• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持以患者为中心的青少年和青年成人避孕护理干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价

Effectiveness of interventions to support person-centered contraceptive care for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review.

作者信息

Allison Bianca A, Glodowski Cherise R, Smith Cambray, Mizelle Celia, Leiva Hailey, Wright Sarah Towner, Golin Carol, Arora Kavita Shah, Schilling Samantha

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.

University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Aug;233(2):82-100.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.03.016. Epub 2025 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.03.016
PMID:40120733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12303768/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between interventions to support adolescent and young adult person-centered contraceptive counseling and the delivery of person-centered contraceptive counseling, and their impact on clinician and patient outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature via EBSCO, Embase.com, PsycInfo via EBSCO, and Scopus searched on March 31, 2024.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Published from March 2011 to present, included patients assigned female at birth and <25 years, studied interventions that operationalized aspects of person-centered contraceptive counseling, and had patient or clinician outcomes related to person-centered contraceptive counseling (eg, direct measurement of person-centered contraceptive counseling, knowledge, confidence, and contraceptive decision-making). All study designs with primary data collection were included except case studies/series.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Search results were downloaded to EndNote, and duplicates were removed. References were uploaded to Covidence Systematic Review software. Two authors independently screened the studies using the eligibility criteria by title and abstract then full-text review. Relevant information was extracted independently by 2 authors. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus discussion. Data included study sample demographic characteristics, methodological characteristics, intervention and comparator descriptions, and outcome measures. We then determined risk of bias for individual studies and strength of evidence by included outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 5611 unique titles and abstracts, 12 studies met eligibility criteria. Four were pre/post studies, 2 were randomized controlled trials, and 6 were observational. These studies evaluated interventions including contraceptive coaching, decision aids, and clinician counseling prompts. No studies directly assessed person-centered contraceptive counseling using validated measures. All studies reported improvements in contraception-related secondary patient and clinician outcomes in the short and medium term. Patient outcomes included the following: continuation, choice, knowledge, perceived benefits, quality of care, and self-efficacy. Clinician outcomes included the following: comfort, knowledge, quality of care, and perceived benefits. Most studies had a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

While interventions to support person-centered contraceptive counseling may improve patient and clinician outcomes, none of the studies directly measured person-centered contraceptive counseling or assessed preferred method use or reproductive autonomy as outcomes. The results were integrated into a Socioecological Model of Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling and Care to diagram relationships between interventions, delivery of person-centered contraceptive counseling, and secondary outcomes.

摘要

目的

探讨支持以青少年和青年人为中心的避孕咨询干预措施与以青少年和青年人为中心的避孕咨询服务提供之间的关联,以及它们对临床医生和患者结局的影响。

数据来源

2024年3月31日检索了PubMed、通过EBSCO的护理及相关健康文献累积索引、Embase.com、通过EBSCO的PsycInfo以及Scopus。

研究纳入标准

发表于2011年3月至目前,纳入出生时被指定为女性且年龄<25岁的患者,研究对以青少年和青年人为中心的避孕咨询各方面进行操作化的干预措施,且有与以青少年和青年人为中心的避孕咨询相关的患者或临床医生结局(如直接测量以青少年和青年人为中心的避孕咨询、知识、信心和避孕决策)。除病例研究/系列外,所有具有原始数据收集的研究设计均纳入。

研究评估与综合方法

检索结果下载至EndNote,去除重复项。参考文献上传至Covidence系统评价软件。两位作者独立使用纳入标准通过标题和摘要筛选研究,然后进行全文审查。两位作者独立提取相关信息。通过共识讨论解决分歧。数据包括研究样本的人口统计学特征、方法学特征、干预和对照描述以及结局指标。然后我们确定了各个研究的偏倚风险以及纳入结局的证据强度。

