• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现实世界中的恐惧对医学院校学生风险决策的影响:一项准实验研究。

Effect of real-world fear on risky decision-making in medical school-based students: A quasi-experimental study.

作者信息

Wang Lei, Chen Sheng, Xiao Wei

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing, China.

Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, Xian, China.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Mar 2;17:1030098. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1030098. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1030098
PMID:36935894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10017853/
Abstract

To explore the effect of real-world fear on risky decision-making under certainty and uncertainty. This quasi-experimental study enrolled non-psychology undergraduate volunteers aged between 17 and 20 years old from the Preventive Medical Institute medical school in Xi'an. Participants were randomly divided into two groups, and each group received a two-stage crossover design intervention (of a calm and fearful situation) and completed the tasks of risky decision-making under uncertainty (the balloon analog risk task: BART) and certainty (the Cambridge gambling task: CGT), respectively. The primary outcomes included the behavioral impulsivity measured by the BART value, and the speed of decision-making, the quality of decisions, the adventure index, behavioral impulsivity, and risk adjustment measured by CGT. The secondary outcome was the concentration of cortisol in the saliva. A total of 60 questionnaires and data were obtained from 60 participants (28 males and 32 females, aged 19.55 ± 0.75). Compared with the calm situation, participants were more likely to have a lower BART value ( = 0.013), slower speed of decision-making ( < 0.05), and higher adventure index ( = 0.018) in the fearful situation. The quality of decisions ( = 0.189), behavioral impulsivity index ( = 0.182), and risk adjustment ( = 0.063) between subjects in the fearful and calm situations were comparable. Furthermore, the mean value of the adventure index of CGT in male subjects was significantly higher than that in female subjects ( < 0.05), and the cortisol concentration in saliva during the fearful situation was significantly higher compared to the calm situation ( < 0.05). Fear might reduce behavioral impulsivity under uncertainty, and increase the adventure index under certainty in risky decision-making. Risky behavior might be influenced by gender: under certainty in risky decision-making, men were more adventurous. Additionally, fear increased the secretion of cortisol in saliva.

