Metastasis of breast cancer to bones alters the tumor immune microenvironment.

BACKGROUND

Bone is one of the most frequent sites for breast cancer metastasis. Breast cancer bone metastasis (BCBM) leads to skeletal morbidities including pain, fractures, and spinal compression, all of which severely impact quality of life. Immunotherapy is a promising therapy for patients with advanced cancer, but whether it may provide benefit to metastatic bone cancer is currently unknown. Thus, a better understanding of the immune landscape of bone-disseminated breast cancers may reveal new therapeutic strategies. In this study, we use histopathological analysis to investigate changes within the immune microenvironment of primary breast cancer and paired BCBM.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients with BCBM, including 31 with paired primary and bone metastatic lesions, were included in our study. The percentage of stroma and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was evaluated by histopathological analysis. The quantification of stromal TILs (CD4 + and CD8 +), macrophages (CD68 + and HLA-DR +), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) was evaluated through immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Statistical analysis was performed with paired t test, Wilcoxon test, spearman correlation test, and univariate and multivariate cox regression.

RESULTS

Median survival after BCBM pathological diagnosis was 20.5 months (range: 3-95 months). Of the immune parameters measured, none correlated with survival after bone metastasis was diagnosed. Compared to the primary site, bone metastases exhibited more tumor stroma (mean: 58.5% vs 28.87%, p < 0.001) and less TILs (mean: 8.45% vs 14.03%, p = 0.042), as determined by H&E analysis. The quantification of primary vs metastatic tissue area with CD4 + (23.95/mm vs 51.69/mm, p = 0.027 and with CD8 + (18.15/mm vs 58.95/mm, p = 0.004) TILs similarly followed this trend and was reduced in number for bone metastases. The number of CD68 + and HLA-DR + macrophages showed no significant difference between primary sites and bone metastases. PD-1 expression was present in 68.25% of the bone metastasis, while PD-L1 expression was only present in 7.94% of the bone metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that compared to the primary breast cancer site, bone metastases harbor a less active immune microenvironment. Despite this relatively dampened immune landscape, expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in the bone metastasis indicates a potential benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors for some BCBM cases.