Suppr超能文献

如果在猪身上进行测定,动物基底汉堡中的可消化必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS)高于植物基底汉堡。

Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) is greater in animal-based burgers than in plant-based burgers if determined in pigs.

机构信息

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.

Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Nutr. 2022 Feb;61(1):461-475. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02658-1. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Determine digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) for animal- and plant-based burgers and test the hypothesis that DIAAS calculated for a burger and a burger bun is additive in a combined meal.

METHODS

Ten ileal cannulated gilts were fed experimental diets for six 9-d periods with ileal digesta being collected on d 8 and 9 of each period. Six diets contained a burger (i.e., 80% lean beef, 93% lean beef, 80% lean pork, Impossible Burger, or Beyond Burger) or a burger bun as the sole source of crude protein and amino acids. Three additional diets were based on a combination of the bun and 80% beef, pork, or Impossible Burger. A nitrogen-free diet was also used. The DIAAS for all ingredients and mixed meals was calculated for children from 6 months to 3 years and for individuals older than 3 years, and DIAAS for combined meals was predicted from individual ingredient DIAAS.

RESULTS

The 93% lean beef and the pork burgers had greater (P < 0.05) DIAAS than the plant-based burgers for both age groups. The 80% lean beef burger had greater (P < 0.05) DIAAS than the plant burgers for children from 6 months to 3 years, and greater (P < 0.05) DIAAS than the Beyond Burger for individuals older than 3 years. There were no differences between the measured and predicted DIAAS.

CONCLUSIONS

The protein quality of animal-based burgers is greater than that of plant-based burgers. However, for individuals older than 3 years, the Impossible Burger has comparable protein quality to the 80% lean beef burger. The DIAAS obtained from individual foods is additive in mixed meals.

摘要

目的

确定动物源和植物源汉堡的可消化必需氨基酸评分(DIAAS),并检验汉堡和汉堡面包组合膳食中 DIAAS 可加性的假设。

方法

10 头回肠可插管的母猪接受 6 个 9 天期的实验日粮,每个时期的第 8 和第 9 天收集回肠食糜。6 种日粮仅包含汉堡(即 80%精瘦牛肉、93%精瘦牛肉、80%精瘦猪肉、Impossible Burger 或 Beyond Burger)或汉堡面包作为粗蛋白和氨基酸的唯一来源。另外 3 种日粮基于面包和 80%牛肉、猪肉或 Impossible Burger 的组合。还使用了无氮饮食。为 6 个月至 3 岁的儿童以及 3 岁以上的个体计算了所有成分和混合膳食的 DIAAS,并根据单个成分的 DIAAS 预测了组合膳食的 DIAAS。

结果

对于两个年龄组,93%精瘦牛肉和猪肉汉堡的 DIAAS 均高于植物源汉堡(P<0.05)。对于 6 个月至 3 岁的儿童,80%精瘦牛肉汉堡的 DIAAS 高于植物汉堡(P<0.05),对于 3 岁以上的个体,DIAAS 高于 Beyond Burger(P<0.05)。实测和预测的 DIAAS 之间没有差异。

结论

动物源汉堡的蛋白质质量优于植物源汉堡。然而,对于 3 岁以上的个体,Impossible Burger 的蛋白质质量与 80%精瘦牛肉汉堡相当。单独食物获得的 DIAAS 在混合膳食中是可加的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验