摘要

为探究现实世界中的恐惧对确定性和不确定性下风险决策的影响。本准实验研究招募了来自西安预防医学院的17至20岁非心理学专业本科志愿者。参与者被随机分为两组,每组接受两阶段交叉设计干预(平静和恐惧情境),并分别完成不确定性下的风险决策任务(气球模拟风险任务:BART)和确定性下的风险决策任务(剑桥赌博任务:CGT)。主要结局包括用BART值衡量的行为冲动性,以及用CGT衡量的决策速度、决策质量、冒险指数、行为冲动性和风险调整。次要结局是唾液中皮质醇的浓度。共获得60名参与者(28名男性和32名女性,年龄19.55±0.75岁)的60份问卷和数据。与平静情境相比,参与者在恐惧情境中更有可能具有较低的BART值(P = 0.013)、较慢的决策速度(P < 0.05)和较高的冒险指数(P = 0.018)。恐惧和平静情境下受试者的决策质量(P = 0.189)、行为冲动性指数(P = 0.182)和风险调整(P = 0.063)相当。此外,男性受试者中CGT冒险指数的平均值显著高于女性受试者(P < 0.05),且恐惧情境下唾液中的皮质醇浓度显著高于平静情境(P < 0.05)。恐惧可能会降低不确定性下的行为冲动性,并增加风险决策中确定性下的冒险指数。风险行为可能受性别影响:在风险决策的确定性情境下,男性更具冒险性。此外,恐惧会增加唾液中皮质醇的分泌。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b3/10017853/771f6b446e1a/fnbeh-17-1030098-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b3/10017853/ead0f32b11fb/fnbeh-17-1030098-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b3/10017853/771f6b446e1a/fnbeh-17-1030098-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b3/10017853/ead0f32b11fb/fnbeh-17-1030098-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b3/10017853/771f6b446e1a/fnbeh-17-1030098-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of real-world fear on risky decision-making in medical school-based students: A quasi-experimental study.现实世界中的恐惧对医学院校学生风险决策的影响:一项准实验研究。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Mar 2;17:1030098. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1030098. eCollection 2023.
2
Gunslingers, poker players, and chickens 2: Decision-making under physical performance pressure in subelite athletes.枪手、扑克玩家与斗鸡2:次精英运动员在身体表现压力下的决策制定
Prog Brain Res. 2017;234:317-338. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
3
Examining impulsivity and risky decision making among school youth in balloon analogue risk task.通过气球模拟风险任务研究在校青少年的冲动性和冒险决策。
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Jan;11(1):127-137. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-594.
4
Gunslingers, poker players, and chickens 3: Decision making under mental performance pressure in junior elite athletes.神枪手、扑克玩家与斗鸡3:青少年精英运动员在心理表现压力下的决策制定
Prog Brain Res. 2017;234:339-359. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
5
Effects of acute pain and pain-related fear on risky decision-making and effort during cognitive tests.急性疼痛和与疼痛相关的恐惧对认知测试中风险决策和努力的影响。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2019 Dec;41(10):1033-1047. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1646711. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Relationship between virtual reality balloon analogue risk task and risky decision-making.虚拟现实气球模拟风险任务与冒险决策之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0282097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282097. eCollection 2023.
7
Gunslingers, poker players, and chickens 1: Decision making under physical performance pressure in elite athletes.神枪手、扑克玩家与斗鸡1:精英运动员在身体表现压力下的决策制定
Prog Brain Res. 2017;234:291-316. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
8
Differences in neural activation as a function of risk-taking task parameters.作为风险决策任务参数的函数的神经激活的差异。
Front Neurosci. 2013 Sep 30;7:173. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00173. eCollection 2013.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
The assessment of risky decision making: a factor analysis of performance on the Iowa Gambling Task, Balloon Analogue Risk Task, and Columbia Card Task.风险决策评估:对爱荷华赌博任务、气球模拟风险任务和哥伦比亚卡片任务表现的因素分析。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):777-85. doi: 10.1037/a0038622. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
The continuous and changing impact of affect on risky decision-making.情感对风险决策的持续和变化的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 23;12(1):10613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14810-w.
2
Accumulation of continuously time-varying sensory evidence constrains neural and behavioral responses in human collision threat detection.连续时变感觉证据的积累约束了人类碰撞威胁检测中的神经和行为反应。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jul 15;17(7):e1009096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009096. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
Cooperation across multiple game theoretical paradigms is increased by fear more than anger in selfish individuals.
在自私的个体中,恐惧比愤怒更能增加多个博弈论范式之间的合作。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 30;11(1):9351. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88663-0.
4
Sex difference in the weighting of expected uncertainty under chronic stress.慢性应激下预期不确定性的权重存在性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 22;11(1):8700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88155-1.
5
Virtual reality video promotes effectiveness in advance care planning.虚拟现实视频提高了预先护理计划的效果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Aug 16;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00634-w.
6
Does Divergence in Habitat Breadth Associate with Species Differences in Decision Making in and ?栖息地广度的差异是否与[具体情境]中决策的物种差异相关?
Genes (Basel). 2020 May 9;11(5):528. doi: 10.3390/genes11050528.
7
Punishment insensitivity emerges from impaired contingency detection, not aversion insensitivity or reward dominance.惩罚不敏感源于对关联检测能力的损伤,而非厌恶不敏感或奖赏优势。
Elife. 2019 Nov 26;8:e52765. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52765.
8
Human online adaptation to changes in prior probability.人类对先验概率变化的在线适应。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jul 8;15(7):e1006681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006681. eCollection 2019 Jul.
9
A marker of biological ageing predicts adult risk preference in European starlings, .生物衰老的一个标志物可预测欧洲椋鸟的成年风险偏好。
Behav Ecol. 2018 May-Jun;29(3):589-597. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ary009. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
10
Impulsivity influences betting under stress in laboratory gambling.冲动性会影响实验室赌博中的应激下注。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 6;7(1):10668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10745-9.