Suppr超能文献

冲动性会影响实验室赌博中的应激下注。

Impulsivity influences betting under stress in laboratory gambling.

机构信息

Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 6;7(1):10668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10745-9.

Abstract

Although recent research suggests that acute stress influences subsequent decision-making under ambiguity, less is known about the role of personality variables in this relationship. This study tested whether impulsivity traits and acute stress differentially influence the way in which a prior feedback is incorporated into further decisions involving ambiguity. Sixty college students (50% male; aged 18-25 years) were randomly assigned to a stress versus a non-stress condition before completing a laboratory gambling task. The results revealed that independently of the stress condition, subjects behaved as if the odds of winning increase after a single loss. Additionally, stress effects varied as a function of impulsivity traits. Individuals who lacked perseverance (i.e., had difficulty focusing on a difficult or boring task) gambled more after experiencing a loss in the stress condition than did those in the control condition. The present study supports that impulsivity traits can explain the differential effect of stress on the relationship between prior feedback and choices made under ambiguity.

摘要

尽管最近的研究表明急性应激会影响随后在模糊情境下的决策,但关于人格变量在这种关系中的作用知之甚少。本研究测试了冲动特质和急性应激是否会以不同的方式影响先前的反馈在进一步涉及模糊情境的决策中的整合方式。60 名大学生(50%为男性;年龄 18-25 岁)在完成实验室赌博任务之前,被随机分配到应激条件组或非应激条件组。结果表明,无论应激条件如何,被试的行为表现都好像在单次损失后获胜的几率增加了。此外,应激效应还取决于冲动特质。缺乏毅力(即,难以专注于困难或枯燥的任务)的个体在应激条件下经历损失后比在对照条件下的个体更愿意冒险。本研究支持冲动特质可以解释应激对先前反馈和模糊情境下选择之间关系的差异影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f95/5587697/641c163bd050/41598_2017_10745_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验