• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常听力成人的啁啾与声爆发和 click 诱发的咬肌前庭诱发肌源性电位比较。

Comparison of Chirp Versus Tone Burst- and Click-Evoked Masseteric Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Normal-Hearing Adults.

机构信息

School of Audiology & Speech-Language Pathology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, India.

出版信息

Am J Audiol. 2023 Jun;32(2):303-313. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00155. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00155
PMID:36917064
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed at comparing narrowband Claus Elberling level-specific chirp (NB CE-Chirp)-, click-, and tone burst-evoked masseteric vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (mVEMPs).

METHOD

Within-group study design and purposive sampling were performed. A total of 25 normal-hearing individuals participated in the study. The zygomatic electrode montage was used to elicit ipsilateral mVEMP responses using a 500-Hz NB CE-Chirp, a click of 100-μs duration, and a 500-Hz tone burst stimulus. Each of the responses was analyzed based on the absolute peak latency of P11 and N21, the electromyography-scaled peak-to-peak amplitude of the P11-N21 complex, and the interaural asymmetry ratio.

RESULTS

A total of 50 ears were tested and had 100% mVEMP responses. The latencies of click-evoked and 500-Hz NB CE-Chirp-evoked mVEMPs were significantly shorter than those of 500-Hz tone burst-evoked mVEMPs ( < .05) for both ears. It revealed a significantly superior P11-N21 amplitude of the 500-Hz NB CE-Chirp and tone burst than clicks for both ears. Intraclass correlation coefficient revealed moderate to excellent test-retest reliability for mVEMP parameters across three different stimulations.

CONCLUSION

The present study supports 500 Hz NB CE-Chirps as effective and reliable stimuli as tone bursts in eliciting mVEMP responses.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较窄带 Claus Elberling 频率特异性啁啾(NB CE-Chirp)、click 和 tone burst 诱发的咬肌前庭诱发肌源性电位(mVEMP)。

方法

采用组内研究设计和目的性抽样方法。共有 25 名听力正常的个体参与了这项研究。使用颧电极放置方式,使用 500 Hz 的 NB CE-Chirp、100 μs 时长的 click 和 500 Hz 的 tone burst 刺激来诱发同侧 mVEMP 反应。根据 P11 和 N21 的绝对峰潜伏期、P11-N21 复合波的肌电图标度峰峰值幅度以及耳间对称比分析每个反应。

结果

共测试了 50 只耳朵,100%的 mVEMP 反应。对于双耳,click 诱发和 500 Hz NB CE-Chirp 诱发的 mVEMPs 的潜伏期明显短于 500 Hz 的 tone burst 诱发的 mVEMPs(<0.05)。对于双耳,500 Hz 的 NB CE-Chirp 和 tone burst 诱发的 P11-N21 幅度明显优于 clicks。对于三个不同刺激,内类相关系数显示 mVEMP 参数的测试-重测可靠性为中等到极好。

结论

本研究支持 500 Hz 的 NB CE-Chirp 作为诱发 mVEMP 反应的有效和可靠刺激,与 tone burst 相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Chirp Versus Tone Burst- and Click-Evoked Masseteric Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Normal-Hearing Adults.正常听力成人的啁啾与声爆发和 click 诱发的咬肌前庭诱发肌源性电位比较。
Am J Audiol. 2023 Jun;32(2):303-313. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00155. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
2
Tone Burst Masseter Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials: Normative Values and Test-Retest Reliability.声刺激咬肌前庭诱发肌源性电位:正常值和测试-重测信度。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2021 May;32(5):308-314. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1728718. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
3
Comparison of Compressed High-Intensity Radar Pulse and Tone Burst Stimulation in Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Acute Peripheral Vestibular System Pathologies.比较急性外周前庭系统病变中压缩高强度雷达脉冲和啁啾刺激在前庭诱发肌源性电位中的应用。
J Int Adv Otol. 2023 Mar;19(2):130-139. doi: 10.5152/iao.2023.21560.
4
Comparison of Multifrequency Narrow-Band CE-Chirp and Tone Burst Evoked Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.多频窄带CE-啁啾与短纯音诱发的颈性前庭诱发肌源性电位的比较
J Am Acad Audiol. 2023 Mar;34(3-04):56-64. doi: 10.1055/a-2036-0510. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
5
Multifrequency Narrowband Chirp Evoked Cervical Vestibular Myogenic Potentials: Evaluation of Responses in Normal-Hearing Young Adults.多频窄带啁啾声诱发颈前庭肌源性电位:正常听力青年的反应评估。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Dec 5;31(4):1191-1201. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00073. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
6
Effect of Electrode Montage on 500-Hz Tone Burst Evoked Masseter Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential.电极安置方式对 500Hz 短音爆发刺激下颌肌前庭诱发肌源性电位的影响。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Jun 2;31(2):403-410. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00016. Epub 2022 May 10.
7
Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential: A comparison of narrowband chirp, broadband chirp, tone burst and click stimulation.颈源性和眼源性前庭诱发肌源性电位:窄带啁啾、宽带啁啾、短声刺激和 click 刺激的比较。
Int J Audiol. 2023 Jun;62(6):579-586. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2064924. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
8
Characteristics of ipsilateral, contralateral and bilateral masseter vestibular-evoked myogenic potential in healthy adults.健康成年人同侧、对侧及双侧咬肌前庭诱发肌源性电位的特征。
J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Dec;137(12):1359-1367. doi: 10.1017/S0022215123000051. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
9
Differences in bone conduction ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to 500 Hz narrow band chirp stimulus and 500 Hz tone burst.500赫兹窄带啁啾刺激和500赫兹短纯音诱发的骨传导性眼前庭诱发肌源性电位的差异。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Aug;48(4):590-593. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
10
Multifrequency Analysis of Masseter Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Young Adults.年轻人咀嚼肌前庭诱发肌源性电位的多频分析。
Am J Audiol. 2023 Dec 4;32(4):843-852. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJA-23-00028. Epub 2023 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Air Conduction and Bone Conduction Masseter Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Between Neurotypical Young Adults and Individuals With Conductive Hearing Loss.听力正常的年轻成年人与传导性听力损失个体之间气导和骨导咬肌前庭诱发肌源性电位的比较。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 26;16(9):e70267. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70267. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Masseter Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: A new tool to assess the vestibulomasseteric reflex pathway.咬肌前庭诱发肌源性电位:一种评估前庭咬肌反射通路的新工具。
J Otol. 2024 Jan;19(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2023.12.005. Epub 2023 Dec 29.