Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology and Forensicare, Alphington, Victoria, Australia.
Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Assessment. 2023 Dec;30(8):2560-2579. doi: 10.1177/10731911231153838. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
Due to recent legal cases highlighting a lack of cross-ethnicity validity research using correctional risk assessment tools, we evaluated psychometric properties of Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-entry (DRAOR) scores across Māori ( = 1,812) and New Zealand (NZ) European samples ( = 1,211) in Aotearoa NZ. Using routine administrative data, our analyses suggested scoring properties were invariant across ethnicity for 15 of 19 items. Discrimination properties were also equivalent, but we observed a higher recidivism base rate among Māori participants, consistent with official statistics. Consequently, calibration analyses using a fixed follow-up ( = 372) demonstrated higher predicted recidivism rates for Māori participants at each DRAOR score. This suggests that Māori participants with similar levels of DRAOR-assessed need factors as NZ European participants experienced relatively greater continued justice contact. DRAOR users should prioritize delivering quality case management to clients, recognizing that both case-specific and systemic factors may underlie differential base rates.
由于最近的一些法律案件强调了在使用矫正风险评估工具时缺乏跨种族有效性研究,我们评估了动态罪犯再入风险评估 (DRAOR) 评分在新西兰毛利族(n=1812)和新西兰欧洲裔样本(n=1211)中的心理测量特性。使用常规行政数据,我们的分析表明,在 19 个项目中有 15 个项目的评分特性在种族间是不变的。歧视特性也是等效的,但我们观察到毛利参与者的累犯率基数较高,这与官方统计数据一致。因此,使用固定随访(n=372)的校准分析表明,在每个 DRAOR 评分上,毛利参与者的预测累犯率更高。这表明,在 DRAOR 评估的需求因素方面与新西兰欧洲裔参与者水平相似的毛利参与者经历了相对更多的持续司法接触。DRAOR 用户应该优先为客户提供高质量的案件管理,认识到案件特定因素和系统因素可能是导致累犯率差异的基础。