• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单一机构中机器人经腹腹膜前入路的一年经验:两位经验水平不同的外科医生。

One-year experience of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach in a single institute: 2 different surgeons with different levels of experience.

作者信息

Yoo Ri Na, Mun Ji Yeon, Cho Hyeon-Min, Kye Bong-Hyeon

机构信息

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent Hospital, Suwon, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Mar;104(3):176-181. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.3.176. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

DOI:10.4174/astr.2023.104.3.176
PMID:36910564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9998962/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The robotic platform, an extension of minimally invasive procedures, is distributed nationwide and readily available. However, its application in inguinal hernia repair seems rare in Korea. This report aims to share our initial experience with robotic inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

The patients who underwent robotic inguinal hernia repair by 2 different surgeons with different experiences at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical procedures were performed on all patients using the Da Vinci Xi robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc). Patient demographics, operation variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients underwent robotic inguinal hernia repairs consecutively. The mean age was 55.03 ± 18.20 years. The majority of patients were male. The overall mean operation time was 103.98 ± 47.92 minutes for unilateral hernia surgery and 139.28 ± 46.07 minutes for bilateral surgery. None of the patients experienced intraoperative complications. However, postoperative complications were noticed in 8 patients: 3 with seroma formation, 1 with hematoma, 1 with superficial surgical site infection, and 3 with persistent pain at the operation site.

CONCLUSION

This report demonstrates an early experience of hernia surgery using the robotic platform. The robotic approach for transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair was completed without any significant intraoperative or postoperative complications. It may be a viable option as a minimally invasive technique. Cost-effectiveness, optimal procedural steps, and indications for the robotic approach remain to be further investigated.

摘要

目的

机器人平台作为微创手术的延伸,已在全国范围内广泛应用且易于获取。然而,在韩国,其在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用似乎并不常见。本报告旨在分享我们在机器人腹股沟疝修补术中的初步经验。

方法

回顾性分析在单一中心由两位经验不同的外科医生进行机器人腹股沟疝修补术的患者。所有患者均使用达芬奇Xi机器人平台(直观外科公司)进行手术。分析患者的人口统计学资料、手术变量和术后结果。

结果

共有35例患者连续接受了机器人腹股沟疝修补术。平均年龄为55.03±18.20岁。大多数患者为男性。单侧疝手术的总体平均手术时间为103.98±47.92分钟,双侧手术为139.28±46.07分钟。所有患者均未发生术中并发症。然而,8例患者出现了术后并发症:3例形成血清肿,1例出现血肿,1例发生浅表手术部位感染,3例手术部位持续疼痛。

结论

本报告展示了使用机器人平台进行疝手术的早期经验。经腹腹膜前疝修补术的机器人手术方法在术中及术后均未出现任何重大并发症。作为一种微创手术技术,它可能是一种可行的选择。机器人手术方法的成本效益、最佳手术步骤和适应证仍有待进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/7aa85e1f216b/astr-104-176-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/497ff559d84b/astr-104-176-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/2a43e18e0bf8/astr-104-176-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/dcd612566039/astr-104-176-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/e88a63cbd369/astr-104-176-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/566f3a325f6e/astr-104-176-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/7aa85e1f216b/astr-104-176-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/497ff559d84b/astr-104-176-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/2a43e18e0bf8/astr-104-176-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/dcd612566039/astr-104-176-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/e88a63cbd369/astr-104-176-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/566f3a325f6e/astr-104-176-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6514/9998962/7aa85e1f216b/astr-104-176-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
One-year experience of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach in a single institute: 2 different surgeons with different levels of experience.单一机构中机器人经腹腹膜前入路的一年经验:两位经验水平不同的外科医生。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Mar;104(3):176-181. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.3.176. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
Early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective single-institution study in Korea.机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的早期疗效:韩国一项单机构回顾性研究
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Sep 15;26(3):128-133. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.128.
3
Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience.机器人腹股沟疝修补术的可行性:单机构经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4042-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4717-5. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
4
Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人腹股沟与经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:RIVAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):380-387. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.
5
Does robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) hernia repair facilitate contralateral investigation and repair without compromising patient morbidity?机器人辅助经腹腹膜前(R-TAPP)疝修补术能否在不增加患者发病率的情况下便于对侧检查和修补?
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):713-718. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0815-4. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
6
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after previous transabdominal prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗经腹前列腺切除术后。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2105-2112. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08497-9. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
Feasibility of robotic-assisted minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair in patients with urologic considerations including artificial urinary sphincters and bladder herniation.对于存在包括人工尿道括约肌和膀胱疝等泌尿外科相关情况的患者,机器人辅助微创腹股沟疝修补术的可行性。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):695-699. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01163-7. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
8
Intra-Operative Vascular Injury and Control During Laparoscopic and Robotic Mesh Explantation for Chronic Post Herniorrhaphy Inguinal Pain (CPIP).腹腔镜和机器人网片取出术治疗慢性疝修补术后腹股沟疼痛(CPIP)术中血管损伤及控制。
Surg Technol Int. 2021 May 20;38:206-211. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.38.HR1426.
9
Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后的长期生活质量及预后
J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):261-269. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0727-8. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
10
Posterior mesh inguinal hernia repairs: a propensity score matched analysis of laparoscopic and robotic versus open approaches.后入路腹股沟疝修补术:腹腔镜和机器人与开放手术的倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02680-0. Epub 2022 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society.70岁及以上和70岁以下患者经腹腹膜前入路机器人腹股沟疝修补术的临床结果:一项单机构回顾性队列研究,并代表机器人全球外科学会(TROGSS)进行全面系统综述。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 Dec 24;37(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9.
2
Robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for bilateral obturator hernia: a video vignette.机器人经腹腹膜前修补双侧闭孔疝:视频病例
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2024 Mar 15;27(1):40-43. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2024.27.1.40.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after previous transabdominal prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗经腹前列腺切除术后。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2105-2112. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08497-9. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
2
Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人腹股沟与经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:RIVAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):380-387. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.
3
Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures.
Early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective single-institution study in Korea.
机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的早期疗效:韩国一项单机构回顾性研究
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Sep 15;26(3):128-133. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.128.
常见手术中机器人手术采用趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911.
4
Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting.机器人辅助与腹腔镜缝合在模拟环境中的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3679-3689. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07263-2. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
5
Inguinal hernia surgery in Korea: nationwide data from 2007-2015.韩国的腹股沟疝手术:2007年至2015年的全国数据。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Jul;97(1):41-47. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.1.41. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
6
Transition from Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair to Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Review of a Single Surgeon's Experience.从腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术过渡到机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术:单中心回顾性研究
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2251-2257. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3998-3.
7
Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience.机器人腹股沟疝修补术的可行性:单机构经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4042-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4717-5. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
8
A survey of general surgeons regarding laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: practice patterns, barriers, and educational needs.一项针对普通外科医生的腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术调查:实践模式、障碍及教育需求。
Hernia. 2015 Oct;19(5):719-24. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1287-8. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
9
European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.欧洲疝学会关于成人腹股沟疝治疗的指南。
Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):343-403. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
10
Hernias: inguinal and incisional.疝:腹股沟疝和切口疝。
Lancet. 2003 Nov 8;362(9395):1561-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14746-0.