• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在自私的个体中,恐惧比愤怒更能增加多个博弈论范式之间的合作。

Cooperation across multiple game theoretical paradigms is increased by fear more than anger in selfish individuals.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 30;11(1):9351. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88663-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-88663-0
PMID:33931689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8087760/
Abstract

Cooperative decisions are well predicted by stable individual differences in social values but it remains unclear how they may be modulated by emotions such as fear and anger. Moving beyond specific decision paradigms, we used a suite of economic games and investigated how experimental inductions of fear or anger affect latent factors of decision making in individuals with selfish or prosocial value orientations. We found that, relative to experimentally induced anger, induced fear elicited higher scores on a cooperation factor, and that this effect was entirely driven by selfish participants. In fact, induced fear brought selfish individuals to cooperate similarly to prosocial individuals, possibly as a (selfish) mean to seek protection in others. These results suggest that two basic threat-related emotions, fear and anger, differentially affect a generalized form of cooperation and that this effect is buffered by prosocial value orientation.

摘要

合作决策可以通过个体在社会价值方面稳定的差异很好地预测,但情绪(如恐惧和愤怒)如何影响合作决策尚不清楚。本研究超越了特定的决策范式,使用了一系列经济博弈游戏,调查了在具有利己或亲社会价值取向的个体中,实验诱导的恐惧或愤怒如何影响决策的潜在因素。研究发现,与实验诱导的愤怒相比,实验诱导的恐惧在合作因素上得分更高,并且这种效应完全是由自私的参与者驱动的。事实上,实验诱导的恐惧使自私的个体合作程度与亲社会的个体相似,这可能是(自私的)寻求他人保护的一种手段。这些结果表明,两种基本的与威胁相关的情绪,恐惧和愤怒,对合作的一般形式有不同的影响,而这种影响被亲社会的价值取向所缓冲。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85c/8087760/f7855bf21557/41598_2021_88663_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85c/8087760/c1a681c96c52/41598_2021_88663_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85c/8087760/3cf2b8f3bd97/41598_2021_88663_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85c/8087760/873902ebafff/41598_2021_88663_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85c/8087760/f7855bf21557/41598_2021_88663_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85c/8087760/c1a681c96c52/41598_2021_88663_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85c/8087760/3cf2b8f3bd97/41598_2021_88663_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85c/8087760/873902ebafff/41598_2021_88663_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85c/8087760/f7855bf21557/41598_2021_88663_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cooperation across multiple game theoretical paradigms is increased by fear more than anger in selfish individuals.在自私的个体中,恐惧比愤怒更能增加多个博弈论范式之间的合作。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 30;11(1):9351. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88663-0.
2
Guilty repair sustains cooperation, angry retaliation destroys it.内疚的修复维持合作,愤怒的报复破坏它。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 27;7:46709. doi: 10.1038/srep46709.
3
Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals.经济博弈中的反应时间反映了亲社会个体和自利个体在不同类型决策冲突中的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 13;114(24):6394-6399. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608877114. Epub 2017 May 30.
4
Resistance to extreme strategies, rather than prosocial preferences, can explain human cooperation in public goods games.对极端策略的抗拒,而非亲社会偏好,能够解释公共物品博弈中的人类合作行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 1;107(22):10125-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000829107. Epub 2010 May 17.
5
The spiral of distrust: (Non-)cooperation in a repeated trust game is predicted by anger and individual differences in negative reciprocity orientation.不信任的螺旋:重复信任博弈中的(非)合作可通过愤怒和负面互惠取向的个体差异来预测。
Int J Psychol. 2017 Dec;52 Suppl 1:18-25. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12257. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
6
Spontaneous cooperation for prosocials, but not for proselfs: Social value orientation moderates spontaneous cooperation behavior.亲社会者的自发合作行为存在,但利己者不存在:社会价值取向调节自发合作行为。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 15;6:21555. doi: 10.1038/srep21555.
7
Moving the self and others to do good: The emotional underpinnings of prosocial behavior.调动自我和他人行善:亲社会行为的情感基础。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.029. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
8
The Neural Basis of Fear Promotes Anger and Sadness Counteracts Anger.恐惧的神经基础促进愤怒,悲伤则对抗愤怒。
Neural Plast. 2018 Jun 14;2018:3479059. doi: 10.1155/2018/3479059. eCollection 2018.
9
Constraints for emotion specificity in fear and anger: the context counts.恐惧和愤怒中情绪特异性的限制因素:情境很重要。
Psychophysiology. 2001 Mar;38(2):275-91.
10
Friend versus foe: Neural correlates of prosocial decisions for liked and disliked peers.朋友与敌人:对喜欢和不喜欢的同伴做出亲社会决策的神经关联
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Feb;18(1):127-142. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0557-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of real-world fear on risky decision-making in medical school-based students: A quasi-experimental study.现实世界中的恐惧对医学院校学生风险决策的影响:一项准实验研究。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Mar 2;17:1030098. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1030098. eCollection 2023.
2
Navigating Motivation: A Semantic and Subjective Atlas of 7 Motives.《动机导航:七种动机的语义与主观图谱》
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 27;11:568064. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568064. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Navigating Motivation: A Semantic and Subjective Atlas of 7 Motives.《动机导航:七种动机的语义与主观图谱》
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 27;11:568064. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568064. eCollection 2020.
2
Mathematical foundations of moral preferences.道德偏好的数学基础。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Feb;18(175):20200880. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0880. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Caring Cooperators and Powerful Punishers: Differential Effects of Induced Care and Power Motivation on Different Types of Economic Decision Making.关爱合作者与强有力的惩罚者:诱导关怀和权力动机对不同类型经济决策的差异化影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 11;7(1):11068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11580-8.
4
Fear, Anger, and Risk Preference Reversals: An Experimental Study on a Chinese Sample.恐惧、愤怒与风险偏好逆转:基于中国样本的实验研究
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 21;8:1371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01371. eCollection 2017.
5
Acute psychosocial stress and everyday moral decision-making in young healthy men: The impact of cortisol.年轻健康男性的急性社会心理应激与日常道德决策:皮质醇的影响。
Horm Behav. 2017 Jul;93:72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 19.
6
Increased neural responses to empathy for pain might explain how acute stress increases prosociality.对疼痛共情的神经反应增强可能解释了急性应激如何增加亲社会行为。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Mar 1;12(3):401-408. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw146.
7
Moderating Effects of Social Value Orientation on the Effect of Social Influence in Prosocial Decisions.社会价值取向对亲社会决策中社会影响效果的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 21;7:952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00952. eCollection 2016.
8
Negative incidental emotions augment fairness sensitivity.负面的偶然情绪会增强公平敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 22;6:24892. doi: 10.1038/srep24892.
9
Incidental fear cues increase monetary loss aversion.偶然出现的恐惧线索会增加对金钱损失的厌恶。
Emotion. 2016 Apr;16(3):402-12. doi: 10.1037/emo0000124. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
10
Stress influences environmental donation behavior in men.压力会影响男性的环境捐赠行为。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Jan;63:311-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.017. Epub 2015 Oct 26.