Fears B A, Gerkovich M M, O'Connell K A, Cook M R
Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, MO 64110.
Health Psychol. 1987;6(6):561-8. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.6.6.561.
Salivary samples from three placement sites and under stimulated and unstimulated flow-rate conditions were collected from 36 participants (18 smokers, 18 nonsmokers) on each of 3 days. These samples were used to determine the best collection methodology for discriminating smokers from nonsmokers, the reliability of salivary thiocyanate (SCN) over days, and the stability of SCN given varying storage treatments. Results showed that SCN levels were significantly higher in smokers than in nonsmokers, in parotid site collections than either sublingual or mixed collections, and in unstimulated collections. Stimulated, mixed samples were reliable across days and were the best discriminator of smokers and nonsmokers. SCN levels did not differ under varying storage treatments. It is recommended that a standard methodology for collecting stimulated, mixed saliva be used when measuring SCN levels.
在3天中的每一天,从36名参与者(18名吸烟者,18名非吸烟者)身上采集来自三个采集部位、在刺激和非刺激流速条件下的唾液样本。这些样本用于确定区分吸烟者和非吸烟者的最佳采集方法、唾液硫氰酸盐(SCN)随时间的可靠性以及不同储存处理下SCN的稳定性。结果表明,吸烟者的SCN水平显著高于非吸烟者,腮腺部位采集的样本高于舌下或混合采集的样本,非刺激采集的样本中SCN水平也更高。刺激后的混合样本在不同时间是可靠的,并且是区分吸烟者和非吸烟者的最佳指标。不同储存处理下SCN水平没有差异。建议在测量SCN水平时使用采集刺激后混合唾液的标准方法。