Suppr超能文献

比较各种有机溶剂对BioDentine可回收性的疗效及其对BioDentine和牙根牙本质显微硬度的影响:一项研究。

To compare the efficacy of various organic solvents on retrievability of Biodentine and their effect on microhardness of Biodentine and radicular dentin: An study.

作者信息

Halder Niharika, Vemuri Sayesh, Guptha Anila Bandlapally Sreenivasa, Bolla Nagesh, Garlapati Roopadevi, Basam Ram Chowdary

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SIBAR Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2023 Jan-Feb;26(1):98-103. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_456_22. Epub 2022 Dec 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rotary and ultrasonic instruments are not appreciable in the complete removal of Biodentine from root canals. Therefore, organic solvents can be used as an adjunct for its retrieval.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 10% citric acid, 2% acetic acid, and 20% tartaric acid on the microhardness of Biodentine and radicular dentin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty single-rooted extracted teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction and root canals were prepared with peeso reamers. Two-millimeter sections were obtained and restored with Biodentine. All samples were subjected to Vicker's microhardness test to record the microhardness of Biodentine and radicular dentin. Samples were randomly divided into four experimental groups and treated with ( = 20) - distilled water, 10% citric acid, 2% acetic acid, and 20% tartaric acid groups for 10 min, after which specimens were again subjected to the same microhardness test.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The data were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test, followed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test with a level of significance set at ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

10% citric acid followed by 2% acetic acid exhibited the lowest mean microhardness values after immersing in respective solutions, whereas 20% tartaric acid exhibited the highest mean microhardness values on Biodentine and radicular dentin.

CONCLUSION

10% citric acid can be used for retrieving Biodentine from root canals for a limited time without adversely affecting the physical and chemical composition of radicular dentin.

摘要

背景

旋转器械和超声器械在从根管中完全去除生物活性玻璃离子水门汀方面效果不佳。因此,有机溶剂可作为辅助手段用于其取出。

目的

本研究旨在比较10%柠檬酸、2%乙酸和20%酒石酸对生物活性玻璃离子水门汀和根管牙本质微硬度的影响。

材料与方法

40颗单根离体牙在牙骨质牙釉质界处截冠,并用Peeso扩孔钻预备根管。获取2毫米厚的切片,并用生物活性玻璃离子水门汀修复。所有样本均进行维氏微硬度测试,以记录生物活性玻璃离子水门汀和根管牙本质的微硬度。样本随机分为四个实验组,分别用(每组n = 20) - 蒸馏水、10%柠檬酸、2%乙酸和20%酒石酸处理10分钟,之后样本再次进行相同的微硬度测试。

统计分析

数据采用Kruskal - Wallis方差分析检验,随后进行Wilcoxon符号秩检验,显著性水平设定为P≤0.05。

结果

浸泡在相应溶液后,10%柠檬酸其次是2%乙酸的平均微硬度值最低,而20%酒石酸在生物活性玻璃离子水门汀和根管牙本质上的平均微硬度值最高。

结论

10%柠檬酸可在有限时间内用于从根管中取出生物活性玻璃离子水门汀,而不会对根管牙本质的物理和化学组成产生不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90c0/10003285/b0884f0b7eb5/JCD-26-98-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验