Zhou You, Li Si-Jia, Tang Xing-Yi, He Yi-Chen, Ma Hao-Ming, Wang Ao-Qi, Pei Run-Yuan, Piao Mei-Hua
School of Nursing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No. 33 Badachu Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100433, China, 86 13522112889.
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Nov 19;10:e54297. doi: 10.2196/54297.
Since the release of ChatGPT in November 2022, this emerging technology has garnered a lot of attention in various fields, and nursing is no exception. However, to date, no study has comprehensively summarized the status and opinions of using ChatGPT across different nursing fields.
We aim to synthesize the status and opinions of using ChatGPT according to different nursing fields, as well as assess ChatGPT's strengths, weaknesses, and the potential impacts it may cause.
This scoping review was conducted following the framework of Arksey and O'Malley and guided by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). A comprehensive literature research was conducted in 4 web-based databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINHAL) to identify studies reporting the opinions of using ChatGPT in nursing fields from 2022 to September 3, 2023. The references of the included studies were screened manually to further identify relevant studies. Two authors conducted studies screening, eligibility assessments, and data extraction independently.
A total of 30 studies were included. The United States (7 studies), Canada (5 studies), and China (4 studies) were countries with the most publications. In terms of fields of concern, studies mainly focused on "ChatGPT and nursing education" (20 studies), "ChatGPT and nursing practice" (10 studies), and "ChatGPT and nursing research, writing, and examination" (6 studies). Six studies addressed the use of ChatGPT in multiple nursing fields.
As an emerging artificial intelligence technology, ChatGPT has great potential to revolutionize nursing education, nursing practice, and nursing research. However, researchers, institutions, and administrations still need to critically examine its accuracy, safety, and privacy, as well as academic misconduct and potential ethical issues that it may lead to before applying ChatGPT to practice.
自2022年11月ChatGPT发布以来,这项新兴技术在各个领域都备受关注,护理领域也不例外。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究全面总结不同护理领域使用ChatGPT的现状和观点。
我们旨在综合不同护理领域使用ChatGPT的现状和观点,并评估ChatGPT的优势、劣势以及可能产生的潜在影响。
本范围综述遵循阿克斯和奥马利的框架,并以PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的首选报告项目)为指导。在4个基于网络的数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和CINHAL)中进行了全面的文献研究,以确定2022年至2023年9月3日期间报告在护理领域使用ChatGPT观点的研究。对纳入研究的参考文献进行人工筛选,以进一步确定相关研究。两名作者独立进行研究筛选、合格性评估和数据提取。
共纳入30项研究。美国(7项研究)、加拿大(5项研究)和中国(4项研究)是发表论文最多的国家。在关注领域方面,研究主要集中在“ChatGPT与护理教育”(20项研究)、“ChatGPT与护理实践”(10项研究)以及“ChatGPT与护理研究、写作和考试”(6项研究)。六项研究涉及ChatGPT在多个护理领域的应用。
作为一种新兴的人工智能技术,ChatGPT在变革护理教育、护理实践和护理研究方面具有巨大潜力。然而,在将ChatGPT应用于实践之前,研究人员、机构和管理部门仍需严格审视其准确性、安全性和隐私性,以及可能导致的学术不端行为和潜在伦理问题。