Paterson Jenny L, Walters Mark A, Hall Lisa
Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, UK.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Sep 13;39(3-4):8862605231200212. doi: 10.1177/08862605231200212.
Crimes motivated by hatred toward a person's sexual orientation or gender identity typically cause greater physical and emotional harm than comparative crimes not motivated by hate. Compounding these impacts, hate crime victims receive less empathy, less support, and are blamed more for their victimization both by society in general and by criminal justice agencies. However, as hate crimes are the epitome of intergroup hostility, the crimes are also likely to engender an ingroup empathy bias in which fellow LGBT+ people provide greater empathy to hate crime victims, potentially motivating greater support and reducing victim blaming for these particularly marginalized victims. Across three studies, we examined LGBT+ participants' empathic reactions to hate crime victims, along with their willingness to help victims and blame victims. In the Pilot Study ( = 131) and Study 1 ( = 600), we cross-sectionally showed that indirect experiences of hate crimes predicted a stronger LGBT+ identity which, in turn, was associated with greater empathy that predicted greater willingness to help victims and blame the victim less. In Study 2 ( = 657), we experimentally manipulated the motivation of a crime (hate vs. non-hate) and the group membership of the victim (ingroup-LGBT+ vs. outgroup-heterosexual) and found that crimes that had one or more group elements (i.e., involved an ingroup member and/or was motivated by hate) elicited greater empathy that, in turn, increased the willingness to help the victim and reduced victim blaming. Together, the findings provide cogent evidence that LGBT+ communities respond to anti-LGBT+ hate crimes with overwhelming empathy, and this ingroup empathy bias motivates helping behaviors and reduces victim blame, thereby buffering the marginalizing consequences of hate crimes. Policy implications include acknowledging and harnessing the importance of shared identities when practitioners and criminal justice agencies respond to anti-LGBT+ hate crimes.
因对某人的性取向或性别认同怀有仇恨而引发的犯罪,通常比非仇恨动机的同类犯罪造成更大的身体和情感伤害。这些影响还在加剧,仇恨犯罪受害者得到的同理心更少、支持更少,而且在社会大众和刑事司法机构眼中,他们因其受害遭遇而受到的指责更多。然而,由于仇恨犯罪是群体间敌意的典型体现,这类犯罪也可能引发群体内同理心偏差,即 LGBT+ 群体的成员会对仇恨犯罪受害者给予更多同理心,这有可能促使他们给予更多支持,并减少对这些特别边缘化受害者的指责。在三项研究中,我们考察了 LGBT+ 参与者对仇恨犯罪受害者的共情反应,以及他们帮助受害者和指责受害者的意愿。在预研究(N = 131)和研究 1(N = 600)中,我们通过横断面研究表明,仇恨犯罪的间接经历预示着更强烈的 LGBT+ 身份认同,而这反过来又与更强的同理心相关,这种同理心预示着更愿意帮助受害者且更少指责受害者。在研究 2(N = 657)中,我们通过实验操纵了犯罪动机(仇恨与非仇恨)以及受害者的群体成员身份(群体内 - LGBT+ 与群体外 - 异性恋),发现具有一个或多个群体因素的犯罪(即涉及群体内成员和 / 或由仇恨驱动)会引发更多同理心,进而增加帮助受害者的意愿并减少对受害者的指责。总之,研究结果提供了有力证据,表明 LGBT+ 群体以极大的同理心回应反 LGBT+ 仇恨犯罪,这种群体内同理心偏差促使了帮助行为并减少了对受害者的指责,从而缓冲了仇恨犯罪的边缘化后果。政策层面的启示包括,在从业者和刑事司法机构应对反 LGBT+ 仇恨犯罪时,要认识并利用共享身份的重要性。