Caron Théo, Bernard Paquito, Gadais Tegwen
Faculté des Sports et de l'EP, Université D'Artois, Liévin, France.
Département des Sciences de l'activité physique, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Feb 27;4:906857. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.906857. eCollection 2022.
In the last couple of decades, numerous intervention strategies (ISs) have been formulated in school/community or clinical sectors using physical activity (PA) in order to prevent youth obesity because they have been highly effective in addressing this issue. These two sectors have revealed some interesting information in terms of efficient results and best practice mechanisms, but comparisons between them to learn about their functioning have been rare.
Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to analyze and synthesize PA ISs from school/community or clinical domains for the period 2013-2017, in French or English, targeting youths aged 5-19 years old through primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.
In total, 68 full articles were reserved for data extraction and synthesis and 617 were excluded because they did not meet eligibility criteria (61 of 68 were kept for the final analysis). The results identified a number of differences between the studies of the various IS sectors and also a third type of IS, mixed sector. Mixed ISs (clinical and school-community) have a special advantage because they can benefit from the strengths of both school/community-based and clinical-based ISs. Mixed ISs showed the most promising results. This review also highlighted the differences between sectors and their ISs in terms of intervention teams, prevention objectives, duration, materials, and efficiency.
Future studies should focus on establishing a prevention program in a given geographical area involving all stakeholders with their respective skills/knowledge, in the area of decision-making and in the development of ISs, to ensure that the program is the most efficient and best adapted to its environment.
在过去几十年里,学校/社区或临床领域制定了许多干预策略(ISs),利用体育活动(PA)来预防青少年肥胖,因为这些策略在解决这一问题上非常有效。这两个领域在有效成果和最佳实践机制方面透露了一些有趣的信息,但对它们进行比较以了解其运作情况的研究却很少。
因此,本系统综述的目的是分析和综合2013年至2017年期间来自学校/社区或临床领域的体育活动干预策略,这些策略以法语或英语呈现,通过一级、二级和三级预防针对5至19岁的青少年。
总共保留了68篇全文用于数据提取和综合,排除了617篇,因为它们不符合纳入标准(68篇中的61篇留作最终分析)。结果确定了各干预策略领域研究之间的一些差异,还有第三种干预策略类型,即混合领域。混合干预策略(临床和学校 - 社区)具有特殊优势,因为它们可以受益于基于学校/社区和基于临床的干预策略的优势。混合干预策略显示出最有前景的结果。本综述还强调了各领域及其干预策略在干预团队、预防目标、持续时间、材料和效率方面的差异。
未来的研究应侧重于在特定地理区域建立一个预防计划,让所有利益相关者凭借各自的技能/知识参与决策领域和干预策略的制定,以确保该计划是最有效且最适应其环境的。