Petersen Kevin, Weisburd David, Fay Sydney, Eggins Elizabeth, Mazerolle Lorraine
Department of Criminology, Law and Society George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USA.
Institute of Criminology, Faculty of Law Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 10;19(1):e1302. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1302. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Police-initiated pedestrian stops have been one of the most widely used crime prevention tactics in modern policing. Proponents have long considered police stops to be an indispensable component of crime prevention efforts, with many holding them responsible for the significant reductions in violent crime observed across major US cities in recent decades. Critics, however, have taken issue with the overuse of pedestrian stops, linking them to worsening mental and physical health, attitudes toward the police, and elevated delinquent behavior for individuals directly subject to them. To date, there has been no systematic review or meta-analysis on the effects of these interventions on crime and individual-level outcomes.
To synthesize the existing evaluation research regarding the impact of police-initiated pedestrian stops on crime and disorder, mental and physical health, individual attitudes toward the police, self-reported crime/delinquency, violence in police-citizen encounters, and police misbehavior.
We used the Global Policing Database, a repository of all experimental and quasi-experimental evaluations of policing interventions conducted since 1950, to search for published and unpublished evaluations of pedestrian stop interventions through December of 2019. This overarching search was supplemented by additional searches of academic databases, gray literature sources, and correspondence with subject-matter experts to capture eligible studies through December 2021.
Eligibility was limited to studies that included a treatment group of people or places experiencing pedestrian stops and a control group of people or places not experiencing pedestrian stops (or experiencing a lower dosage of pedestrian stops). Studies were required to use an experimental or quasi-experimental design and evaluate the intervention using an outcome of area-level crime and disorder, mental or physical health, individual or community-level attitudes toward the police, or self-reported crime/delinquency.
We adopted standard methodological procedures expected by the Campbell Collaboration. Eligible studies were grouped by conceptually similar outcomes and then analyzed separately using random effects models with restricted maximum likelihood estimation. Treatment effects were represented using relative incident rate ratios, odds ratios, and Hedges' effect sizes, depending on the unit of analysis and outcome measure. We also conducted sensitivity analyses for several outcome measures using robust variance estimation, with standard errors clustered by each unique study/sample. Risk of bias was assessed using items adapted from the Cochrane randomized and non-randomized risk of bias tools.
Our systematic search strategies identified 40 eligible studies corresponding to 58 effect sizes across six outcome groupings, representing 90,904 people and 20,876 places. Police-initiated pedestrian stop interventions were associated with a statistically significant 13% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -16%, -9%, < 0.001) reduction in crime for treatment areas relative to control areas. These interventions also led to a diffusion of crime control benefits, with a statistically significant 7% (95% CI: -9%, -4%, < 0.001) reduction in crime for treatment displacement areas relative to control areas. However, pedestrian stops were also associated with a broad range of negative individual-level effects. Individuals experiencing police stops were associated with a statistically significant 46% (95% CI: 24%, 72%, < 0.001) increase in the odds of a mental health issue and a 36% (95% CI: 14%, 62%, < 0.001) increase in the odds of a physical health issue, relative to control. Individuals experiencing police stops also reported significantly more negative attitudes toward the police ( = -0.38, 95% CI: -0.59, -0.17, < 0.001) and significantly higher levels of self-reported crime/delinquency ( = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.48, < 0.001), equating to changes of 18.6% and 15%, respectively. No eligible studies were identified measuring violence in police-citizen encounters or officer misbehavior. While eligible studies were often considered to be at moderate to high risk of bias toward control groups, no significant differences based on methodological rigor were observed. Moderator analyses also indicated that the negative individual-level effects of pedestrian stops may be more pronounced for youth, and that significant differences in effect sizes may exist between US and European studies. However, these moderator analyses were limited by a small number of studies in each comparison, and we were unable to compare the effects of police stops across racial groupings.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: While our findings point to favorable effects of pedestrian stop interventions on place-based crime and displacement outcomes, evidence of negative individual-level effects makes it difficult to recommend the use of these tactics over alternative policing interventions. Recent systematic reviews of hot spots policing and problem-oriented policing approaches indicate a more robust evidence-base and generally larger crime reduction effects than those presented here, often without the associated backfire effects on individual health, attitudes, and behavior. Future research should examine whether police agencies can mitigate the negative effects of pedestrian stops through a focus on officer behavior during these encounters.
