Suppr超能文献

草药的药物警戒:关注问题与未来前景。

Pharmacovigilance of herbal medicines: Concerns and future prospects.

机构信息

University Institute of Pharma Sciences (UIPS), Chandigarh University, Mohali, 140413, Punjab, India.

University Institute of Pharma Sciences (UIPS), Chandigarh University, Mohali, 140413, Punjab, India.

出版信息

J Ethnopharmacol. 2023 Jun 12;309:116383. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.116383. Epub 2023 Mar 12.

Abstract

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

The use of herbal medicines for prophylaxis, prevention, and treatment of various ailments is rising throughout the world because they are thought to be safer than allopathic treatments, which they are. However, several investigations have documented the toxicity and adverse drug reactions (ADR) of certain formulations and botanicals if not consumed wisely.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The goal of the current study is to address herbal medication pharmacovigilance (PV) modeling and related considerations for improved patient safety. Also, focus is laid on the comprehensive and critical analysis of the current state of PV for herbal medications at the national and international levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Targeted review also known as focused literature review methodology was utilized for exploring the data from various scientific platforms such as Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, Springer, PubMed, Google Scholar using "pharmacovigilance, herbal medicine, traditional medicine, ADR, under reporting, herb toxicity, herb interactions" as keywords along with standard literature pertaining to herbal medicines that is published by the WHO and other international and national organizations etc. The botanical names mentioned in the present article were authenticated using World Flora Online database.

RESULTS

The historical developments paving the way for PV in regulatory setup were also discussed, along with various criteria's for monitoring herbal medicine, ADR of herbs, phytoconstituents, and traditional medicines, herb-drug interactions, modes of reporting ADR, databases for reporting ADR's, provisions of PV in regulatory framework of different nations, challenges and way forward in PV are discussed in detail advocating a robust drug safety ecosystem for herbal medicines.

CONCLUSION

Despite recent efforts to encourage the reporting of suspected ADRs linked to herbal medicines, such as expanding the programme and adding community pharmacists and other healthcare professionals as recognized reporters, the number of herbal ADR reports received by the regulatory bodies remains comparatively low. Since users often do not seek professional advice or report if they have side effects, under-reporting, is anticipated to be significant for herbal medications. There are inadequate quality control methods, poor regulatory oversight considering herbs used in food and botanicals, and unregulated distribution channels. In addition, botanical identity, traceability of herbs, ecological concerns, over-the-counter (OTC) herbal medicines, patient-physicians barriers requires special focus by the regulatory bodies for improved global safety of herbal medicines.

摘要

民族药理学相关性

由于草药被认为比对抗疗法更安全,因此在全球范围内,人们越来越多地将其用于预防、预防和治疗各种疾病。然而,一些调查已经记录了某些配方和植物的毒性和药物不良反应 (ADR),如果使用不当,这些药物就会产生不良反应。

研究目的

本研究旨在解决草药药物警戒 (PV) 建模问题,并考虑相关因素,以提高患者安全性。此外,还重点关注对国家和国际一级草药药物 PV 的现状进行全面和批判性分析。

材料和方法

利用靶向综述(也称为重点文献综述方法),从科学直接、威利在线图书馆、施普林格、PubMed、谷歌学者等各种科学平台上探索数据,使用“药物警戒、草药、传统医学、ADR、报告不足、草药毒性、草药相互作用”作为关键词,以及世界卫生组织和其他国际和国家组织等发布的与草药相关的标准文献。本文中提到的植物名称使用世界植物区系在线数据库进行了验证。

结果

还讨论了为监管框架中的 PV 铺平道路的历史发展,以及监测草药、草药 ADR、植物成分和传统医学、草药-药物相互作用、ADR 报告模式、ADR 报告数据库、不同国家监管框架中的 PV 规定、PV 面临的挑战和前进方向等各种标准,倡导建立一个强大的草药药物安全生态系统。

结论

尽管最近努力鼓励报告与草药相关的可疑 ADR,例如扩大计划并将社区药剂师和其他医疗保健专业人员添加为认可报告者,但监管机构收到的草药 ADR 报告数量仍然相对较低。由于使用者通常在出现副作用时不会寻求专业建议或报告,因此预计草药的报告不足会很严重。草药的质量控制方法不足,对用于食品和植物药的草药的监管监督不足,以及不受监管的分销渠道。此外,植物学身份、草药的可追溯性、生态问题、非处方 (OTC) 草药、患者-医生障碍都需要监管机构特别关注,以提高草药的全球安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验