Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.
Cogn Process. 2023 May;24(2):301-311. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01130-8. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
In online language comprehension, the parser incrementally builds hierarchical syntactic structures. The predictive nature of this structure-building process has been the subject of extensive debate. A previous study observed that when a wh-phrase indicates parallelism between the upcoming wh-clause and a preceding clause (e.g., John told some stories, but we couldn't remember which stories…), the parser predictively constructs the wh-clause. This observation demonstrates predictive structure building. However, the study also suggests that the parser does not make a prediction when the wh-phrase indicates that parallelism does not hold (e.g., John told some stories … with which stories…), a potential limit to the prediction of syntactic structures. Crucially, these findings are controversial because the study did not observe processing difficulty when disambiguating input indicated that the predicted continuation was inconsistent with the globally grammatical structure (garden-path effects). The controversial results may be due to a lack of statistical power. Therefore, the present study conducted a large-scale replication study (324 participants and 24 sets of materials). The results revealed that the parser predicts the clausal structure, irrespective of the type of wh-phrase. There was also evidence of garden-path effects, supporting the finding that the parser makes a prediction. These observations suggest that the prediction algorithm inherent in the human parser is more powerful than assumed by the previous study and that the parser attempts to construct globally grammatical structures during revision.
在在线语言理解中,解析器逐步构建层次化的句法结构。这个结构构建过程的预测性质一直是广泛争论的主题。先前的一项研究观察到,当 wh 短语表示即将到来的 wh 从句与前面的从句之间存在平行关系时(例如,John told some stories, but we couldn't remember which stories…),解析器会预测性地构建 wh 从句。这一观察表明了预测性的结构构建。然而,该研究还表明,当 wh 短语表示平行关系不成立时(例如,John told some stories … with which stories…),解析器不会做出预测,这是对句法结构预测的潜在限制。至关重要的是,这些发现存在争议,因为该研究在对输入进行歧义消解时并没有观察到处理困难,而输入表明预测的延续与全局语法结构不一致(花园路径效应)。有争议的结果可能是由于统计能力不足。因此,本研究进行了一项大规模的复制研究(324 名参与者和 24 组材料)。结果表明,解析器预测了从句结构,而与 wh 短语的类型无关。也有花园路径效应的证据,支持解析器做出预测的发现。这些观察结果表明,人类解析器中固有的预测算法比先前研究假设的更强大,并且解析器在修订过程中试图构建全局语法结构。