Department of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.
Department of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.
Poult Sci. 2021 Mar;100(3):100975. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.072. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
Horizontal transmission of opportunistic Escherichia coli during hatch can have detrimental effects on early performance, particularly as pioneer colonizers. Commercially, formaldehyde is often applied in the United States to combat the bacterial bloom that occurs inside of the hatching environment. The purpose of these experiments was to develop a replicable E. coli horizontal challenge model to evaluate alternatives to formaldehyde sanitation applied to the hatching environment. In experiment 1, two trials were conducted for 2 wild-type (WT) E. coli isolates (isolate 1 [I1] or isolate 2 [I2]) to determine the appropriate in ovo challenge dose and day of embryogenesis (DOE) for challenge administration. In experiment 1 trial 1, the most appropriate inoculation dose and time point were determined to be 10 cfu/embryo on DOE 19. Experiment 1 trial 2 evaluated whether placement of seeder (direct-challenged) embryos with contact (indirect-challenged) embryos during hatch affected contact hatchability. Trial 2 showed no differences in hatchability between groups. A 7-day experiment (experiment 1 trial 2) was conducted to evaluate the effects of I1 or I2 on horizontal transmission, gram-negative bacterial (GNB) recovery from the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and impact on BW gain (BWG). Compared with the negative control, seeder, and contact chicks challenged with I1 or I2, we observed increased (P < 0.05) GNB recovered from GIT on the day of hatch. There was a marked (P < 0.05) reduction in 7-day BWG between the I1 indirect-challenged group and the negative control group. To further validate the model, 2 7-day trials (experiment 2, experiment 3) were conducted to evaluate the effects of formaldehyde fumigation on coliform recovery from the hatching environment and on early performance using I1 for the challenge. Isolate 1 positive control hatchers had increased levels of circulating coliforms compared with the negative control and formaldehyde-treated hatchers, although there was no significant impact on performance induced by challenge or formaldehyde treatment in experiment 2 or experiment 3. These data provide a potential model for investigations related to horizontal transmission of WT E. coli at a low dose on DOE 19 to promote simulated commercially relevant bacterial blooms under laboratory conditions.
在孵化期间,机会性大肠杆菌的水平传播会对早期性能产生不利影响,尤其是作为先驱定植者。在美国,商业上通常使用甲醛来对抗孵化环境内发生的细菌爆发。这些实验的目的是开发一种可复制的大肠杆菌水平挑战模型,以评估替代甲醛消毒应用于孵化环境的方法。在实验 1 中,进行了两次试验,以评估两个野生型(WT)大肠杆菌分离株(分离株 1 [I1]或分离株 2 [I2]),以确定合适的胚胎内挑战剂量和胚胎发生日(DOE)进行挑战管理。在实验 1 试验 1 中,确定了最合适的接种剂量和时间点为 10cfu/胚胎在 DOE 19。实验 1 试验 2 评估了在孵化期间放置种鸡(直接挑战)胚胎与接触(间接挑战)胚胎是否会影响接触孵化率。试验 2 显示两组间孵化率无差异。进行了为期 7 天的实验(实验 1 试验 2),以评估 I1 或 I2 对水平传播、从胃肠道(GIT)中回收革兰氏阴性菌(GNB)以及对体重增加(BWG)的影响。与阴性对照、种鸡和接触小鸡相比,我们观察到在孵化当天从 GIT 中回收的 GNB 增加(P<0.05)。I1 间接挑战组与阴性对照组之间的 7 天 BWG 明显降低(P<0.05)。为了进一步验证该模型,进行了 2 个 7 天试验(实验 2、实验 3),以评估甲醛熏蒸对孵化环境中大肠菌群回收的影响,以及使用 I1 进行挑战对早期性能的影响。与阴性对照和甲醛处理的孵化器相比,I1 阳性对照孵化器中的循环大肠菌群水平升高,尽管在实验 2 或实验 3 中,挑战或甲醛处理对性能没有显著影响。这些数据为在低剂量的 DOE 19 下进行 WT 大肠杆菌的水平传播研究提供了一种潜在模型,以促进在实验室条件下模拟商业相关的细菌爆发。