Cole Elaine, Aylwin Chris, Christie Robert, Dillane Bebhinn, Farrah Helen, Hopkins Phillip, Ryan Chris, Woodgate Adam, Brohi Karim
Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Jun 16;3(2):e174. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000174. eCollection 2022 Jun.
The objective was to explore the characteristics and outcomes of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in older trauma patients.
Severely injured older people present an increasing challenge for trauma systems. Recovery for those who require critical care may be complicated by MODS. In older trauma patients, MODS may not be predictable based on chronological age alone and factors associated with its development and resolution are unclear.
Consecutive adult patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to 4 level 1 major trauma center critical care units were enrolled and reviewed daily until discharge or death. MODS was defined by a daily total sequential organ failure assessment score of >5.
One thousand three hundred sixteen patients were enrolled over 18 months and one-third (434) were aged ≥65 years. Incidence of MODS was high for both age groups (<65 years: 64%, ≥65 years: 70%). There were few differences in severity, patterns, and duration of MODS between cohorts, except for older traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients who experienced a prolonged course of MODS recovery (TBI: 9 days vs no TBI: 5 days, < 0.01). Frailty rather than chronological age had a strong association with MODS development (odds ratio [OR], 6.9; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 3.0-12.4; < 0.001) and MODS mortality (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.31-3.38; = 0.02). Critical care resource utilization was not increased in older patients, but MODS had a substantial impact on mortality (<65 years: 17%; ≥65 years: 28%). The majority of older patients who did not develop MODS survived and had favorable discharge outcomes (home discharge ≥65 years NoMODS: 50% vs MODS: 15%; < 0.01).
Frailty rather than chronological age appears to drive MODS development, recovery, and outcome in older cohorts. Early identification of frailty after trauma may help to predict MODS and plan care in older trauma.
目的是探讨老年创伤患者多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)的特征及转归。
严重受伤的老年人给创伤救治系统带来了日益严峻的挑战。对于那些需要重症监护的患者,MODS可能会使康复过程变得复杂。在老年创伤患者中,仅根据实际年龄可能无法预测MODS,且与其发生和缓解相关的因素尚不清楚。
纳入连续入住4家一级大型创伤中心重症监护病房的成年患者(年龄≥16岁),每日进行评估直至出院或死亡。MODS定义为每日序贯器官衰竭评估总分>5分。
18个月内共纳入1316例患者,其中三分之一(434例)年龄≥65岁。两个年龄组的MODS发生率均较高(<65岁组:64%;≥65岁组:70%)。除老年创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者MODS恢复过程较长外(TBI:9天 vs 非TBI:5天,P<0.01),两组在MODS的严重程度、模式和持续时间方面差异不大。虚弱而非实际年龄与MODS的发生(比值比[OR],6.9;95%置信区间[CI],3.0 - 12.4;P<0.001)和MODS死亡率(OR,2.1;95%CI,1.31 - 3.38;P = 0.02)密切相关。老年患者的重症监护资源利用率并未增加,但MODS对死亡率有重大影响(<65岁组:17%;≥65岁组:28%)。大多数未发生MODS的老年患者存活且出院情况良好(≥65岁未发生MODS组家庭出院率:50% vs MODS组:15%;P<0.01)。
在老年人群中,似乎是虚弱而非实际年龄驱动了MODS的发生、恢复及转归。创伤后早期识别虚弱可能有助于预测老年创伤患者的MODS并规划治疗方案。