Suppr超能文献

一氧化碳中毒预后的定量瞳孔光反射评估

Quantitative pupillary light reflex assessment for prognosis of carbon monoxide poisoning.

作者信息

Cha Yong Sung, Ko Sang-Bae, Go Tae-Hwa, Lee Dong Keon

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea.

Research Institute of Hyperbaric Medicine and Science, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 28;10:1105705. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1105705. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A non-reactive pupil in standard pupillary light reflex (sPLR) is regarded as a factor predicting neurological sequelae at 1-month after carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. An automated pupillometer is used in the intensive care unit to quantitatively assess PLR. Quantitative PLR (qPLR) was superior to sPLR using penlight for prognosis of various neurological diseases. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze whether quantitative pupillary variables (neurological Pupil index [NPi] and qPLR) are superior to sPLR in predicting 1-month neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of consecutive patients with acute CO poisoning admitted to an emergency department (ED) between August 2019 and December 2020 in a single academic medical center. sPLR and pupillometer examinations (qPLR and NPi) were performed by emergency physicians at the ED on hospital days 0-2. The lowest values among those recorded within 24 h and during the total measurement period were considered the 24-h and total lowest values, respectively. Global Deterioration Scale scores were measured at 1 month as an outcome and were dichotomized into favorable (1-4) or poor (5-7) outcomes.

RESULTS

We analyzed the data of 104 adult patients with acute CO poisoning. qPLR was significantly higher in the favorable outcome group than in the poor outcome group 24-h and total lowest values (21.2% vs. 15.0%,  = 0.006 and 21.0% vs. 14.8%,  = 0.006). qPLR <18% had fair predictive power for poor neurocognitive outcomes [area under the curve (AUC), 0.70; 95% confidence interval (0.60-0.78)]. Among the patients with decreased mental status (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤12), the power of NPi and qPLR increased [AUC, 0.72 and AUC, 0.80]. NPi < 1 and qPLR <18% showed sensitivity (9.5% vs. 76.2%) and specificity (98.8% vs. 67.5%) for the prediction of poor outcomes. qPLR was significantly superior to sPLR in predicting poor neurocognitive outcomes at 1 month after CO poisoning ( = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

qPLR and NPi were superior to sPLR in terms of predicting poor neurocognitive outcomes. qPLR and NPi measured from hospital days 0-2 may be valuable in predicting neurocognitive outcome.

摘要

背景

标准瞳孔对光反射(sPLR)中无反应的瞳孔被视为一氧化碳(CO)中毒后1个月时神经后遗症的预测因素。重症监护病房使用自动瞳孔计定量评估对光反射(PLR)。定量瞳孔对光反射(qPLR)在各种神经系统疾病的预后方面优于使用手电筒的sPLR。因此,本研究旨在分析定量瞳孔变量(神经瞳孔指数[NPi]和qPLR)在预测急性CO中毒后1个月的神经认知后遗症方面是否优于sPLR。

方法

我们对2019年8月至2020年12月期间在一家学术医疗中心急诊科收治的急性CO中毒连续患者进行了前瞻性观察研究。急诊科的急诊医生在住院第0 - 2天进行sPLR和瞳孔计检查(qPLR和NPi)。24小时内记录的最低值和整个测量期间的最低值分别被视为24小时最低值和总最低值。在1个月时测量总体恶化量表评分作为结果,并分为良好(1 - 4)或不良(5 - 7)结果。

结果

我们分析了104例急性CO中毒成年患者的数据。良好结果组的qPLR在24小时最低值和总最低值时显著高于不良结果组(21.2%对15.0%,P = 0.006;21.0%对14.8%,P = 0.006)。qPLR <18%对不良神经认知结果具有较好的预测能力[曲线下面积(AUC),0.70;95%置信区间(0.60 - 0.78)]。在精神状态下降(格拉斯哥昏迷量表≤12)的患者中,NPi和qPLR的预测能力增强[AUC分别为0.72和0.80]。NPi <1且qPLR <18%在预测不良结果时显示出敏感性(9.5%对76.2%)和特异性(98.8%对67.5%)。在预测CO中毒后1个月的不良神经认知结果方面,qPLR显著优于sPLR(P = 0.007)。

结论

qPLR和NPi在预测不良神经认知结果方面优于sPLR。在住院第0 - 2天测量的qPLR和NPi可能对预测神经认知结果有价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f629/10011084/fd536a052854/fmed-10-1105705-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验