Suppr超能文献

使用饮食障碍检查问卷的临床截断分数来评估自然强化治疗期间和之后的饮食障碍症状。

Using clinical cutoff scores on the eating disorder examination-questionnaire to evaluate eating disorder symptoms during and after naturalistic intensive treatment.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Eat Disord. 2023 Sep 3;31(5):464-478. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2023.2191488. Epub 2023 Mar 19.

Abstract

Clinical cutoff scores for self-report measures provide a means of evaluating clinically significant pathology during and after treatment. A cutoff of 2.8 on the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) has been recommended to screen for eating disorders (ED). We used this cutoff to assess ED symptoms in adolescents ( = 444) and adults ( = 592) through ED treatment and follow-up. Most patients scored above 2.8 at intake (adolescents 67%,  = 3.21; adults 78%,  = 4.20) and below 2.8 at discharge (adolescents 65%,  = 1.87; adults 66%,  = 2.67), with gains often maintained through follow-up (40% of adolescents and 35% of adults at 12-month follow-up). EDE-Q scores were higher in adults than adolescents and in patients with binge/purge disorders. Results suggest a cutoff of 2.8 on the EDE-Q effectively tracks ED symptom improvement through treatment and discharge. This supports the need for the development of culture-specific and empirically developed clinical cutoffs and their widespread use to evaluate program effectiveness.

摘要

临床截断分数为自评量表提供了一种在治疗中和治疗后评估临床显著病理的方法。建议使用饮食障碍检查问卷(EDE-Q)的截断值 2.8 来筛查饮食障碍(ED)。我们使用这个截断值来评估通过 ED 治疗和随访的青少年(n=444)和成年人(n=592)的 ED 症状。大多数患者在入组时的得分高于 2.8(青少年 67%,均数=3.21;成年人 78%,均数=4.20),在出院时的得分低于 2.8(青少年 65%,均数=1.87;成年人 66%,均数=2.67),随访时往往保持好转(青少年有 40%和成年人有 35%在 12 个月随访时)。EDE-Q 评分在成年人中高于青少年,在暴食/清除障碍患者中也更高。结果表明,EDE-Q 的 2.8 截断值有效地跟踪了 ED 症状在治疗和出院期间的改善。这支持需要制定特定文化和基于经验的临床截断值,并广泛使用这些截断值来评估项目效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验