Palley H A
University of Maryland, School of Social Work and Community Planning, Baltimore 21201.
Int J Health Serv. 1987;17(4):595-616. doi: 10.2190/1X9F-4Q4H-FE89-5MUE.
The Quebec and Ontario health insurance and health service delivery systems, developed within the parameters of federal regulations and national financial subsidies, provide generally universal and comprehensive basic hospital and medical benefits and increasingly provide for the delivery of long-term care services. Within a framework of cooperative federalism, the health care systems of Ontario and Quebec have developed uniquely. In terms of vital statistics, the health of Ontario and Quebec residents generally is comparable. In viewing expenditures, Quebec has a more clearly articulated plan for providing accessible services to low-income persons and for integrating health and social services, although it has faced some difficulties in seeking to achieve the latter goal. Its plans for decentralized services are counter-balanced by a strong provincial role in health policy decision-making. Quebec's political culture also allows the province to play a stronger role in hospital planning and in the regulation of physician income than one finds in Ontario. These political dynamics allow Quebec an advantage in control of costs. In Ontario, in spite of some recent setbacks, physician interests and hospital sector interests play a more active role in health system bargaining and are usually able to influence remuneration and resource allocation decisions more than physician interests and hospital sector interests in Quebec.
魁北克省和安大略省的医疗保险及医疗服务提供系统是在联邦法规和国家财政补贴的框架内发展起来的,它们普遍提供全面的基本医院和医疗福利,并且越来越多地提供长期护理服务。在合作联邦制的框架下,安大略省和魁北克省的医疗保健系统各自独立发展。从人口统计数据来看,安大略省和魁北克省居民的健康状况总体相当。在支出方面,魁北克省有一个更明确阐述的计划,旨在为低收入人群提供可及的服务,并整合健康和社会服务,尽管该省在努力实现后一个目标时遇到了一些困难。其分散服务的计划因省政府在卫生政策决策中发挥的强大作用而得到平衡。魁北克省的政治文化也使得该省在医院规划和医生收入监管方面比安大略省发挥更强的作用。这些政治动态使魁北克省在成本控制方面具有优势。在安大略省,尽管最近遭遇了一些挫折,但医生利益集团和医院部门利益集团在卫生系统谈判中发挥着更积极的作用,而且通常比魁北克省的医生利益集团和医院部门利益集团更能影响薪酬和资源分配决策。