Department of Poultry Science, Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Department of Poultry Science, Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Poult Sci. 2023 May;102(5):102584. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102584. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
Commercial hatch cabinet environments promote replication of microorganisms. These pathogenic or apathogenic microorganisms may serve as pioneer colonizers of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of poultry. Some of these pioneer colonizers, such as Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp., are opportunistic pathogens that lead to reduced performance in commercial poultry. Effective hatchery sanitation is imperative to limit contamination of naïve neonatal chicks and poults. Formaldehyde fumigation has been traditionally used to reduce the pathogen load in commercial hatch cabinets. To investigate potential alternatives to formaldehyde fumigation, models to mimic the microbial bloom in a laboratory setting must be utilized. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the impact of a multispecies environmental challenge model (PM challenge) with and without formaldehyde fumigation during the hatching phase on early performance in broiler chicks. Three experiments were conducted to evaluate microbial contamination in the hatch cabinet environment (air samples, fluff samples), enteric colonization at day-of-hatch (DOH), and 7-day performance. In all experiments, significantly (P < 0.05) more gram-negative bacteria were recovered from the GIT at DOH in the PM challenge control group as compared to the nonchallenged control (NC) group and the formaldehyde-treated group (PM + F). There were no statistical differences in 7-day body weight gain or feed conversion ratio between the PM challenge control group, the NC group or the PM + F group. These data suggest this model could be utilized to evaluate alternatives to formaldehyde fumigation for controlling the microbial load during the hatching phase in a laboratory setting.
商用孵化箱环境促进微生物的复制。这些病原性或非病原性微生物可能作为家禽胃肠道(GIT)的先驱定植者。这些先驱定植者中的一些,如大肠杆菌和肠球菌属,是机会性病原体,导致商业家禽的性能下降。有效的孵化场卫生对于限制新生雏鸡和幼禽的污染至关重要。甲醛熏蒸传统上用于减少商业孵化箱中的病原体负荷。为了研究甲醛熏蒸的潜在替代品,必须利用模拟实验室中微生物爆发的模型。本研究的目的是评估孵化阶段是否进行多物种环境挑战模型(PM 挑战)以及是否进行甲醛熏蒸对肉鸡雏鸡早期性能的影响。进行了三项实验来评估孵化箱环境中的微生物污染(空气样本、绒毛样本)、孵化时的肠定植(DOH)和 7 天性能。在所有实验中,与未受挑战的对照组(NC 组)和甲醛处理组(PM+F 组)相比,PM 挑战对照组在 DOH 时从 GIT 中回收的革兰氏阴性菌明显(P<0.05)更多。PM 挑战对照组、NC 组或 PM+F 组之间的 7 天体重增重或饲料转化率没有统计学差异。这些数据表明,该模型可用于评估甲醛熏蒸替代物,以控制实验室环境中孵化阶段的微生物负荷。