Suppr超能文献

表面消毒的系统评价:喷雾与擦拭预防新型冠状病毒肺炎的比较

Systematic review of surface disinfection: Spraying versus wiping for COVID-19 prevention.

作者信息

Okusanya Babasola O, Gadanya Muzzammil, Nlemadim Anthony, Adaramoye Victoria, Akeju David O, Ehiri John, Meremiku Martin M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.

Nigeria Centre for Disease Control, Abuja, Nigeria.

出版信息

J Public Health Afr. 2025 Jan 28;16(2):597. doi: 10.4102/jphia.v16i2.597. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Within countries, community spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) propagated the infection despite the use of non-pharmaceutical interventions.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of disinfecting surfaces and materials in the community by spraying compared with wiping (mechanical cleaning) or nothing for SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention.

SETTING

This research was conducted in a global context.

METHOD

We searched six databases for eligible studies from 01 January 2020 to 06 September 2022. Spraying disinfectants was the intervention, while wiping or nothing was the comparison. Review outcomes include SARS-CoV-2 infection, the incidence of adverse effects and operator satisfaction. The review was registered on Prospero: CRD42022356276.

RESULTS

We found no studies that compared spraying with wiping or had human participants. Three studies with indirect evidence, published between 2021 and 2022 in Japan, South Korea and Spain, were included. Dry fog spraying of 8 700 parts per million (ppm) of hypochlorous acid solution or 56 400 ppm of hydrogen peroxide solution reduced the infectious viral titre. Wiping with 1000 ppm of sodium hypochlorite for 1 min completely reduces SARS-CoV-2 viruses on stainless steel. Also, wiping with 500 ppm of bleach for 5 min completely reduces the virus on kraft paper and polypropylene. No viruses were detected on any surface after wiping with 1000 ppm of bleach for 5 min.

CONCLUSION

This review provides basic scientific evidence that either spraying disinfectants as dry fog or wiping has some disinfectant effects on surfaces and materials.

CONTRIBUTION

Although the review included no human studies, both methods of disinfection can be practiced in the community for SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention.

摘要

背景

在各国,尽管采取了非药物干预措施,但严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的社区传播仍使感染得以蔓延。

目的

评估通过喷雾消毒社区表面和物品与擦拭(机械清洁)或不做处理相比,在预防SARS-CoV-2感染方面的效果。

背景

本研究在全球范围内开展。

方法

我们检索了6个数据库,以查找2020年1月1日至2022年9月6日的符合条件的研究。干预措施为喷雾消毒剂,对照为擦拭或不做处理。综述结果包括SARS-CoV-2感染、不良反应发生率和操作者满意度。该综述已在国际系统评价注册库(Prospero)注册:CRD42022356276。

结果

我们未找到比较喷雾与擦拭或有人类参与者的研究。纳入了2021年至2022年在日本、韩国和西班牙发表的3项有间接证据支持的研究。喷雾8700ppm的次氯酸溶液或56400ppm的过氧化氢溶液可降低病毒感染滴度。用1000ppm的次氯酸钠擦拭1分钟可完全杀灭不锈钢表面的SARS-CoV-2病毒。此外,用浓度为500ppm的漂白剂擦拭5分钟可完全杀灭牛皮纸和聚丙烯表面的病毒。用1000ppm的漂白剂擦拭5分钟后,任何表面均未检测到病毒。

结论

本综述提供了基础科学证据,即喷雾消毒剂形成干雾或擦拭对表面及物品均有一定消毒效果。

贡献

尽管本综述未纳入人体研究,但两种消毒方法均可在社区用于预防SARS-CoV-2感染。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06e5/12104846/a37075949e80/JPHIA-16-597-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验