• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

20 多年来机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的结果:单外科医生经验。

Outcomes over 20 years performing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-surgeon experience.

机构信息

Urology Division, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06106, USA.

Hartford Hospital Research Program, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, 06106, USA.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2023 Apr;41(4):1047-1053. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04346-7. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-023-04346-7
PMID:36930256
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a single surgeon's 20-year experience with robotic radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy by a single surgeon were identified via an IRB approved prospectively maintained prostate cancer database. Patients were divided into 5-year cohorts (cohort A 2001-2005; cohort B 2006-2010; cohort C 2011-2015; cohort D 2016-2021) for analysis. Oncologic and quality of life outcomes were recorded at the time of follow-up visits. Continence was defined as 0-1 pad with occasional dribbling. Potency was defined as intercourse or an erection sufficient for intercourse within the last 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Three thousand one hundred fifty-two patients met criteria for inclusion. Clavien ≥ 3 complication rates decreased from 5.9% to 3.2%, p = 0.021. There was considerable Gleason grade group (GG) and stage migration to more advanced disease between cohort A (6.4% GG4 or GG5, 16.2% pT3 or pT4, 1.2% N1) and cohort D (17% GG4 or GG5, 45.5% pT3 or pT4, 14.4% N1; p < 0.001). Consistent with this, an increasing proportion of patients required salvage treatments over time (14.6% of cohort A vs 22.5% of cohort D, p < 0.001). 1-year continence rates improved from 74.8% to greater than 92.4%, p < 0.001. While baseline potency and use of intraoperative nerve spare decreased, for patients potent at baseline, there were no significant differences for potency at one year (p = 0.065).

CONCLUSIONS

In this 20-year review of our experience with robotic prostatectomy, complication rates and continence outcomes improved over time, and there was a migration to more advanced disease at the time of surgery.

摘要

目的

评估一位外科医生 20 年的机器人根治性前列腺切除术经验。

方法

通过经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性维护的前列腺癌数据库,确定接受单一外科医生机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的患者。患者被分为 5 年队列(队列 A:2001-2005 年;队列 B:2006-2010 年;队列 C:2011-2015 年;队列 D:2016-2021 年)进行分析。在随访时记录肿瘤学和生活质量结果。控尿定义为 0-1 片尿垫,偶尔有滴漏。勃起功能定义为过去 4 周内进行性交或勃起足以进行性交。

结果

符合纳入标准的患者有 3152 名。Clavien≥3 级并发症发生率从 5.9%降至 3.2%,p=0.021。在 A 队列(6.4% GG4 或 GG5,16.2% pT3 或 pT4,1.2% N1)和 D 队列(17% GG4 或 GG5,45.5% pT3 或 pT4,14.4% N1;p<0.001)之间,格里森分级组(GG)和疾病分期存在明显的迁移,向更晚期疾病发展。与此一致的是,随着时间的推移,需要挽救性治疗的患者比例也在增加(A 队列的 14.6%与 D 队列的 22.5%,p<0.001)。1 年控尿率从 74.8%提高到 92.4%以上,p<0.001。虽然基线勃起功能和术中神经保留的使用减少,但对于基线有勃起功能的患者,1 年时勃起功能无显著差异(p=0.065)。

结论

在这项对我们机器人前列腺切除术经验进行的 20 年回顾中,随着时间的推移,并发症发生率和控尿效果得到改善,而手术时的疾病分期也向更晚期迁移。

相似文献

1
Outcomes over 20 years performing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-surgeon experience.20 多年来机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的结果:单外科医生经验。
World J Urol. 2023 Apr;41(4):1047-1053. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04346-7. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Nerve spare robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with amniotic membranes: medium term outcomes.神经保留机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术联合羊膜:中期结果。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Oct;16(5):1219-1224. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01370-4. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
4
The Surgical Learning Curve for Biochemical Recurrence After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助前列腺根治术后生化复发的手术学习曲线。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Aug;6(4):414-421. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
5
Urinary continence recovery after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in relation to surgeon experience.保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控恢复与术者经验的关系。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2503-2511. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01687-8. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
6
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer.保留 Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:在侵袭性和局部进展性前列腺癌中的功能和早期肿瘤学结果。
BMC Urol. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0550-9.
7
Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.经腹腔与腹膜外机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:一项前瞻性单术者随机对照研究。
Int J Urol. 2015 Oct;22(10):916-21. doi: 10.1111/iju.12854. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
8
Longitudinal analysis of trifecta outcome in Japanese patients with prostate cancer following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.日本机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后前列腺癌患者三结局的纵向分析。
World J Urol. 2022 Aug;40(8):2009-2015. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03515-2. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
9
Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的功能恢复、肿瘤学结果和术后并发症:比较保留耻骨前列腺韧带和标准方法的循证分析。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1210-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.115. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
10
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放式经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照 3 期研究的早期结果。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1057-1066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery: Outcomes from the First Multicentre, Randomised, Patient-blinded Controlled Trial in Radical Prostatectomy (LAP-01).机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术:根治性前列腺切除术(LAP-01)首次多中心、随机、患者盲对照试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):750-759. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.030. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Extended Versus Limited Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: Early Oncological Outcomes from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.根治性前列腺切除术治疗中高危前列腺癌时广泛与局限性盆腔淋巴结清扫术的比较:一项随机 3 期试验的早期肿瘤学结局。
Eur Urol. 2021 May;79(5):595-604. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.040. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
3
Utilization of a Peritoneal Interposition Flap to Prevent Symptomatic Lymphoceles After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy and Bilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.
利用腹膜间置瓣预防机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术后症状性淋巴囊肿。
J Endourol. 2020 Aug;34(8):821-827. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0073. Epub 2020 May 13.
4
Prostate cancer incidence across stage, NCCN risk groups, and age before and after USPSTF Grade D recommendations against prostate-specific antigen screening in 2012.2012 年 USPSTF 发布 D 级前列腺特异性抗原筛查建议后,按阶段、NCCN 风险分组和年龄划分的前列腺癌发病率。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 15;126(4):717-724. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32604. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Decision Regret after Radical Prostatectomy does Not Depend on Surgical Approach: 6-Year Followup of a Large German Cohort Undergoing Routine Care.根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后的决策后悔与手术方式无关:接受常规护理的大型德国队列的 6 年随访结果。
J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):554-561. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000541. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
6
Impact of Urology Resident Involvement on intraoperative, Long-Term Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术中小结直肠外科医师参与对术中、长期肿瘤学和功能结局的影响。
Urology. 2019 Oct;132:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.040. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
7
Adjuvant and Salvage Radiotherapy after Prostatectomy: ASTRO/AUA Guideline Amendment 2018-2019.前列腺切除术术后辅助和挽救性放疗:ASTRO/AUA 指南 2018-2019 年修订版。
J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):533-538. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000295. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
8
Use of Active Surveillance or Watchful Waiting for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Management Trends Across Risk Groups in the United States, 2010-2015.美国 2010-2015 年低危前列腺癌的主动监测或观察等待使用情况和各风险组的管理趋势
JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):704-706. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19941.
9
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照研究的 24 个月结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
10
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part II: Recommended Approaches and Details of Specific Care Options.临床局限性前列腺癌:AUA/ASTRO/SUO 指南。第二部分:推荐方法和特定治疗方案的详细信息。
J Urol. 2018 Apr;199(4):990-997. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 10.