• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证用于评估重症监护后综合征的健康老龄化大脑保健监测器自我报告工具的日文版。

Verifying the Japanese version of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor self-report tool for evaluating post-intensive care syndrome.

机构信息

Neuroscience Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.

Adult Health Nursing, Department of Nursing, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan.

出版信息

Aust Crit Care. 2023 Nov;36(6):989-996. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2023.02.004
PMID:36934045
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) requires the use of multiple assessment tools because it affects multiple domains: Cognitive, Functional, and Behavioural/Psychological. Therefore, this study translated the self-report (SR) version of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor (HABC-M), spanning multiple domains, into Japanese and analysed its reliability and validity in a post-intensive care setting.

METHODS

Patients aged 20 years or older and admitted to the adult intensive care unit from August 2019 to January 2021 were included and surveyed by questionnaire. The 21-item Dementia Assessment Sheet for the Regional Comprehensive Care System was used to validate cognitive and physical aspects, and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition were used to validate emotional aspects. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha, and congruent validity by correlation analysis. Multivariate linear regression models were used to identify potential factors for PICS.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients (mean age: 64 ± 14 years) with 3 median mechanical ventilation days (interquartile range: 2-5) were enrolled. The Cognitive domain of the HABC-M SR was highly correlated with memory and disorientation (r = 0.77 for each), while the Functional domain was highly correlated with Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (r = 0.75-0.79). The Behavioural/Psychological domain highly correlated with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (r = 0.75-0.76). Multivariate analysis revealed longer ICU stays associated with lower Cognitive and Functional (p = 0.03 for each) domains and longer mechanical ventilation days with a lower Behavioural/Psychological domain (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The translated Japanese HABC-M SR showed high validity for assessment of the Cognitive, Functional, and Behavioural/Psychological domains of PICS. Therefore, we recommend that the Japanese version of the HABC-M SR be routinely used in the assessment of PICS.

摘要

背景

创伤后综合征(PICS)需要使用多种评估工具,因为它会影响多个领域:认知、功能和行为/心理。因此,本研究将涵盖多个领域的自我报告(SR)版本的健康老龄化大脑护理监测器(HABC-M)翻译成日语,并在重症监护后环境中分析其可靠性和有效性。

方法

纳入 2019 年 8 月至 2021 年 1 月期间入住成人重症监护病房的年龄在 20 岁及以上的患者,并通过问卷调查进行调查。使用区域综合护理系统的痴呆评估表评估认知和身体方面,使用患者健康问卷-9、广泛性焦虑症-7 和创伤后应激障碍检查表诊断和统计手册第 5 版评估情绪方面。通过 Cronbach's alpha 评估可靠性,通过相关分析评估一致性有效性。使用多元线性回归模型确定 PICS 的潜在因素。

结果

共纳入 104 例患者(平均年龄:64 ± 14 岁),中位机械通气天数为 3 天(四分位距:2-5)。HABC-M SR 的认知域与记忆和定向障碍高度相关(每项 r = 0.77),而功能域与工具性日常生活活动量表高度相关(r = 0.75-0.79)。行为/心理域与患者健康问卷-9、广泛性焦虑症-7 和创伤后应激障碍检查表诊断和统计手册第 5 版高度相关(r = 0.75-0.76)。多变量分析显示,ICU 停留时间较长与认知和功能域较低(每项 p = 0.03)以及机械通气时间较长与行为/心理域较低(p < 0.01)相关。

结论

翻译后的日语 HABC-M SR 对 PICS 的认知、功能和行为/心理领域的评估具有较高的有效性。因此,我们建议在评估 PICS 时常规使用 HABC-M SR 的日语版本。

相似文献

1
Verifying the Japanese version of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor self-report tool for evaluating post-intensive care syndrome.验证用于评估重症监护后综合征的健康老龄化大脑保健监测器自我报告工具的日文版。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Nov;36(6):989-996. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
2
Screening for post-intensive care syndrome: Validation of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self-Report Chinese version.重症监护后综合征的筛查:《健康老龄脑护理监测自评中文版》的验证
Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Jul;29(4):824-829. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12949. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
3
Post-intensive care screening: French translation and validation of the Healthy Aging Brain Care-Monitor, hybrid version.重症监护后筛查:法语翻译和验证健康老龄化大脑护理监测器,混合版。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Apr 2;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01967-1.
4
The Healthy Aging Brain Care (HABC) Monitor: validation of the Patient Self-Report Version of the clinical tool designed to measure and monitor cognitive, functional, and psychological health.健康老龄化大脑关爱(HABC)监测器:用于测量和监测认知、功能和心理健康的临床工具患者自评版的验证。
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Dec 5;9:2123-32. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S64140. eCollection 2014.
5
Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor, Caregiver Version: Screening for Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.健康老龄化大脑关爱监测器,护理版:重症监护后综合征筛查。
Am J Crit Care. 2022 Mar 1;31(2):137-144. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022451.
6
Utility of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor as a Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring Tool in Older Injury Survivors.健康老龄化大脑护理监测器作为老年创伤幸存者患者报告症状监测工具的效用。
J Surg Res. 2023 Oct;290:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.04.010. Epub 2023 May 22.
7
Incidence of and risk factors for post-intensive care syndrome among Chinese respiratory intensive care unit patients: A cross-sectional, prospective study.中国呼吸重症监护病房患者 ICU 后综合征的发生率及危险因素:一项横断面、前瞻性研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Jul;36(4):464-469. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
8
Screening tools for post-intensive care syndrome and post-traumatic symptoms in intensive care unit survivors: A scoping review.重症监护病房幸存者的 ICU 后综合征和创伤后症状筛查工具:范围综述。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Sep;36(5):863-871. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
9
Prevalence of post-intensive care syndrome among Japanese intensive care unit patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational J-PICS study.日本重症监护病房患者 ICU 后综合征的患病率:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性 J-PICS 研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Feb 16;25(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03501-z.
10
Validation into Spanish of a Scale to Detect the Post-intensive Care Syndrome.重症监护后综合征检测量表的西班牙语验证。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2023 Jan;41(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v41n1e09.

引用本文的文献

1
Verifying the Japanese Version of Pediatric Delirium and Withdrawal Syndrome Assessment Scale: SOS-PD Validation Study for Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome.验证小儿谵妄与戒断综合征评估量表的日文版:医源性戒断综合征的SOS-PD验证研究
Children (Basel). 2025 Mar 17;12(3):372. doi: 10.3390/children12030372.
2
Longitudinal Evaluation of the HABC Monitor Among Trauma Survivors.创伤幸存者中HABC监测仪的纵向评估
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Mar 4;20:245-258. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S492210. eCollection 2025.