• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面临压力:勒索软件和屏幕故障对自动驾驶汽车模拟中信任度和驾驶性能的影响

Under pressure: Effect of a ransomware and a screen failure on trust and driving performance in an automated car simulation.

作者信息

Payre William, Perelló-March Jaume, Birrell Stewart

机构信息

National Transport Design Centre, Centre for Future Transport and Cities, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 1;14:1078723. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078723. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078723
PMID:36935947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10014733/
Abstract

One major challenge for automated cars is to not only be safe, but also secure. Indeed, connected vehicles are vulnerable to cyberattacks, which may jeopardize individuals' trust in these vehicles and their safety. In a driving simulator experiment, 38 participants were exposed to two screen failures: (i.e., no turn signals on the in-vehicle screen and instrument cluster) and (i.e., ransomware attack), both while performing a non-driving related task (NDRT) in a conditionally automated vehicle. Results showed that objective trust decreased after experiencing the failures. Drivers took over control of the vehicle and stopped their NDRT more often after the explicit failure than after the silent failure. Lateral control of the vehicle was compromised when taking over control after both failures compared to automated driving performance. However, longitudinal control proved to be smoother in terms of speed homogeneity compared to automated driving performance. These findings suggest that connectivity failures negatively affect trust in automation and manual driving performance after taking over control. This research posits the question of the importance of connectivity in the realm of trust in automation. Finally, we argue that engagement in a NDRT while riding in automated mode is an indicator of trust in the system and could be used as a surrogate measure for trust.

摘要

自动驾驶汽车面临的一个主要挑战不仅是要安全,还要可靠。事实上,联网车辆容易受到网络攻击,这可能会危及个人对这些车辆的信任及其安全性。在一项驾驶模拟器实验中,38名参与者遭遇了两种屏幕故障:(即车内屏幕和仪表盘上没有转向灯信号)以及(即勒索软件攻击),这两种情况都是在一辆有条件自动驾驶的车辆中,参与者执行非驾驶相关任务(NDRT)时发生的。结果表明,经历故障后客观信任度下降。与隐性故障相比,在明确故障后,驾驶员更频繁地接管车辆控制权并停止其NDRT。与自动驾驶性能相比,在两种故障后接管控制权时,车辆的横向控制受到了影响。然而,与自动驾驶性能相比,在速度均匀性方面,纵向控制被证明更加平稳。这些发现表明,连接故障会对接管控制权后的自动化信任和手动驾驶性能产生负面影响。这项研究提出了连接性在自动化信任领域中的重要性问题。最后,我们认为在自动模式下乘车时参与NDRT是对系统信任的一个指标,可以用作信任的替代度量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/aa344c49e43e/fpsyg-14-1078723-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/8428438abffa/fpsyg-14-1078723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/6b0e0471d736/fpsyg-14-1078723-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/b165cd059411/fpsyg-14-1078723-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/7a82d924d49c/fpsyg-14-1078723-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/ee2798bf022f/fpsyg-14-1078723-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/1d60c7d2d1d6/fpsyg-14-1078723-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/71b30e2ace07/fpsyg-14-1078723-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/a5ea52a70b24/fpsyg-14-1078723-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/dbf31292b099/fpsyg-14-1078723-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/aa344c49e43e/fpsyg-14-1078723-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/8428438abffa/fpsyg-14-1078723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/6b0e0471d736/fpsyg-14-1078723-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/b165cd059411/fpsyg-14-1078723-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/7a82d924d49c/fpsyg-14-1078723-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/ee2798bf022f/fpsyg-14-1078723-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/1d60c7d2d1d6/fpsyg-14-1078723-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/71b30e2ace07/fpsyg-14-1078723-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/a5ea52a70b24/fpsyg-14-1078723-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/dbf31292b099/fpsyg-14-1078723-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223f/10014733/aa344c49e43e/fpsyg-14-1078723-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Under pressure: Effect of a ransomware and a screen failure on trust and driving performance in an automated car simulation.面临压力:勒索软件和屏幕故障对自动驾驶汽车模拟中信任度和驾驶性能的影响
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 1;14:1078723. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078723. eCollection 2023.
2
From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.从部分自动化到高度自动化再到手动驾驶:非驾驶相关任务、困意与接管性能之间的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Dec;121:28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
3
Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.引言很重要:操纵对自动化的信任和对自动驾驶的依赖。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jan;66:18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
4
Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.感知到的安全和对 SAE 级别 2 部分自动化汽车的信任:来自在线问卷的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0260953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260953. eCollection 2021.
5
Effects of In-Vehicle Touchscreen Location on Driver Task Performance, Eye Gaze Behavior, and Workload During Conditionally Automated Driving: Nondriving-Related Task and Take-Over.车内触摸屏位置对条件自动化驾驶中驾驶员任务绩效、眼动行为和工作负荷的影响:非驾驶相关任务和接管。
Hum Factors. 2024 Dec;66(12):2651-2668. doi: 10.1177/00187208241226838. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
6
Driver distraction and its effects on partially automated driving performance: A driving simulator study among young-experienced drivers.驾驶员分心及其对部分自动化驾驶性能的影响:一项针对年轻经验丰富驾驶员的驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Mar;166:106565. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106565. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
7
Evaluation of Imminent Take-Over Requests With Real Automation on a Test Track.在测试轨道上使用实际自动化对即将到来的接管请求进行评估。
Hum Factors. 2023 Dec;65(8):1776-1792. doi: 10.1177/00187208211051435. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
8
Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.驾驶相关任务对自动驾驶接管性能影响的年龄相关差异。
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.019. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.密切关注:在高度自动驾驶过程中,注视行为作为衡量自动化信任度的指标
Hum Factors. 2016 May;58(3):509-19. doi: 10.1177/0018720815625744. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.理解高事故风险驾驶员在条件自动化驾驶期间的接管性能。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Aug;143:105543. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105543. Epub 2020 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
A big data approach to improving the vehicle emission inventory in China.大数据方法在中国改善车辆排放清单中的应用。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 3;11(1):2801. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16579-w.
2
I want to brake free: The effect of connected vehicle features on driver behaviour, usability and acceptance.我想要自由驰骋:车联网功能对驾驶员行为、可用性和接受度的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102932. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102932. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
3
The More You Know: Trust Dynamics and Calibration in Highly Automated Driving and the Effects of Take-Overs, System Malfunction, and System Transparency.
知之愈多:高度自动化驾驶中的信任动态和校准,以及接管、系统故障和系统透明度的影响。
Hum Factors. 2020 Aug;62(5):718-736. doi: 10.1177/0018720819853686. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
4
Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.对自动化的信任:整合关于影响信任因素的实证证据。
Hum Factors. 2015 May;57(3):407-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720814547570. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
5
Improving homogeneity by dynamic speed limit systems.通过动态限速系统提高均匀性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 May;42(3):944-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.05.002.
6
Cardiac autonomic control during simulated driving with a concurrent verbal working memory task.在伴有并发言语工作记忆任务的模拟驾驶过程中的心脏自主神经控制
Hum Factors. 2009 Jun;51(3):404-18. doi: 10.1177/0018720809337716.
7
Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance.自然状态下手机通话对驾驶性能的影响。
J Safety Res. 2004;35(4):453-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.06.003.
8
Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.对自动化的信任:设计适度的依赖。
Hum Factors. 2004 Spring;46(1):50-80. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.
9
Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems.人机系统中的信任、控制策略与功能分配
Ergonomics. 1992 Oct;35(10):1243-70. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967392.