Suppr超能文献

让医护人员和利益相关者参与医疗模拟建模,以更好地将研究转化为健康影响:一项系统综述。

Engaging Healthcare Staff and Stakeholders in Healthcare Simulation Modeling to Better Translate Research Into Health Impact: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Zabell Thea, Long Katrina M, Scott Debbie, Hope Judy, McLoughlin Ian, Enticott Joanne

机构信息

Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2021 Nov 23;1:644831. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2021.644831. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

To identify processes to engage stakeholders in healthcare Simulation Modeling (SM), and the impacts of this engagement on model design, model implementation, and stakeholder participants. To investigate how engagement process may lead to specific impacts. English-language articles on health SM engaging stakeholders in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Business Source Complete databases published from inception to February 2020. A systematic review of the literature based on a priori protocol and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Eligible articles were SM studies with a health outcome which engaged stakeholders in model design. Data were extracted using a data extraction form adapted to be specific for stakeholder engagement in SM studies. Data were analyzed using summary statistics, deductive and inductive content analysis, and narrative synthesis. Thirty-two articles met inclusion criteria. Processes used to engage stakeholders in healthcare SM are heterogenous and often based on intuition rather than clear methodological frameworks. These processes most commonly involve stakeholders across multiple SM stages discussion/dialogue, interviews, workshops and meetings. Key reported impacts of stakeholder engagement included improved model quality/accuracy, implementation, and stakeholder decision-making. However, for all but four studies, these reports represented author perceptions rather than formal evaluations incorporating stakeholder perspectives. Possible process enablers of impact included the use of models as "boundary objects" and structured facilitation storytelling to promote effective communication and mutual understanding between stakeholders and modelers. There is a large gap in the current literature of formal evaluation of SM stakeholder engagement, and a lack of consensus about the processes required for effective SM stakeholder engagement. The adoption and clear reporting of structured engagement and process evaluation methodologies/frameworks are required to advance the field and produce evidence of impact.

摘要

确定让利益相关者参与医疗保健模拟建模(SM)的流程,以及这种参与对模型设计、模型实施和利益相关者参与者的影响。调查参与流程如何可能导致特定影响。检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science和Business Source Complete数据库中从建库至2020年2月发表的关于让利益相关者参与健康SM的英文文章。基于预先设定的方案对文献进行系统综述,并按照PRISMA指南进行报告。符合条件的文章为具有健康结果且让利益相关者参与模型设计的SM研究。使用专门针对SM研究中利益相关者参与情况的数据提取表来提取数据。使用汇总统计、演绎和归纳内容分析以及叙述性综合分析数据。32篇文章符合纳入标准。让利益相关者参与医疗保健SM所使用的流程多种多样,且通常基于直觉而非清晰的方法框架。这些流程最常见的是让利益相关者参与多个SM阶段——讨论/对话、访谈、研讨会和会议。报告的利益相关者参与的主要影响包括提高模型质量/准确性、实施以及利益相关者决策。然而,除了四项研究外,这些报告均代表作者的看法,而非纳入利益相关者观点的正式评估。可能促成影响的流程因素包括将模型用作“边界对象”以及结构化引导——通过讲故事来促进利益相关者与建模者之间的有效沟通和相互理解。当前关于SM利益相关者参与的正式评估文献存在很大差距,并且对于有效的SM利益相关者参与所需的流程缺乏共识。需要采用并清晰报告结构化参与和流程评估方法/框架,以推动该领域发展并产生影响证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc2/10012644/539da89d9e9e/frhs-01-644831-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验