• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标在预测与领导力相关的行为方面有多准确?

How good is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator for predicting leadership-related behaviors?

作者信息

Zárate-Torres Rodrigo, Correa Juan C

机构信息

Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración, Bogotá, Colombia.

Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 2;14:940961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.940961. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.940961
PMID:36936015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10017728/
Abstract

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a popular tool used by psychologists working as managers' coaches in organizational contexts. Despite its popularity, few studies provide empirical evidence on the role of the MBTI as a predictor of managers' leadership-related behaviors. This article is written based on research that answers the question of how good the MBTI is to prove leadership behavior. It does so by comparing goodness-of-fit indexes of two confirmatory factor analysis models and two structural models on the personality-leadership relationship, following standards of reproducible research principles. We sampled 529 participants who were graduate and undergraduate students enrolled in business administration programs from Colombian universities. Results show conclusive evidence of the psychometric measurement of both MBTI and leadership practices, even though the relationship between MBTI and the leadership practices inventory proved to be weak.

摘要

迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标(MBTI)是组织环境中担任经理教练的心理学家常用的工具。尽管它很受欢迎,但很少有研究提供实证证据证明MBTI在预测经理与领导相关行为方面的作用。本文基于一项研究撰写,该研究回答了MBTI在证明领导行为方面的有效性如何的问题。它通过按照可重复研究原则的标准,比较两个验证性因素分析模型以及两个人格-领导关系结构模型的拟合优度指标来做到这一点。我们对529名参与者进行了抽样,他们是哥伦比亚大学工商管理专业的研究生和本科生。结果显示了MBTI和领导实践的心理测量的确凿证据,尽管MBTI与领导实践量表之间的关系被证明很弱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/10017728/6effaa8f4718/fpsyg-14-940961-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/10017728/8fa6d1b8822e/fpsyg-14-940961-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/10017728/6effaa8f4718/fpsyg-14-940961-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/10017728/8fa6d1b8822e/fpsyg-14-940961-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f38a/10017728/6effaa8f4718/fpsyg-14-940961-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
How good is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator for predicting leadership-related behaviors?迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标在预测与领导力相关的行为方面有多准确?
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 2;14:940961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.940961. eCollection 2023.
2
Personality of Belgian physicians in a clinical leadership program.参加临床领导力项目的比利时医生的性格特点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3645-1.
3
Predicting judging-perceiving of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) in online social forum.在线社交论坛中迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标(MBTI)判断-感知维度的预测
PeerJ. 2021 Jun 23;9:e11382. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11382. eCollection 2021.
4
Bipolarity in Jungian type theory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.荣格类型理论与迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标中的两极对立。
J Pers Assess. 1993 Apr;60(2):290-301. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6002_7.
5
A comparative view of the Myers-Briggs type indicator.迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标的比较视角。
Fam Med. 1993 Mar;25(3):186-90.
6
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Personality Types of Female Intern Doctors and Their Specialty Preference.迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标人格类型与女性实习医生的专业偏好。
Mymensingh Med J. 2022 Jul;31(3):806-811.
7
The association between Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Psychiatry as the specialty choice.迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标与将精神病学作为专业选择之间的关联。
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Feb 6;7:48-51. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5698.e2cd.
8
Understanding and applying personality types in healthcare communication.理解和应用人格类型在医疗保健沟通中。
Nurs Stand. 2020 Jul 8;35(7):27-34. doi: 10.7748/ns.2020.e11490. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
9
Exploring the Relationship Between Imposter Phenomenon and Myers-Briggs Personality Types in Pharmacy Education.探索冒名顶替现象与药剂学教育中的迈尔斯-布里格斯人格类型之间的关系。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Jun;87(6):100076. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100076. Epub 2023 May 9.
10
Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality.从人格五因素模型的视角重新诠释迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标。
J Pers. 1989 Mar;57(1):17-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Social impact of happiness on transformational leadership in students from Colombian universities.幸福对哥伦比亚大学学生变革型领导力的社会影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1571572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1571572. eCollection 2025.
2
Association of work ability with job burnout and sleep quality among biosafety laboratory personnel in Xinjiang, China: a cross-sectional study.中国新疆生物安全实验室人员工作能力与职业倦怠及睡眠质量的关联:一项横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 20;12:1479257. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1479257. eCollection 2024.
3
The Myers-Briggs type indicator association with United States medical student performance, demographics, and career values.

本文引用的文献

1
An investigation of the role of leadership in consensus decision-making.领导力在共识决策中作用的调查。
J Theor Biol. 2022 Jun 21;543:111094. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111094. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
Predicting judging-perceiving of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) in online social forum.在线社交论坛中迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标(MBTI)判断-感知维度的预测
PeerJ. 2021 Jun 23;9:e11382. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11382. eCollection 2021.
3
Does Personality Matter? Perceptions and Experiences of Introverts and Extraverts as General Surgeons.
迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标与美国医学生表现、人口统计学和职业价值观的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):1293. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06297-y.
性格重要吗?内向型和外向型外科医生的看法和体验。
Teach Learn Med. 2022 Jun-Jul;34(3):255-265. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1922284. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014-2017).心理学领域透明度和可重复性相关研究实践的流行度评估(2014-2017)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;17(1):239-251. doi: 10.1177/1745691620979806. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Being Conscious of One's Own Heroism: An Empirical Approach to Analyzing the Leadership Potential of Future CEOs.意识到自身的英雄主义:一种分析未来首席执行官领导潜力的实证方法。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 17;9:2787. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02787. eCollection 2018.
6
The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables.带有稳健修正的 ML、DWLS 和 ULS 估计在有序变量结构方程模型中的表现。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Sep;21(3):369-87. doi: 10.1037/met0000093.
7
Myers-Briggs typology and Jungian individuation.迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类法与荣格的个性化理论
J Anal Psychol. 2016 Jun;61(3):289-308. doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.12233.
8
Knowing Your Preference: The Nexus of Personality and Leadership.了解你的偏好:个性与领导力的关系
Creat Nurs. 2015;21(3):172-8. doi: 10.1891/1078-4535.21.3.172.
9
Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis.人格与变革型和交易型领导:一项元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Oct;89(5):901-10. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.901.
10
Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: set like plaster or persistent change?成年早期和中期的人格发展:一成不变还是持续变化?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 May;84(5):1041-53. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1041.