• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国农业部营养证据系统评价开展系统评价的协作方法:在管理潜在利益冲突的同时促进专业知识的多样性。

USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review's collaborative approach for conducting systematic reviews: Promoting diversity of expertise while managing potential conflicts of interest.

作者信息

Obbagy Julie, Raghavan Ramkripa, Cole Natasha Chong, English Laural K, Higgins Molly, Spahn Joanne M, Bahnfleth Charlotte L, Callahan Emily, Fultz Amanda, Kim Julia H, Kingshipp Brittany J, Nevins Julie E H, Scinto-Madonich Sara R, Webster Allison, Stoody Eve

机构信息

Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) Branch, Nutrition Guidance and Analysis Division (NGAD), Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (CNPP), Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Alexandria, VA, United States.

Nutrition Guidance and Analysis Division (NGAD), Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (CNPP), Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Alexandria, VA, United States.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2023 Feb 23;10:1112868. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1112868. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2023.1112868
PMID:36908917
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9996304/
Abstract

U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review (NESR) Branch develops food-and nutrition-related systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis products. NESR has established itself as a key resource for the Federal government when making evidence-informed decisions related to public health nutrition, such as the development of the . NESR's systematic review methodology is rigorous, protocol-driven, and highly collaborative. NESR's systematic reviews examine the complex interplay between diet and health with input and support from various collaborators, including Federal stakeholders, expert groups, and public stakeholders. Implementing NESR's rigorous methodology ensures that the appropriate steps are taken to minimize conflict of interest, producing systematic reviews that are high-quality, trustworthy, and useful to end users who make decisions based on their findings. This article describes how NESR's systematic review process leverages a diversity of expertise and experience, while managing potential conflicts of interest. It describes the groups who collaborate to conduct NESR systematic reviews, their expertise, and why their involvement is critical for ensuring the rigor and utility of NESR's work.

摘要

美国农业部(USDA)营养证据系统评价(NESR)部门开展与食品和营养相关的系统评价及其他证据综合产品。NESR已成为联邦政府在做出与公共卫生营养相关的循证决策时的关键资源,例如制定……。NESR的系统评价方法严谨、以方案为导向且高度协作。NESR的系统评价在包括联邦利益相关者、专家小组和公众利益相关者在内的各种合作者的投入和支持下,研究饮食与健康之间的复杂相互作用。实施NESR严谨的方法可确保采取适当步骤将利益冲突降至最低,从而产生高质量、值得信赖且对基于其研究结果做出决策的最终用户有用的系统评价。本文描述了NESR的系统评价过程如何利用多样的专业知识和经验,同时管理潜在的利益冲突。它介绍了合作开展NESR系统评价的团体、他们的专业知识以及他们的参与为何对确保NESR工作的严谨性和实用性至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5cb/9996304/cbf3332cddef/fnut-10-1112868-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5cb/9996304/6050b70146b9/fnut-10-1112868-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5cb/9996304/cbf3332cddef/fnut-10-1112868-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5cb/9996304/6050b70146b9/fnut-10-1112868-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5cb/9996304/cbf3332cddef/fnut-10-1112868-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review's collaborative approach for conducting systematic reviews: Promoting diversity of expertise while managing potential conflicts of interest.美国农业部营养证据系统评价开展系统评价的协作方法:在管理潜在利益冲突的同时促进专业知识的多样性。
Front Nutr. 2023 Feb 23;10:1112868. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1112868. eCollection 2023.
2
Perspective: USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Methodology: Grading the Strength of Evidence in Nutrition- and Public Health-Related Systematic Reviews.观点:美国农业部营养证据系统评价方法学:对营养和公共卫生相关系统评价中证据强度进行分级。
Adv Nutr. 2022 Aug 1;13(4):982-991. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab147.
3
Systematic review methods for the Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project.《妊娠与出生至 24 个月项目的系统评价方法》。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Mar 1;109(Suppl_7):698S-704S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy226.
4
5
Strengthening Research that Answers Nutrition Questions of Public Health Importance: Leveraging the Experience of the USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Team.加强对具有公共卫生重要性的营养问题的研究:利用美国农业部营养证据系统评价团队的经验。
J Nutr. 2022 Aug 9;152(8):1823-1830. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac140.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Dietary Patterns and Health: Insights From NESR Systematic Reviews to Inform the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.膳食模式与健康:来自 NESR 系统评价的见解,为《美国人膳食指南》提供信息。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 Jan;56(1):75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2023.10.001.
8
9
USDA Nutrition Evidence Library: methodology used to identify topics and develop systematic review questions for the birth-to-24-mo population.美国农业部营养证据库:针对 0-24 月龄人群确定主题和制定系统评价问题所用的方法。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Mar;99(3):692S-6S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.071670. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Strengthening Research that Answers Nutrition Questions of Public Health Importance: Leveraging the Experience of the USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Team.加强对具有公共卫生重要性的营养问题的研究:利用美国农业部营养证据系统评价团队的经验。
J Nutr. 2022 Aug 9;152(8):1823-1830. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac140.
2
Perspective: USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Methodology: Grading the Strength of Evidence in Nutrition- and Public Health-Related Systematic Reviews.观点:美国农业部营养证据系统评价方法学:对营养和公共卫生相关系统评价中证据强度进行分级。
Adv Nutr. 2022 Aug 1;13(4):982-991. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab147.
3
Evaluation of Dietary Patterns and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review.
膳食模式与全因死亡率评估:系统综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2122277. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22277.
4
Omega-3 Fatty Acid Dietary Supplements Consumed During Pregnancy and Lactation and Child Neurodevelopment: A Systematic Review.孕期和哺乳期摄入的ω-3 脂肪酸膳食补充剂与儿童神经发育:系统评价。
J Nutr. 2021 Nov 2;151(11):3483-3494. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab238.
5
Breastfeeding and risk of overweight in childhood and beyond: a systematic review with emphasis on sibling-pair and intervention studies.母乳喂养与儿童期及以后超重风险的关系:系统评价,重点关注同胞对研究和干预研究。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Nov 8;114(5):1774-1790. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab206.
6
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.PRISMA-S:用于在系统评价中报告文献检索的 PRISMA 声明的扩展。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
7
The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 - principles and methodologies.《2022年北欧营养建议——原则与方法》
Food Nutr Res. 2020 Jun 18;64. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4402. eCollection 2020.
8
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
9
The Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project: a series of systematic reviews on diet and health.妊娠与分娩至 24 个月项目:一系列关于饮食与健康的系统评价。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Mar 1;109(Suppl_7):685S-697S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy372.
10
Systematic review methods for the Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project.《妊娠与出生至 24 个月项目的系统评价方法》。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Mar 1;109(Suppl_7):698S-704S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy226.