Suppr超能文献

从国家到地方:信任问题和社区学术参与模式。

From the national to the local: Issues of trust and a model for community-academic-engagement.

机构信息

National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.

Department of Medical Education, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;11:1068425. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1068425. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Inequities in health and health care in the United States have persisted for decades, and the impacts on equity from the COVID-19 pandemic were no exception. In addition to the disproportionate burden of the disease across various populations, the pandemic posed several challenges, which exacerbated these existing inequities. This has undoubtedly contributed to deeply rooted public mistrust in medical research and healthcare delivery, particularly among historically and structurally oppressed populations. In the summer of 2020, given the series of social injustices posed by the pandemic and highly publicized incidents of police brutality, notably the murder of George Floyd, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) enlisted the help of a national collaborative, the AAMC Collaborative for Health Equity: Act, Research, Generate Evidence (CHARGE) to establish a three-way partnership that would gather and prioritize community perspectives and lived experiences from multiple regions across the US on the role of academic medicals centers (AMCs) in advancing health and social justice. Given physical gathering constraints posed by the pandemic, virtual interviews were conducted with 30 racially and ethnically diverse community members across the country who expressed their views on how medical education, clinical care, and research could or did impact their health experiences. These interviews were framed within the context of the relationship between historically oppressed groups and the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials underway. From the three-way partnership formed with the AAMC, AAMC CHARGE participants, and 30 community members from racially and ethnically diverse groups, qualitative methods provided lived experiences supporting other literature on the lack of trust between oppressed communities and AMCs. This led to the development of the Principles of Trustworthiness (PoT) Toolkit, which features ten principles inspired by community members' insights into how AMCs can demonstrate they are worthy of their community's trust. In the end, the three-way partnership serves as a successful model for other national medical and health organizations to establish community engaged processes that elicit and prioritize lived experiences describing relationships between AMCs and oppressed communities.

摘要

美国的健康和医疗保健不平等现象已经持续了几十年,新冠疫情对公平性的影响也不例外。除了疾病在不同人群中的不成比例负担外,这场大流行还带来了一些挑战,这些挑战加剧了这些现有的不平等现象。这无疑导致了公众对医学研究和医疗保健服务的深深不信任,尤其是在历史上和结构上受到压迫的人群中。2020 年夏天,鉴于疫情带来的一系列社会不公以及警察暴力行为的广泛报道,特别是乔治·弗洛伊德被谋杀事件,美国医学院协会(AAMC)借助一个全国性的合作组织,即 AAMC 促进健康和社会正义的合作、研究、生成证据(CHARGE)组织,建立了三方合作伙伴关系,从美国多个地区收集和优先考虑社区的观点和生活经验,了解学术医疗中心(AMC)在推进健康和社会正义方面的作用。由于疫情带来的实地聚会限制,与全国各地 30 名不同种族和族裔的社区成员进行了虚拟访谈,了解他们对医学教育、临床护理和研究如何或确实影响他们的健康体验的看法。这些访谈是在历史上受压迫群体与正在进行的新冠疫苗临床试验之间的关系框架内进行的。通过与 AAMC、AAMC CHARGE 参与者以及来自不同种族和族裔群体的 30 名社区成员组成的三方合作伙伴关系,定性方法提供了支持关于受压迫社区与 AMC 之间缺乏信任的其他文献的生活经验。这导致了可信度原则(PoT)工具包的开发,该工具包具有十个原则,这些原则是受社区成员对 AMC 如何展示其值得社区信任的见解启发而来的。最终,三方合作伙伴关系为其他国家医疗保健组织提供了一个成功的模式,使它们能够建立社区参与的流程,这些流程可以引出和优先考虑描述 AMC 与受压迫社区之间关系的生活经验。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Qualitative Methods in Health Care Research.医疗保健研究中的定性方法
Int J Prev Med. 2021 Feb 24;12:20. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_321_19. eCollection 2021.
6
Effective Engagement Requires Trust and Being Trustworthy.有效的参与需要信任和值得信任。
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S6-S8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000953.
7
Communities, Social Justice, and Academic Health Centers.社区、社会正义与学术健康中心
Acad Med. 2018 Jan;93(1):20-24. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001678.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验