• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估中文版十项人格量表(TIPI)在医科大学生中的心理测量学特性。

Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) Among Medical College Students.

作者信息

Shi Zhao, Li Shunping, Chen Gang

机构信息

Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.

NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 May 16;15:1247-1258. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S357913. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S357913
PMID:35603350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9121988/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) was designed as a brief instrument of the Big Five personality traits. This study aimed to explore the internal consistency and structural validity of the Chinese version of TIPI (TIPI-C) in medical college students.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 11 provinces of China. Spearman-Brown coefficient, standardized Cronbach's α coefficient, and Cronbach's α coefficient were applied to estimate the internal consistency. Spearman-Brown coefficient was applied to estimate split-half reliability. Principal components analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to identify the structural validity.

RESULTS

A total of 2223 medical college students recruited from different regions of China were included. The Spearman-Brown coefficients of TIPI-C ranged from 0.129 to 0.786 and the Cronbach's α coefficients ranged from 0.119 to 0.785. The split-half reliability of the Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.508. The latent structure of Extraversion, Emotional Stability, and Conscientiousness complied with the intended structure, and the internal consistency coefficients of these three traits were supported. However, the internal consistency coefficients of Agreeableness and Openness were low and the structural validity was not supported.

CONCLUSION

TIPI-C primarily stands out as a feasible instrument for brief measurements of the Extraversion, Emotional Stability, and Conscientiousness domains. Further research is required to evaluate the concurrent validity and the test-retest reliability of TIPI-C in different populations and potentially modify the instrument to be more suitable for the Chinese population.

摘要

目的

十项人格量表(TIPI)被设计为一种测量大五人格特质的简短工具。本研究旨在探讨中文版TIPI(TIPI-C)在医学生中的内部一致性和结构效度。

方法

在中国11个省份进行了一项横断面研究。采用斯皮尔曼-布朗系数、标准化克朗巴哈α系数和克朗巴哈α系数来估计内部一致性。应用斯皮尔曼-布朗系数来估计分半信度。采用主成分分析(PCA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)来确定结构效度。

结果

共纳入了来自中国不同地区的2223名医学生。TIPI-C的斯皮尔曼-布朗系数范围为0.129至0.786,克朗巴哈α系数范围为0.119至0.785。斯皮尔曼-布朗系数的分半信度为0.508。外向性、情绪稳定性和尽责性的潜在结构符合预期结构,这三个特质的内部一致性系数得到了支持。然而,宜人性和开放性的内部一致性系数较低,且结构效度未得到支持。

