Li Han, Zheng Yue, Peng Xin, Liu Hui, Li Yue, Tian Zhaoxin, Hou Yang, Jin Shiqi, Huo Huaibi, Liu Ting
Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Mar 1;13(3):1723-1739. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-793. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
This study aimed to explore the value of cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking (CMR-TT) technology in evaluating heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with chronic myocardial infarction (CMI).
Between June 2016 and March 2022, we included a consecutive series of 92 patients with CMI and 40 healthy controls in this retrospective study. The CMI patients enrolled were divided into different subgroups [HFpEF-CMI group (n=54) and non- heart failure (HF)-CMI group (n=38)] according to the Heart Failure Association (HFA)-PEFF (step 1: P, pre-test assessment; step 2: E, echocardiography and natriuretic peptide score; step 3: F1, functional testing; step 4: F2, final aetiology) diagnostic algorithm. CMR scan was performed at the First Hospital of China Medical University. Quantitative measurements of myocardial damage, such as myocardial strain parameters of both ventricles derived by CMR-TT and infarct size and transmurality by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), were assessed. One-way analysis of variance, independent samples test, and rank sum test were used to compare myocardial impairment among groups. Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient was used to measure correlations between left ventricular (LV) strains and clinical and functional parameters. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were performed to identify the best parameter for diagnosing HFpEF-CMI.
HFpEF-CMI patients demonstrated significantly impaired LV strains and strain rates in all of the three directions (radial, circumferential and longitudinal) compared to non-HF-CMI patients and healthy controls (P<0.001 for all), whereas only global longitudinal strain (GLS) was significantly impaired in HFpEF-CMI patients . controls for right ventricular strain parameters (P<0.001). LV strains showed moderate correlation with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (radial, circumferential and longitudinal strain, R=-0.401, R=0.408, R=0.407, respectively, P<0.001 for all). LV strains in the three directions (radial, circumferential and longitudinal) [area under ROC curve (AUC) =0.707, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.603-0.797; AUC =0.708, 95% CI: 0.604-0.798; AUC =0.731, 95% CI: 0.628-0.818; respectively, P<0.01 for all] were discriminators for HFpEF-CMI and non-HF-CMI. LV strains and myocardial infarction volume were independent factors in multi-logistic regression analysis after adjusting for body mass index, age, and sex (P<0.05 for all).
CMR-TT provides clinicians with useful additional imaging parameters to facilitate the assessment of CMI patients with HFpEF. LV strain parameters can detect early cardiac insufficiency in patients with HFpEF-CMI and have potential value for discriminating between HFpEF and non-HF patients post-CMI.
本研究旨在探讨心脏磁共振组织追踪(CMR-TT)技术在评估慢性心肌梗死(CMI)患者射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)中的价值。
在2016年6月至2022年3月期间,我们在这项回顾性研究中纳入了连续的92例CMI患者和40例健康对照。根据心力衰竭协会(HFA)-PEFF(第一步:P,预测试评估;第二步:E,超声心动图和利钠肽评分;第三步:F1,功能测试;第四步:F2,最终病因)诊断算法,将纳入的CMI患者分为不同亚组[HFpEF-CMI组(n = 54)和非心力衰竭(HF)-CMI组(n = 38)]。在中国医科大学附属第一医院进行CMR扫描。评估心肌损伤的定量测量,如通过CMR-TT得出的双心室心肌应变参数以及通过延迟钆增强(LGE)得出的梗死面积和透壁性。采用单因素方差分析、独立样本检验和秩和检验比较各组之间的心肌损伤。使用Pearson或Spearman相关系数测量左心室(LV)应变与临床和功能参数之间的相关性。进行逻辑回归分析和受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析以确定诊断HFpEF-CMI的最佳参数。
与非HF-CMI患者和健康对照相比,HFpEF-CMI患者在所有三个方向(径向、圆周和纵向)的LV应变和应变率均显著受损(所有P<0.001),而HFpEF-CMI患者仅整体纵向应变(GLS)显著受损。右心室应变参数的对照组(P<0.001)。LV应变与N末端脑钠肽前体呈中度相关(径向、圆周和纵向应变,R分别为-0.401、0.408、0.407,所有P<0.001)。三个方向(径向、圆周和纵向)的LV应变[ROC曲线下面积(AUC)=0.707,95%置信区间(CI):0.603 - 0.797;AUC =0.708,95%CI:0.604 - 0.798;AUC =0.731,95%CI:0.628 - 0.818;所有P<0.01]是HFpEF-CMI和非HF-CMI的鉴别指标。在调整体重指数、年龄和性别后,LV应变和心肌梗死体积在多逻辑回归分析中是独立因素(所有P<0.05)。
CMR-TT为临床医生提供了有用的额外影像学参数,以促进对CMI合并HFpEF患者的评估。LV应变参数可以检测HFpEF-CMI患者的早期心脏功能不全,并且在鉴别CMI后HFpEF和非HF患者方面具有潜在价值。