• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生文化松紧取向量表的编制

Development of the Cultural Tightness-Looseness Orientation Scale for College Students.

作者信息

Sun Shuwei, Zhang Haiyan

机构信息

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

Business School, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Mar 9;16:665-681. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S402850. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S402850
PMID:36923298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10010131/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

"The cultural tightness-looseness orientation of college students", which involves college students' cognition about tolerance for non-learning-behavior in class, strength of learning-behavior norms in class, and strength of social norms in the generalized macro-context, offers a new perspective to explain college students' psychology and behavior and could effectively promote their all-round development. However, there is severely lack of a reliable and valid instrument. Hence, we seek to develop the Cultural Tightness-Looseness Orientation Scale for College Students (CTLOS-S) in the Chinese context.

METHODS

We firstly pooled the initial 17 measuring items of CTLOS-S through literature review and the open-ended interview. After conducting questionnaire survey among 264 college students using the initial scale, we did a series of reliability and validity tests to get the formal CTLOS-S, based on which we further administered questionnaire survey among 755 college students to check its reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, content validity, and across-gender invariance.

RESULTS

The formal CTLOS-S contains 7-item subscale of tolerance orientation for non-learning-behavior in class, 4-item subscale of strength orientation of learning-behavior norms in class, and 3-item subscale of strength orientation of social norms in the generalized macro-context. The testing results of the second-stage questionnaire survey data (N = 755) demonstrate that the reliability coefficients of CTLOS-S and its three subscales are 0.85, 0.85, 0.83, and 0.76 separately, the internal 3-factor structure validity of CTLOS-S is satisfactorily acceptable with (74) = 318.76, CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.06, and SRMR = 0.04, and the content validity and criterion validity are satisfactory as the total score of CTLOS-S is positively correlated with each score of its three subscales and the total score of learning engagement scale. Besides, the 3-factor structure of CTLOS-S is invariant across gender.

CONCLUSION

The 14-item CTLOS-S we develop is a reliable and valid instrument for researchers to conduct quantitative studies on college students' cultural tightness-looseness orientation.

摘要

背景

“大学生文化松紧取向”涉及大学生对课堂上非学习行为的容忍度认知、课堂学习行为规范的强度以及广义宏观背景下社会规范的强度,为解释大学生的心理和行为提供了新视角,能有效促进其全面发展。然而,严重缺乏可靠且有效的测量工具。因此,我们试图在中国背景下编制大学生文化松紧取向量表(CTLOS-S)。

方法

我们首先通过文献回顾和开放式访谈汇总了CTLOS-S最初的17个测量项目。在对264名大学生使用初始量表进行问卷调查后,我们进行了一系列信效度检验以得到正式的CTLOS-S,在此基础上,我们进一步对755名大学生进行问卷调查,以检验其信度、结构效度、效标效度、内容效度和跨性别不变性。

结果

正式的CTLOS-S包括课堂非学习行为容忍取向的7项分量表、课堂学习行为规范强度取向的4项分量表以及广义宏观背景下社会规范强度取向的3项分量表。第二阶段问卷调查数据(N = 755)的测试结果表明,CTLOS-S及其三个分量表的信度系数分别为0.85、0.85、0.83和0.76,CTLOS-S的内部三因素结构效度令人满意,χ²(74) = 318.76,CFI = 0.94,TLI = 0.93,RMSEA = 0.06,SRMR = 0.04,且内容效度和效标效度令人满意,因为CTLOS-S的总分与其三个分量表的各分数以及学习投入量表的总分呈正相关。此外,CTLOS-S的三因素结构在性别上具有不变性。

