• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性和女性中,使用体外循环进行冠状动脉旁路移植术时采用多种动脉移植物的结果。

Outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting with multiple arterial grafting by pump status in men and women.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 May;167(5):1796-1807.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.02.008
PMID:36935299
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple arterial grafting (MAG) and off-pump surgery are strategies proposed to improve outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study was conducted to determine the impact of off-pump surgery on outcomes after CABG with MAG in men and women.

METHODS

This cohort study used population-based data to identify all Ontarians undergoing isolated CABG with MAG between October 2008 and September 2019. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; hospitalization for stroke, myocardial infarction hospitalization or heart failure, or repeat revascularization). Analysis used propensity-score overlap-weighted cause-specific Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

A total of 2989 women (1188 off-pump, 1801 on-pump) and 16,209 men (6065 off-pump, 10,144 on-pump) underwent MAG with a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range, 2.7-8.0) years. Compared to the on-pump approach, all-cause mortality was not changed with off-pump status (hazard ratio [HR] in women: 1.25 [95% CI, 0.83-1.88]; in men: 1.08 [95% CI, 0.85-1.37]). In women, the risk of MACCE was significantly higher off-pump (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.04-2.03), with nonsignificantly increased risk observed for all component outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing CABG with MAG, this population-based analysis found no association between pump status and survival in either men or women. However, it did suggest that off-pump MAG in women may be associated with an increased risk of MACCE.

摘要

背景

多动脉搭桥术(MAG)和非体外循环手术是被提出用于改善冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)结果的策略。本研究旨在确定非体外循环手术对 MAG 下 CABG 男性和女性患者结局的影响。

方法

本队列研究使用基于人群的数据,确定 2008 年 10 月至 2019 年 9 月期间所有接受 MAG 下孤立性 CABG 的安大略省居民。主要结局为全因死亡率。次要结局包括主要心脏和脑血管不良事件(MACCE;中风住院、心肌梗死住院或心力衰竭住院或再次血运重建)。分析采用倾向评分重叠加权特定原因 Cox 比例风险回归。

结果

共纳入 2989 名女性(1188 名非体外循环,1801 名体外循环)和 16209 名男性(6065 名非体外循环,10144 名体外循环),中位随访时间为 5.0 年(四分位距,2.7-8.0)。与体外循环方法相比,非体外循环状态下全因死亡率没有变化(女性:1.25[95%CI,0.83-1.88];男性:1.08[95%CI,0.85-1.37])。在女性中,非体外循环的 MACCE 风险显著更高(HR,1.45;95%CI,1.04-2.03),所有组成部分结局的风险也有增加但无统计学意义。

结论

在接受 MAG 下 CABG 的患者中,这项基于人群的分析在男性和女性中均未发现泵状态与生存之间存在关联。然而,它确实表明女性的非体外循环 MAG 可能与 MACCE 风险增加相关。

相似文献

1
Outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting with multiple arterial grafting by pump status in men and women.男性和女性中,使用体外循环进行冠状动脉旁路移植术时采用多种动脉移植物的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 May;167(5):1796-1807.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
Multiple Arterial Grafting Is Associated With Better Outcomes for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients.多支动脉搭桥术与冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的更好结局相关。
Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138(19):2081-2090. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034464.
3
Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Population-Based Study of Patients in British Columbia, Canada.多支冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结果:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省患者的基于人群研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1187-1196. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3705.
4
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
5
Multiple arterial coronary bypass grafting is associated with greater survival in women.多支动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术与女性生存率的提高相关。
Heart. 2021 Jun;107(11):888-894. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317737. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
6
Early and mid-term outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三支血管病变的早期和中期结果:一项随机对照试验。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Apr 13;18(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02258-6.
7
Long-Term Outcomes After Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting by Experienced Surgeons.经验丰富的外科医生施行非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期疗效。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Sep 25;72(13):1478-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.029.
8
Current Status of Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Multiple Coronary Artery Disease Compared with On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The Korean National Cohort Study.多支冠状动脉疾病患者非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的现状比较:韩国全国队列研究
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;66(6):470-476. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1651516. Epub 2018 May 31.
9
Sex differences after coronary artery bypass grafting with a second arterial conduit.冠状动脉旁路移植术后使用第二种动脉移植物的性别差异。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Feb;163(2):686-695.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.058. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
10
Five-Year Outcome After Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗老年患者的 5 年结果。
Circulation. 2019 Apr 16;139(16):1865-1871. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035857.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors and prediction model for acute ischemic stroke after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting based on Bayesian network.基于贝叶斯网络的非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后急性缺血性脑卒中的危险因素及预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02762-2.