警方发起的行人拦截行动一直是现代警务中使用最广泛的预防犯罪策略之一。长期以来,支持者一直认为警方拦截是预防犯罪工作不可或缺的组成部分,许多人认为这是近几十年来美国各大城市暴力犯罪显著减少的原因。然而,批评者对行人拦截的过度使用提出了质疑,将其与心理健康和身体健康状况恶化、对警察的态度以及直接受到拦截的个人犯罪行为增加联系起来。迄今为止,尚未对这些干预措施对犯罪和个人层面结果的影响进行系统综述或荟萃分析。
综合现有评估研究,探讨警方发起的行人拦截行动对犯罪和混乱、心理健康和身体健康、个人对警察的态度、自我报告的犯罪/违法行为、警察与公民互动中的暴力行为以及警察不当行为的影响。
我们使用了全球警务数据库,该数据库收录了自1950年以来对警务干预措施进行的所有实验性和准实验性评估,以搜索截至2019年12月已发表和未发表的行人拦截干预措施评估。通过对学术数据库、灰色文献来源进行额外搜索,并与主题专家通信,对这一总体搜索进行补充,以获取截至2021年12月的符合条件的研究。
纳入标准仅限于那些研究,其中包括经历行人拦截的人群或地点的治疗组以及未经历行人拦截(或经历较低剂量行人拦截)的人群或地点的对照组。研究必须采用实验性或准实验性设计,并使用区域层面的犯罪和混乱、心理健康或身体健康、个人或社区层面对警察的态度或自我报告的犯罪/违法行为等结果来评估干预措施。
我们采用了坎贝尔合作组织期望的标准方法程序。符合条件的研究按概念上相似的结果进行分组,然后使用限制最大似然估计的随机效应模型分别进行分析。根据分析单位和结果测量方法,治疗效果用相对发生率比、优势比和赫奇斯效应大小来表示。我们还使用稳健方差估计对几个结果测量进行了敏感性分析,标准误差按每个独特的研究/样本进行聚类。使用从Cochrane随机和非随机偏倚风险工具改编的项目评估偏倚风险。
我们的系统搜索策略确定了40项符合条件的研究,对应六个结果分组中的58个效应大小,涉及90,904人和20,876个地点。与对照组相比,警方发起的行人拦截干预措施使治疗区域的犯罪率在统计学上显著降低了13%(95%置信区间[CI]:-16%,-9%,<0.001)。这些干预措施还导致了犯罪控制效益的扩散,与对照组相比,治疗替代区域的犯罪率在统计学上显著降低了7%(95%CI:-9%,-4%,<0.001)。然而,行人拦截也与一系列广泛的负面个人层面影响相关。与对照组相比,经历警方拦截的个人出现心理健康问题的几率在统计学上显著增加了46%(95%CI:24%,72%,<0.001),出现身体健康问题的几率增加了36%(95%CI:14%,62%,<0.001)。经历警方拦截的个人对警察的负面态度也显著更多(= -0.38,95%CI:-0.59,-0.17,<0.001),自我报告的犯罪/违法行为水平也显著更高(= 0.30,95%CI:0.12,0.48,<0.001),分别相当于变化了18.6%和15%。未发现有符合条件的研究测量警察与公民互动中的暴力行为或警察不当行为。虽然符合条件的研究通常被认为对对照组存在中度至高偏倚风险,但未观察到基于方法严谨性的显著差异。调节分析还表明,行人拦截对个人层面的负面影响可能对年轻人更为明显,并且美国和欧洲的研究在效应大小上可能存在显著差异。然而,这些调节分析受到每个比较中研究数量较少的限制,并且我们无法比较警方拦截对不同种族群体的影响。
虽然我们的研究结果表明行人拦截干预措施对基于地点的犯罪和替代结果有积极影响,但负面个人层面影响的证据使得难以推荐使用这些策略而非其他警务干预措施。最近对热点警务和问题导向警务方法的系统综述表明,与这里呈现的相比,有更强大的证据基础,通常犯罪减少效果更大,而且往往不会对个人健康、态度和行为产生相关的适得其反的影响。未来的研究应该探讨警察机构是否可以通过关注这些互动中的警察行为来减轻行人拦截的负面影响。