结论

TIPI-C主要是一种用于简短测量外向性、情绪稳定性和尽责性领域的可行工具。需要进一步研究来评估TIPI-C在不同人群中的同时效度和重测信度,并可能对该工具进行修改,使其更适合中国人群。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) Among Medical College Students.评估中文版十项人格量表(TIPI)在医科大学生中的心理测量学特性。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 May 16;15:1247-1258. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S357913. eCollection 2022.
2
Internal Consistency and Structural Validity of the Norwegian Translation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.十项人格量表挪威语翻译版的内部一致性和结构效度
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 11;12:723852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723852. eCollection 2021.
3
Short Scales for the Assessment of Personality Traits: Development and Validation of the Portuguese Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI).人格特质评估简短量表:葡萄牙十项人格量表(TIPI)的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 5;9:461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00461. eCollection 2018.
4
The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI): a scoping review of versions, translations and psychometric properties.十项人格量表(TIPI):关于版本、翻译及心理测量特性的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 26;14:1202953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202953. eCollection 2023.
5
The Turkish Adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.《十项人格量表的土耳其语改编版》
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Dec;50(4):312-319. doi: 10.4274/npa.y6128. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
6
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
7
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
8
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
9
[Normative data of middle-aged and older Japanese adults for the the Japanese version of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J)].[日本版十项人格量表(TIPI-J)的日本中老年成年人常模数据]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2018;65(7):356-363. doi: 10.11236/jph.65.7_356.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of social anxiety scale for social media users and cross-sectional investigation into this disorder among college students.社交媒体用户社交焦虑量表中文版的心理测量学评估及大学生该障碍横断面调查。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;116:152328. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2022.152328. Epub 2022 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Animal Video Lovers Always Have Company: The Role of Cyber-Mediated Animal Attachment in Loneliness.动物视频爱好者总有陪伴:网络介导的动物依恋在孤独中的作用。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Sep 4;15(17):2593. doi: 10.3390/ani15172593.
2
Associations Between Personality Traits, Self-Efficacy and Complementary Feeding Behavior Among Infant Caregivers in Western Rural China.中国西部农村地区婴幼儿照料者的人格特质、自我效能感与辅食喂养行为之间的关联
Matern Child Nutr. 2025 Jul;21(3):e70021. doi: 10.1111/mcn.70021. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
3
Predictors of depression among Chinese college students: a machine learning approach.中国大学生抑郁症的预测因素:一种机器学习方法。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21632-8.
4
Big-five personality traits and depression: chain mediation of self-efficacy and walking.大五人格特质与抑郁症:自我效能感和步行的链式中介作用
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 29;15:1460888. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1460888. eCollection 2024.
5
Highest order moderation of extraversion and neuroticism into the relationship between job stress and flourishing: Mediated by readiness to change among Chinese medical teachers.外向性和神经质对工作压力与蓬勃发展之间关系的最高阶调节作用:以中国医学教师的改变意愿为中介
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 25;10(13):e33405. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33405. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
6
Mental toughness in adolescents: bridging family relationships and depression across personality traits.青少年的心理韧性:跨越人格特质的家庭关系与抑郁的桥梁。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Apr 17;12(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01702-z.
7
Mapping the terrain: a scoping review of empirical studies on the big five personality traits and QoL in China.绘制版图:对中国关于大五人格特质与生活质量的实证研究的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 12;14:1335657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1335657. eCollection 2023.
8
Prejudice and determinants regarding tuberculosis patients among medical students in Dalian, Northeast China: a cross-sectional study.中国东北大连市医学生对肺结核患者的偏见及其决定因素:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 10;11:1292333. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1292333. eCollection 2023.
9
Pain Assessment in Oral Medicine through Its Different Dimensions: A Comprehensive Review.口腔医学中疼痛评估的不同维度:一项综述
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;11(11):246. doi: 10.3390/dj11110246.
10
Person-centered care: preferences and predictors in speech-language pathology and audiology practitioners.以患者为中心的护理:言语病理学和听力学从业者的偏好及预测因素
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 30;14:1162588. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1162588. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Internal Consistency and Structural Validity of the Norwegian Translation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.十项人格量表挪威语翻译版的内部一致性和结构效度
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 11;12:723852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723852. eCollection 2021.
2
Job preferences of undergraduate pharmacy students in China: a discrete choice experiment.中国本科生对药学工作岗位的偏好:离散选择实验。
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Jul 6;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00626-8.
3
Disentangling stereotypes from social reality: Astrological stereotypes and discrimination in China.从社会现实中厘清刻板印象:中国的占星术刻板印象和歧视。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Dec;119(6):1359-1379. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000237. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Measuring the Burden of Schizophrenia Using Clinician and Patient-Reported Measures: An Exploratory Analysis of Construct Validity.使用临床医生和患者报告的测量方法衡量精神分裂症的负担:对构念效度的探索性分析。
Patient. 2019 Aug;12(4):405-417. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00358-x.
5
Job preferences for healthcare administration students in China: A discrete choice experiment.中国医疗管理专业学生的工作偏好:离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0211345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211345. eCollection 2019.
6
Job preferences of undergraduate nursing students in eastern China: a discrete choice experiment.中国东部本科护生工作偏好的离散选择实验研究
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Jan 3;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0335-3.
7
Job preferences for medical students in China: A discrete choice experiment.中国医学生的职业偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(38):e12358. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012358.
8
Does Medical Students' Personality Traits Influence Their Attitudes toward Medical Errors?医学生的个性特质会影响他们对医疗差错的态度吗?
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Aug 17;6(3):101. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6030101.
9
Short Scales for the Assessment of Personality Traits: Development and Validation of the Portuguese Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI).人格特质评估简短量表:葡萄牙十项人格量表(TIPI)的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 5;9:461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00461. eCollection 2018.
10
The urinary-specific quality of life of multiple sclerosis patients: Dutch translation and validation of the SF-Qualiveen.多发性硬化症患者的尿特异性生活质量:SF-Qualiveen 的荷兰语翻译和验证。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Aug;36(6):1629-1635. doi: 10.1002/nau.23168. Epub 2016 Oct 29.