息,以便定量评估这些因素中哪些因素可预测 ED 风险,从而为筛查和监测方案提供信息。