ChatGPT: the next frontier in academic writing for cardiologists or a pandora's box of ethical dilemmas.
作者信息
Marchandot Benjamin, Matsushita Kensuke, Carmona Adrien, Trimaille Antonin, Morel Olivier
机构信息
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
UMR 1260, INSERM (French National Institute of Health and Medical Research), Regenerative Nanomedicine, FMTS, 1 rue Eugene Boeckel, Strasbourg 67000, France.
出版信息
Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Feb 13;3(2):oead007. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead007. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
ChatGPT: the next frontier in academic writing for cardiologists or a pandora's box of ethical dilemmas.ChatGPT：心脏病专家学术写作的下一个前沿领域，还是一个充满伦理困境的潘多拉魔盒。
Eur Heart J Open. 2023 Feb 13;3(2):oead007. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oead007. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
AI Is Changing the Landscape of Academic Writing: What Can Be Done? Authors' Reply to: AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on "Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora's Box Has Been Opened".人工智能正在改变学术写作的格局：我们能做些什么？作者回复：人工智能增加了全面改革科学同行评审过程的压力。对“人工智能可以生成看似真实但具有欺诈性的科学医学文章：潘多拉魔盒已经打开”的评论
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 31;25:e50844. doi: 10.2196/50844.
3
ChatGPT in forensic sciences: a new Pandora's box with advantages and challenges to pay attention.法医学中的ChatGPT：一个需关注其优势与挑战的新潘多拉魔盒。
Forensic Sci Res. 2023 Nov 10;8(4):275-279. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owad039. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on "Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora's Box Has Been Opened".人工智能加大了全面改革科学同行评审过程的压力。对《人工智能可生成看似真实但实则欺诈的科学医学文章：潘多拉魔盒已被打开》的评论
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 31;25:e50591. doi: 10.2196/50591.
5
From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing.从人类写作到人工智能生成的文本：审视ChatGPT在学术写作中的前景与潜在威胁。
Biol Sport. 2023 Apr;40(2):615-622. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
6
Open Science and Software Assistance: Commentary on "Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora's Box Has Been Opened".开放科学与软件辅助：评“人工智能可以生成虚假但看起来真实的科学医学文章：潘多拉魔盒已经打开”。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 31;25:e49323. doi: 10.2196/49323.
7
Consulting ChatGPT: Ethical dilemmas in language model artificial intelligence.咨询ChatGPT：语言模型人工智能中的伦理困境。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 Apr;90(4):879-880. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.02.052. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
8
Artificial intelligence in medicine: Promethean moment or Pandora's box?医学中的人工智能：是普罗米修斯时刻还是潘多拉魔盒？
N Z Med J. 2023 Sep 15;136(1582):11-13. doi: 10.26635/6965.e1582.
9
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Double-edged Sword or a Pandora's Box?医学中的人工智能：双刃剑还是潘多拉魔盒？
Oman Med J. 2023 Sep 28;38(5):e542. doi: 10.5001/omj.2023.129. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
How Chatbots and Large Language Model Artificial Intelligence Systems Will Reshape Modern Medicine: Fountain of Creativity or Pandora's Box?聊天机器人和大语言模型人工智能系统将如何重塑现代医学：创造力之源还是潘多拉魔盒？
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jun 1;183(6):596-597. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1835.
引用本文的文献
1
Nurse Researchers' Experiences and Perceptions of Generative AI: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study.护士研究者对生成式人工智能的体验与认知：定性半结构化访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 25;27:e65523. doi: 10.2196/65523.
2
Tips and tricks to evaluate the impact of ChatGPT in scientific writing.评估ChatGPT在科学写作中影响的技巧和窍门。
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025 Mar 25;3(1):qyaf035. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf035. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Evaluating the Accuracy of Responses by Large Language Models for Information on Disease Epidemiology.评估大语言模型对疾病流行病学信息回答的准确性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Feb;34(2):e70111. doi: 10.1002/pds.70111.
4
Revolutionizing Health Care: The Transformative Impact of Large Language Models in Medicine.变革医疗保健：大语言模型在医学领域的变革性影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 7;27:e59069. doi: 10.2196/59069.
5
Applications of ChatGPT in Heart Failure Prevention, Diagnosis, Management, and Research: A Narrative Review.ChatGPT在心力衰竭预防、诊断、管理及研究中的应用：一项叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 27;14(21):2393. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212393.
6
Generative artificial intelligence writing open notes: A mixed methods assessment of the functionality of GPT 3.5 and GPT 4.0.生成式人工智能撰写开放式病历：对GPT 3.5和GPT 4.0功能的混合方法评估
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 29;10:20552076241291384. doi: 10.1177/20552076241291384. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
Open E-survey on the Use and Perception of Chatbots in Vascular Surgery.关于血管外科中聊天机器人使用情况及认知的开放式电子调查
EJVES Vasc Forum. 2024 Jul 16;62:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.07.037. eCollection 2024.
8
Effectiveness of ChatGPT 4.0 in Telemedicine-Based Management of Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma.ChatGPT 4.0在基于远程医疗的转移性前列腺癌管理中的有效性。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;14(17):1899. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171899.
9
ChatGPT and Medical Research: A Meta-Synthesis of Opportunities and Challenges.ChatGPT与医学研究：机遇与挑战的元综合分析
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024 Jul 1;12(3):135-147. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2024.101068.1910. eCollection 2024 Jul.
10
ChatGPT in medicine: A cross-disciplinary systematic review of ChatGPT's (artificial intelligence) role in research, clinical practice, education, and patient interaction.ChatGPT 在医学领域的应用：对 ChatGPT（人工智能）在研究、临床实践、教育和医患互动中的作用的跨学科系统评价。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 9;103(32):e39250. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039250.
本文引用的文献
1
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove.研究论文将ChatGPT列为作者：许多科学家表示反对。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7945):620-621. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z.
2
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists.由ChatGPT撰写的摘要愚弄了科学家。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7944):423. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7.
Zotero 插件