结论

我们编制的14项CTLOS-S是研究人员对大学生文化松紧取向进行定量研究的可靠且有效的工具。

相似文献

1
Development of the Cultural Tightness-Looseness Orientation Scale for College Students.大学生文化松紧取向量表的编制
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Mar 9;16:665-681. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S402850. eCollection 2023.
2
Validation of the Chinese Cultural Tightness-Looseness Scale and General Tightness-Looseness Scale.中国文化松紧度量表和一般松紧度量表的验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 18;14:1131868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131868. eCollection 2023.
3
Development of Chinese college students' perception teacher differential behavior scale and its reliability and validity test.发展中国大学生感知教师差异化行为量表及其信度和效度检验。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 12;12(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01973-6.
4
Development and initial validation of the Career Self-Management scale for Chinese coaches.中国教练职业自我管理量表的编制与初步验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 15;14:1160584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1160584. eCollection 2023.
5
Measuring self-as-context in Chinese college students: Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of self-as-context scale (C-SACS).测量中国大学生的自我即情境:中文版自我即情境量表(C-SACS)的效度和信度
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 6;13:1051661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051661. eCollection 2022.
6
Korean Version of the 17-Item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for University Students: A Validity and Reliability Study.大学生17项乌得勒支工作投入量表韩语版:效度与信度研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;10(4):642. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040642.
7
Validity evaluation of the Health Information Preferences Questionnaire among college students.大学生健康信息偏好问卷的有效性评估。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 27;12:1249621. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1249621. eCollection 2024.
8
Cultural tightness-looseness and normative social influence in eight Asian countries: Associations of individual and collective norms with vaccination intentions.文化紧密度和规范性社会影响在八个亚洲国家:个体和集体规范与疫苗接种意愿的关联。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;340:116431. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116431. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
9
[Reliability and validity of the WeChat addiction scale in college students].[微信成瘾量表在大学生中的信效度研究]
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2021 Jul;50(4):572-577. doi: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2021.04.007.
10
Validation of the Chinese version of the COVID-19 Phobia Scale among Chinese college students.中文版新冠恐惧症量表在中国大学生中的效度验证
Heliyon. 2023 Mar;9(3):e13468. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13468. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The (in)congruence effects of organizational green compensation and employee green conscientiousness on pro-environmental behavior: evidence from China.组织绿色薪酬与员工绿色自觉对环保行为的(不)一致效应:来自中国的证据。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 5;12(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02122-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Detrimental Effect of the Characteristic-Human-Capital-Inputs-Based Horizontal Pay Dispersion on Team Member Work Role Performance via Employee Benign and Malicious Envy: An Evidence from China.基于特征人力资本投入的横向薪酬差距通过员工良性和恶意嫉妒对团队成员工作角色绩效的不利影响:来自中国的证据
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Oct 21;15:3097-3116. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S383969. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) Among Medical College Students.评估中文版十项人格量表(TIPI)在医科大学生中的心理测量学特性。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 May 16;15:1247-1258. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S357913. eCollection 2022.
3
Perceptions of the appropriate response to norm violation in 57 societies.57 个社会对规范违反应采取何种适当回应的看法。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 5;12(1):1481. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21602-9.
4
The relationship between cultural tightness-looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis.文化紧密-宽松度与 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数之间的关系:全球分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Mar;5(3):e135-e144. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30301-6. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
5
Zero-Sum Construal of Workplace Success Promotes Initial Work Role Behavior by Activating Prevention Focus: Evidence From Chinese College and University Graduates.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 30;11:1191. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01191. eCollection 2020.
6
A global analysis of cultural tightness in non-industrial societies.非工业社会的文化紧张度的全球分析。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jul 8;287(1930):20201036. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1036. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
7
Status anxiety mediates the positive relationship between income inequality and sexualization.地位焦虑在收入不平等与性化之间的正相关关系中起中介作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 10;116(50):25029-25033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909806116. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
8
Relative Deprivation and Relative Wealth Enhances Anti-Immigrant Sentiments: The V-Curve Re-Examined.相对剥夺与相对财富加剧反移民情绪:对V型曲线的重新审视
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 13;10(10):e0139156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139156. eCollection 2015.
9
Tightness-looseness across the 50 united states.50 个州的紧松度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 3;111(22):7990-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317937111. Epub 2014 May 19.
10
The role of culture-gene coevolution in morality judgment: examining the interplay between tightness-looseness and allelic variation of the serotonin transporter gene.文化-基因共同进化在道德判断中的作用:审视社会规范松紧程度与血清素转运体基因等位基因变异之间的相互作用。
Cult Brain. 2013;1(2):100-117. doi: 10.1007/s40167-013-0009-x. Epub 2013 Aug 29.