结果

在5611个独特的标题和摘要中,12项研究符合纳入标准。4项为前后对照研究,2项为随机对照试验,6项为观察性研究。这些研究评估了包括避孕指导、决策辅助工具和临床医生咨询提示等干预措施。没有研究使用经过验证的测量方法直接评估以青少年和青年人为中心的避孕咨询。所有研究均报告在短期和中期,与避孕相关的次要患者和临床医生结局有所改善。患者结局包括:持续使用、选择、知识、感知益处、护理质量和自我效能感。临床医生结局包括:舒适度、知识、护理质量和感知益处。大多数研究存在较高的偏倚风险。

结论

虽然支持以青少年和青年人为中心的避孕咨询的干预措施可能会改善患者和临床医生结局,但没有研究直接测量以青少年和青年人为中心的避孕咨询,也没有将首选方法的使用或生殖自主权作为结局进行评估。研究结果被整合到一个以青少年和青年人为中心的避孕咨询与护理的社会生态模型中,以描绘干预措施、以青少年和青年人为中心的避孕咨询服务提供与次要结局之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of interventions to support person-centered contraceptive care for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review.支持以患者为中心的青少年和青年成人避孕护理干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Aug;233(2):82-100.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.03.016. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth.产后妇女避孕方法的教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15(8):CD001863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001863.pub3.
4
Strategies for improving postpartum contraceptive use: evidence from non-randomized studies.改善产后避孕措施使用情况的策略:来自非随机研究的证据
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 27;2014(11):CD011298. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011298.pub2.
5
Education for contraceptive use by women after childbirth.产后妇女避孕方法教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 29;2015(7):CD001863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001863.pub4.
6
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
7
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
8
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV.改善感染艾滋病毒妇女避孕措施使用情况的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD010243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010243.pub2.
9
Behavioral interventions for improving contraceptive use among women living with HIV.改善感染艾滋病毒女性避孕措施使用情况的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 9;2016(8):CD010243. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010243.pub3.
10
Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people.提高年轻人避孕措施使用率的简短教育策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 30;3(3):CD012025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012025.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for the Need and Desire for Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: A Systematic Review.
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Dec;67(6S):S10-S21. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
2
Providing Quality Family Planning Services in the United States: Recommendations of the U.S. Office of Population Affairs (Revised 2024).在美国提供优质计划生育服务:美国人口事务办公室的建议(2024年修订)
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Dec;67(6S):S41-S86. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Exploring primary care physician biases in adolescent contraceptive counseling.探索初级保健医生在青少年避孕咨询中的偏见。
Contraception. 2025 Jan;141:110706. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110706. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
4
The role (and limits) of developmental neuroscience in determining adolescents' autonomy rights: The case for reproductive and voting rights.发展神经科学在确定青少年自主权方面的作用(和限制):生殖和投票权的案例。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Oct;69:101435. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101435. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
5
Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study.探索面向青少年的美国临床医生对其避孕咨询及共同决策使用情况的看法:一项定性研究。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Dec;56(4):337-346. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12283. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
6
Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: a population-based study.美国首选避孕方法的使用情况估计:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Jan 19;30:100662. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100662. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Prioritizing patient experience: Validation of the person-centered contraceptive counseling measure as a performance measure.优先考虑患者体验:将以患者为中心的避孕咨询措施作为绩效衡量标准的验证。
Contraception. 2023 Jul;123:110010. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110010. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
8
Feasibility of a Contraception Intervention for Hospitalized Adolescents and Young Adults.住院青少年和年轻成年人避孕干预措施的可行性。
Hosp Pediatr. 2023 Apr 1;13(4):337-344. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006996.
9
Provider perspectives on patient-centered contraceptive counseling for Latinas in Baltimore, MD.马里兰州巴尔的摩市提供者对拉丁裔妇女以患者为中心的避孕咨询的看法。
Contraception. 2023 Mar;119:109921. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.109921. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
10
Reproductive Well-Being: A Framework for Expanding Contraceptive Access.生殖健康:扩大避孕措施可及性的框架
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S5):S504-S507. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306898.