Bioscience Center, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA.
Battelle Eastern Science and Technology Center, Aberdeen, MD 21001, USA.
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2023 Mar 1;76(3). doi: 10.1093/lambio/ovad033.
Efficacy of cleaning methods against SARS-CoV-2 suspended in either 5% soil load (SARS-soil) or simulated saliva (SARS-SS) was evaluated immediately (hydrated virus, T0) or 2 hours post-contamination (dried virus, T2). Hard water dampened wiping (DW) of surfaces, resulted in 1.77-3.91 log reduction (T0) or 0.93-2.41 log reduction (T2). Incorporating surface pre-wetting by spraying with a detergent solution (D + DW) or hard water (W + DW) just prior to dampened wiping did not unilaterally increase efficacy against infectious SARS-CoV-2, however, the effect was nuanced with respect to surface, viral matrix, and time. Cleaning efficacy on porous surfaces (seat fabric, SF) was low. W + DW on stainless steel (SS) was as effective as D + DW for all conditions except SARS-soil at T2 on SS. DW was the only method that consistently resulted in > 3-log reduction of hydrated (T0) SARS-CoV-2 on SS and ABS plastic. These results suggest that wiping with a hard water dampened wipe can reduce infectious virus on hard non-porous surfaces. Pre-wetting surfaces with surfactants did not significantly increase efficacy for the conditions tested. Surface material, presence or absence of pre-wetting, and time post-contamination affect efficacy of cleaning methods.
评估了针对分别悬浮有 5%土壤负荷(SARS-土壤)或模拟唾液(SARS-SS)的 SARS-CoV-2 的清洁方法的功效,即刻(水合病毒,T0)或污染后 2 小时(干燥病毒,T2)进行评估。硬水浸湿擦拭(DW)表面导致 1.77-3.91 个对数减少(T0)或 0.93-2.41 个对数减少(T2)。在浸湿擦拭之前,通过用清洁剂溶液(D+DW)或硬水(W+DW)预先对表面进行预润湿,并未单方面增加对传染性 SARS-CoV-2 的功效,但对于表面、病毒基质和时间而言,效果是细微的。在多孔表面(座椅织物,SF)上的清洁效果不佳。在所有条件下,W+DW 对不锈钢(SS)的效果均与 D+DW 相同,除了在 T2 时 SS 上的 SARS-土壤。对于 SS 和 ABS 塑料上的水合(T0)SARS-CoV-2,DW 是唯一一种始终能实现 >3 个对数减少的方法。这些结果表明,用硬水浸湿的擦拭可以减少坚硬的非多孔表面上的传染性病毒。用表面活性剂预润湿表面并未显著提高测试条件下的功效。表面材料、是否有预润湿以及污染后时间会影响清洁方法的功效。