Suppr超能文献

方案:绘制界定和衡量仇恨犯罪、仇恨言论及仇恨事件的科学知识与方法图谱。

PROTOCOL: Mapping the scientific knowledge and approaches to defining and measuring hate crime, hate speech, and hate incidents.

作者信息

Vergani Matteo, Perry Barbara, Freilich Joshua, Chermak Steven, Scrivens Ryan, Link Rouven

机构信息

Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia.

Centre on Hate, Bias and Extremism Ontario Tech University Oshawa Ontario Canada.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 18;18(2):e1228. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1228. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

The overallaim of the review is to map the definitions and measurement tools used to capture the whole spectrum of hate motivated behaviors, including hate crime, hate speech and hate incidents. This will benefit the field of hate studies by providing a baseline that can inform the building of cumulative knowledge and comparative research. The first review objective is to map definitions of hate crime, hate incidents, hate speech, and surrogate terms. Specific research questions underpinning this objective are: (a) How are hate crimes, hate speech and hate incidents defined in the academic, legal, policy, and programming literature?; (b) What are the concepts, parameters and criteria that qualify a behavior as being hate crime, hate incident or hate speech?; and (c) What are the most common concepts, parameters and criteria found across definitions? What are the differences between definitions and the elements they contain? The second review objective is to map the tools used to measure the prevalence of hate crime, hate incidents, hate speech, and surrogate terms. Specific research questions underpinning this objective are: (a) How are definitions operationalised to measure hate crimes, hate speech, and hate incidents?; and (b) How valid and reliable are these measures?

摘要

该综述的总体目标是梳理用于涵盖仇恨动机行为全范围的定义和测量工具,包括仇恨犯罪、仇恨言论和仇恨事件。这将通过提供一个可用于积累知识和开展比较研究的基线,使仇恨研究领域受益。第一个综述目标是梳理仇恨犯罪、仇恨事件、仇恨言论及替代术语的定义。支撑这一目标的具体研究问题包括:(a)在学术、法律、政策和规划文献中,仇恨犯罪、仇恨言论和仇恨事件是如何定义的?(b)将一种行为界定为仇恨犯罪、仇恨事件或仇恨言论的概念、参数和标准是什么?(c)不同定义中最常见的概念、参数和标准有哪些?定义及其所含要素之间有何差异?第二个综述目标是梳理用于测量仇恨犯罪、仇恨事件、仇恨言论及替代术语发生率的工具。支撑这一目标的具体研究问题包括:(a)如何将定义转化为可操作的方式来测量仇恨犯罪、仇恨言论和仇恨事件?(b)这些测量方法的有效性和可靠性如何?

相似文献

6
Ingroup Empathy, Help, and Blame After Anti-LGBT+ Hate Crime.反 LGBT+ 仇恨犯罪后的群体内同理心、帮助与指责
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Sep 13;39(3-4):8862605231200212. doi: 10.1177/08862605231200212.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验